IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8830-d1159702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision Support Software Application for the Design of Agrophotovoltaic Systems in Republic of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Youngjin Kim

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea)

  • Yeongjae On

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea)

  • Junyong So

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea)

  • Sumin Kim

    (Department of Environmental Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, College of Life Science & Biotechnology, Dankook University, Cheonan-si 31116, Republic of Korea)

  • Sojung Kim

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University-Seoul, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Agrophotovoltaic (APV) systems produce both solar energy and crops, so they are considered a sustainable alternative to traditional solar power plants, which can potentially destroy farmlands. However, it is challenging to diffuse APV systems because of their high installation and operating costs. Thus, to resolve the issue by maximizing the productivity and profits of an APV system, this study aims to propose a mobile-phone-based decision support system (DSS) for a supply chain network design for APV systems in South Korea using satellite imagery incorporating geographic information system (GIS) data. Particularly, polynomial regression models estimating annual corn ( Zea mays ) yields and the predicted generation of electricity were developed and integrated with the proposed DSS. Field experiment data provided by the APV system at Jeollanamdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services in South Korea were utilized. Two photovoltaic (PV) module types (mono-facial and bi-facial) and three different shading ratios for APV systems (21.3%, 25.6%, and 32.0%) were considered design factors for APV systems. An optimal network structure of 6 candidate APV systems and 15 agricultural markets was devised using the generalized reduced gradient (GRG) method. The profits of the six candidate APV systems are mainly affected by the transportation costs to the markets and the policy of the electricity selling prices. As a result, the proposed supply chain design framework successfully identifies an APV system network with maximum profits from crop production as well as electricity generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngjin Kim & Yeongjae On & Junyong So & Sumin Kim & Sojung Kim, 2023. "A Decision Support Software Application for the Design of Agrophotovoltaic Systems in Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8830-:d:1159702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. An, Kun & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2016. "Robust grain supply chain design considering post-harvest loss and harvest timing equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 110-128.
    2. Sojung Kim & Sumin Kim, 2021. "Performance Estimation Modeling via Machine Learning of an Agrophotovoltaic System in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Sojung Kim & Youngjin Kim & Youngjae On & Junyong So & Chang-Yong Yoon & Sumin Kim, 2022. "Hybrid Performance Modeling of an Agrophotovoltaic System in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Kwon, Tae-hyeong, 2020. "Policy mix of renewable portfolio standards, feed-in tariffs, and auctions in South Korea: Are three better than one?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Tae-Hwa Kim & Ki-Suk Chun & Seung-Ryong Yang, 2021. "Analyzing the Impact of Agrophotovoltaic Power Plants on the Amenity Value of Agricultural Landscape: The Case of the Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Huang, Endai & Zhang, Xiaolei & Rodriguez, Luis & Khanna, Madhu & de Jong, Sierk & Ting, K.C. & Ying, Yibin & Lin, Tao, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization for sustainable renewable jet fuel production: A case study of corn stover based supply chain system in Midwestern U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M. & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2019. "Modelling and analysis of intermodal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 281-297.
    2. Silvia Araújo dos Reis & José Eugenio Leal & Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé, 2023. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Tactical Planning in the Soybean Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Sojung Kim & Sumin Kim, 2023. "Economic Feasibility Comparison between Building-Integrated Photovoltaics and Green Systems in Northeast Texas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Tri-Dung Nguyen & Uday Venkatadri & Tri Nguyen-Quang & Claver Diallo & Duc-Huy Pham & Huu-Thanh Phan & Le-Khai Pham & Phu-Cuong Nguyen & Michelle Adams, 2024. "Stochastic Modelling Frameworks for Dragon Fruit Supply Chains in Vietnam under Uncertain Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Tuğçe Taşkıner & Bilge Bilgen, 2021. "Optimization Models for Harvest and Production Planning in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Na Luo & Tava Lennon Olsen & Yanping Liu, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework to Analyze Food Loss and Waste within Food Supply Chains: An Operations Management Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Ahumada, Omar & Rene Villalobos, J. & Nicholas Mason, A., 2012. "Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-26.
    8. Jena, Sanjay Dominik & Poggi, Marcus, 2013. "Harvest planning in the Brazilian sugar cane industry via mixed integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 374-384.
    9. Salehi-Amiri, Amirhossein & Zahedi, Ali & Akbapour, Navid & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa, 2021. "Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network for walnut industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Ba, Birome Holo & Prins, Christian & Prodhon, Caroline, 2016. "Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: An Operations Research perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 977-989.
    11. Lee, Jongkuk & Palekar, Udatta S. & Qualls, William, 2011. "Supply chain efficiency and security: Coordination for collaborative investment in technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 568-578, May.
    12. Stüve, David & van der Meer, Robert & Lütke Entrup, Matthias & Agha, Mouhamad Shaker Ali, 2020. "Supply chain planning in the food industry," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science and Innovation in Supply Chain Management: How Data Transforms the Value Chain. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Lo, volume 29, pages 317-353, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    13. Amorim, P. & Günther, H.-O. & Almada-Lobo, B., 2012. "Multi-objective integrated production and distribution planning of perishable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 89-101.
    14. Marcello Stanco & Concetta Nazzaro & Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2020. "Sustainable Collective Innovation in the Agri-Food Value Chain: The Case of the “Aureo” Wheat Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    16. Omar Ahumada & J. Villalobos, 2011. "A tactical model for planning the production and distribution of fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 339-358, October.
    17. Lejarza, Fernando & Pistikopoulos, Ioannis & Baldea, Michael, 2021. "A scalable real-time solution strategy for supply chain management of fresh produce: A Mexico-to-United States cross border study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    18. Clavijo-Buritica, Nicolás & Triana-Sanchez, Laura & Escobar, John Willmer, 2023. "A hybrid modeling approach for resilient agri-supply network design in emerging countries: Colombian coffee supply chain," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Luo, Na & Olsen, Tava & Liu, Yanping & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Reducing food loss and waste in supply chain operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    20. Riccardo Accorsi & Lorenzo Versari & Riccardo Manzini, 2015. "Glass vs. Plastic: Life Cycle Assessment of Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Bottles across Global Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8830-:d:1159702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.