IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2274-d751478.html

Fostering Responsible Innovation through Stakeholder Engagement: Case Study of North Carolina Sweetpotato Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Khara Grieger

    (Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA
    Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7565, USA)

  • Sebastian Zarate

    (Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7565, USA
    Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8008, USA)

  • Sarah Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling

    (Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7565, USA)

  • Shelly Hunt

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7625, USA)

  • Daniela Jones

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7625, USA)

  • Jennifer Kuzma

    (Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7565, USA
    School of Public and International Affairs, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8102, USA)

Abstract

Stakeholder and community engagement are critical for the successful development of new technologies that aim to be integrated into sustainable agriculture systems. This study reports on an approach used to engage stakeholders within the sweetpotato community in North Carolina to understand their preferences, needs, and concerns as they relate to a new sensing and diagnostic platform. This work also demonstrates an example of real-time technology assessment that also fosters responsible innovation through inclusivity and responsiveness. Through the conduction of 29 interviews with sweetpotato stakeholders in North Carolina, we found that participants found the most value in detecting external sweetpotato characteristics, as well as the ability to use or connect to a smartphone that can be used in field. They also found value in including environmental parameters and having a Spanish language module. Most participants indicated that they were comfortable with sharing data as long as it benefited the greater North Carolina sweetpotato industry, and were concerned with sharing these data with “outside” competitors. We also observed differences and variations between stakeholder groups. Overall, this work demonstrates a relatively simple, low-cost approach to eliciting stakeholder needs within a local agricultural context to improve sustainability, an approach that could be leveraged and transferred to other local agrifood systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Khara Grieger & Sebastian Zarate & Sarah Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling & Shelly Hunt & Daniela Jones & Jennifer Kuzma, 2022. "Fostering Responsible Innovation through Stakeholder Engagement: Case Study of North Carolina Sweetpotato Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2274-:d:751478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Kliskey & Paula Williams & David L. Griffith & Virginia H. Dale & Chelsea Schelly & Anna-Maria Marshall & Valoree S. Gagnon & Weston M. Eaton & Kristin Floress, 2021. "Thinking Big and Thinking Small: A Conceptual Framework for Best Practices in Community and Stakeholder Engagement in Food, Energy, and Water Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Chambers, Robert, 1994. "Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(9), pages 1253-1268, September.
    3. Ely, Adrian & Van Zwanenberg, Patrick & Stirling, Andrew, 2014. "Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: Approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 505-518.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Molist , Adrià Menéndez i & Kallas, Zein & Fuentes , Omar Vicente Guadarrama, 2024. "Assessing Downstream and Upstream Stakeholders’ Preferences for Sustainability Attributes in the Tomato Value Chain," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344299, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    2. Shibu Das & Kaushal Kumar Sharma & Suranjan Majumder & Indrajit Roy Chowdhury, 2025. "Evaluating sustainable agricultural livelihood security in West Bengal, India: a principal component analysis approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4769-4816, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shibu Das & Kaushal Kumar Sharma & Suranjan Majumder & Indrajit Roy Chowdhury, 2025. "Evaluating sustainable agricultural livelihood security in West Bengal, India: a principal component analysis approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4769-4816, February.
    2. Jacob L. Jones & David M. Berube & Maude Cuchiara & Khara Grieger & Elaine A. Cohen Hubal & Sarah J. Karikó & Phillip Strader & Yves Theriault, 2024. "Positioning nanotechnology to address climate change," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1039-1053, December.
    3. Ruiten, Kyra & Pesch, Udo & Rodhouse, Toyah & Correljé, Aad & Spruit, Shannon & Tenhaaf, Antje & Dijkshoorn, Jochem & van den Berg, Susan, 2023. "Drawing the line: Opening up and closing down the siting of a high voltage transmission route in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Chris Tennant & Susan Howard & Sally Stares, 2021. "Building the UK vision of a driverless future: A Parliamentary Inquiry case study," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Chatterjee, Ira & Cornelissen, Joep & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "Social entrepreneurship and values work: The role of practices in shaping values and negotiating change," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    6. Chilombo, Andrew & Van Der Horst, Dan, 2021. "Livelihoods and coping strategies of local communities on previous customary land in limbo of commercial agricultural development: Lessons from the farm block program in Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Moriarty, P & Lovell, C, 1998. "Groundwater Resource Development In The Context Of Farming Systems Intensification And Changing Rainfall Regimes: A Case Study From South East Zimbabwe," Overseas Development Institute Archive 295999, Overseas Development Institute.
    8. Gerard Olivar-Tost & Johnny Valencia-Calvo & Julián Andrés Castrillón-Gómez, 2020. "Towards Decision-Making for the Assessment and Prioritization of Green Projects: An Integration between System Dynamics and Participatory Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Dean Karlan & Bram Thuysbaert, 2019. "Targeting Ultra-Poor Households in Honduras and Peru," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 63-94.
    10. Glyn Williams & Manoj Srivastava & Stuart Corbridge & René Véron, 2003. "Enhancing pro-poor governance in Eastern India: participation, politics and action research," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 3(2), pages 159-178, April.
    11. Schleicher, Michael & Souares, Aurélia & Pacere, Athanase Narangoro & Sauerborn, Rainer & Klonner, Stefan, 2016. "Decentralized versus Statistical Targeting of Anti-Poverty Programs: Evidence from Burkina Faso," Working Papers 0623, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    12. Astleithner, Franz & Binder, David & Bingemer, Josefine & Bojanovsky, Isabel & Czingon, Claudia & Enz, Iris & Feiner, Georg & Gneist, Cornelius & Haindorfer, Raimund & Kogler, Raphaela & Kroneder, And, 2009. "Indikatoren zur sozialen Nachhaltigkeit im Tourismus: Explorative Erkundungen in zwei Regionen in Peru," ÖFSE-Forum, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), volume 42, number 42.
    13. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2020. "Exploring the Nexus Between Participation and Empowerment," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 32-53, January.
    14. Jayasinghe, Kelum & Wickramasinghe, Danture, 2011. "Power over empowerment: Encountering development accounting in a Sri Lankan fishing village," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 396-414.
    15. Yang Yu & Desmond Appiah & Bernard Zulu & Kofi Asamoah Adu-Poku, 2024. "Integrating Rural Development, Education, and Management: Challenges and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Jinnat Ara & Dipanwita Sarkar & Jayanta Sarkar, 2021. "Like mother like daughter? Occupational mobility among children under asset transfer program in Bangladesh," QuBE Working Papers 061, QUT Business School.
    17. Das, Narayan C & Raza, Wameq A, 2010. "Does a Grant-based Approach Work for Addressing Extreme Poverty? A RCT Approach," MPRA Paper 51005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Pemsl, Diemuth E. & Staver, Charles & Hareau, Guy & Alene, Arega D. & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Kleinwechter, Ulrich & Labarta, Ricardo & Thiele, Graham, 2022. "Prioritizing international agricultural research investments: lessons from a global multi-crop assessment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    19. Popular Gentle & Rik Thwaites & Digby Race & Kim Alexander, 2014. "Differential impacts of climate change on communities in the middle hills region of Nepal," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 815-836, November.
    20. Raza, Wameq A. & Van de Poel, Ellen & Van Ourti, Tom, 2018. "Impact and spill-over effects of an asset transfer program on child undernutrition: Evidence from a randomized control trial in Bangladesh," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 105-120.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2274-:d:751478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.