IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p446-d1016724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual Reality Destination Experiences Model: A Moderating Variable between Wisesa Sustainable Tourism Behavior and Tourists’ Intention to Visit

Author

Listed:
  • Yohan Wismantoro

    (Graduate School of Management, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang 50131, Indonesia)

  • Vincent Didiek Wiet Aryanto

    (Graduate School of Management, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang 50131, Indonesia)

  • Imang Dapit Pamungkas

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang 50131, Indonesia)

  • Nanda Adhi Purusa

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang 50131, Indonesia)

  • Amron

    (Graduate School of Management, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang 50131, Indonesia)

  • Amalia Nur Chasanah

    (Department of Management, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang 50131, Indonesia)

  • Usman

    (Department of Management, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang 50131, Indonesia)

Abstract

Sustainable tourism in Indonesia is challenging because it must harmonize bringing in tourists and maintaining the sustainability of culture and nature. Environmental problems influence sustainability tourism in Indonesia. Aside from discussing the policy implementation, this research focuses on promoting the local wisdom of sustainable tourism coupled with a virtual reality application. This study is supported by various previous studies on sustainability coupled with digital technology. Placing tourism in the contexts of eco-tourism, ecosystem, and sustainability is based on belief in the existence of values, beliefs, and norms (VBN). This research aims at developing a virtual reality destination experience (VRDE) model as a moderating variable between sustainable tourist behavior (STB) and tourist visit intention (TVI). The portability variable strengthens VRDE, and the content quality variable supports VRDE. The research method used was purposive convenience sampling covering 204 respondents who visited the vicinity of Kebon Indah batik village in Klaten, Central Java, Indonesia. The research findings were H1—STB has a significant effect on VRDE (0.00 < 0.05), H2—VDRE has a significant impact on TVI (0.00 < 0.005), H3—portability has a significant effect on VRDE (0.039 < 0.05), and H4—content quality does not have an impact on VRDE (0.401 > 0.05). The novelty of this research is the VRDE application applied to community sustainable tourist behavior in developing countries. However, the content quality of VR has yet to meet respondents’ expectation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yohan Wismantoro & Vincent Didiek Wiet Aryanto & Imang Dapit Pamungkas & Nanda Adhi Purusa & Amron & Amalia Nur Chasanah & Usman, 2022. "Virtual Reality Destination Experiences Model: A Moderating Variable between Wisesa Sustainable Tourism Behavior and Tourists’ Intention to Visit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:446-:d:1016724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/446/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/446/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pleyers, Gordy & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Non-immersive virtual reality technologies in real estate: How customer experience drives attitudes toward properties and the service provider," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Francesco Schiavone & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora & Marcello Risitano, 2020. "The strategic, organizational, and entrepreneurial evolution of smart cities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1155-1165, December.
    3. Manis, Kerry T. & Choi, Danny, 2019. "The virtual reality hardware acceptance model (VR-HAM): Extending and individuating the technology acceptance model (TAM) for virtual reality hardware," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 503-513.
    4. Meißner, Martin & Pfeiffer, Jella & Pfeiffer, Thies & Oppewal, Harmen, 2019. "Combining virtual reality and mobile eye tracking to provide a naturalistic experimental environment for shopper research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 445-458.
    5. Lim, Joon Soo & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Boyd, D. Eric & Koles, Bernadett, 2019. "Virtual reality and its impact on B2B marketing: A value-in-use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 590-598.
    7. Yuen, Kum Fai & Chua, Jessana & Li, Kevin X. & Wang, Xueqin, 2022. "Consumer's adoption of virtual reality technologies for marine conservation: Motivational and technology acceptance perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Dhruv Grewal & John Hulland & Praveen K. Kopalle & Elena Karahanna, 2020. "The future of technology and marketing: a multidisciplinary perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 1-8, January.
    9. Beuckels, Emma & Hudders, Liselot, 2016. "An experimental study to investigate the impact of image interactivity on the perception of luxury in an online shopping context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 135-142.
    10. Huanchen Tang & Ruiqi Wang & Xiaowen Jin & Zhengzheng Zhang, 2022. "The Effects of Motivation, Destination Image and Satisfaction on Rural Tourism Tourists’ Willingness to Revisit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Heetae Yang & Hwansoo Lee, 2019. "Understanding user behavior of virtual personal assistant devices," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 65-87, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, Kelley Cours & Laverie, Debra A., 2022. "In the consumers’ eye: A mixed-method approach to understanding how VR-Content influences unbranded product quality perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Wedel, Michel & Bigné, Enrique & Zhang, Jie, 2020. "Virtual and augmented reality: Advancing research in consumer marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 443-465.
    3. Kostyk, Alena & Sheng, Jie, 2023. "VR in customer-centered marketing: Purpose-driven design," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 225-236.
    4. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia & Guerreiro, João & Japutra, Arnold, 2021. "How escapism leads to behavioral intention in a virtual reality store with background music?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 288-300.
    5. Nannan Xi & Juan Chen & Filipe Gama & Marc Riar & Juho Hamari, 2023. "The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 659-680, April.
    6. Vlačić, Božidar & Corbo, Leonardo & Costa e Silva, Susana & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "The evolving role of artificial intelligence in marketing: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 187-203.
    7. van Berlo, Zeph M.C. & van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & Smit, Edith G. & van der Laan, L. Nynke, 2021. "Brands in virtual reality games: Affective processes within computer-mediated consumer experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 458-465.
    8. Beeler, Lisa & Zablah, Alex R. & Rapp, Adam, 2022. "Ability is in the eye of the beholder: How context and individual factors shape consumer perceptions of digital assistant ability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 33-46.
    9. de Regt, Anouk & Plangger, Kirk & Barnes, Stuart J., 2021. "Virtual reality marketing and customer advocacy: Transforming experiences from story-telling to story-doing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 513-522.
    10. Pyper, Keith & Marie Doherty, Anne & Gounaris, Spiros & Wilson, Alan, 2022. "A contingency-based approach to the nexus between international strategic brand management and export performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 472-488.
    11. Milica Mormann & Tom Griffiths & Chris Janiszewski & J. Edward Russo & Anocha Aribarg & Nathaniel J. S. Ashby & Rajesh Bagchi & Sudeep Bhatia & Aleksandra Kovacheva & Martin Meissner & Kellen J. Mrkva, 2020. "Time to pay attention to attention: using attention-based process traces to better understand consumer decision-making," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 381-392, December.
    12. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Holopainen, Jani & Mattila, Osmo & Pöyry, Essi & Parvinen, Petri, 2020. "Applying design science research methodology in the development of virtual reality forest management services," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Lim, Joon Soo & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Bag, Sujoy & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar & Chan, Felix T.S., 2019. "Predicting the consumer's purchase intention of durable goods: An attribute-level analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 408-419.
    16. Irina Maiorescu & Mihaela Bucur & Bogdan Georgescu & Daniel Moise & Vasile Alecsandru Strat & Ion Daniel Zgură, 2020. "Social Media and IOT Wearables in Developing Marketing Strategies. Do SMEs Differ From Large Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    18. Ganesh Dash & Chetan Sharma & Shamneesh Sharma, 2023. "Sustainable Marketing and the Role of Social Media: An Experimental Study Using Natural Language Processing (NLP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Karina RADCHENKO, 2024. "Factors influencing the content of Smart City initiatives(particularly based on institutional theories of organization)," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 8(3), pages 55-64, April.
    20. Qiulai Su & Fei Zhou & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2020. "Using Virtual Gifts on Live Streaming Platforms as a Sustainable Strategy to Stimulate Consumers’ Green Purchase Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:446-:d:1016724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.