IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15863-d987240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Common Prosperity Level and Regional Difference Based on the Background of Green Development

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang-Fei Ma

    (School of Marxism, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Ru Zhang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yi-Fan Ruan

    (School of Marxism, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Green development and common prosperity are two major development goals put forward by the Chinese government. Based on the background of green development, the index system of common prosperity is designed in this paper, and the entropy method and coefficient of variation method are used to calculate the level of common prosperity in China from 2010 to 2020. The research findings are as follows: Firstly, the level of common prosperity based on the background of China’s green development has been raised from 2010 to 2020. The level of common prosperity based on the background of China’s green development has increased from 0.301 in 2010 to 0.513 in 2020. Secondly, based on the background of China’s green development, the level of common prosperity in the eastern region is higher than that in the northeast region, the northeast region is higher than that in the central region, and the central region is higher than that in the western region. Thirdly, the regional difference in common prosperity level based on the background of green development shows a trend of narrowing, with the coefficient of variation decreasing from 0.25 in 2010 to 0.13 in 2020. Finally, based on the research findings, corresponding suggestions are put forward to promote common prosperity.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang-Fei Ma & Ru Zhang & Yi-Fan Ruan, 2022. "Evaluation of Common Prosperity Level and Regional Difference Based on the Background of Green Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15863-:d:987240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Dongyang & Mohsin, Muhammad & Rasheed, Abdul Khaliq & Chang, Youngho & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: Mediating role of green finance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Graciela Chichilnisky, 1997. "What Is Sustainable Development?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 73(4), pages 467-491.
    3. Nanak Kakwani & Xiaobing Wang & Ning Xue & Peng Zhan, 2022. "Growth and Common Prosperity in China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(1), pages 28-57, January.
    4. Alvaredo, Facundo, 2011. "A note on the relationship between top income shares and the Gini coefficient," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 274-277, March.
    5. Xin Duan & Shengli Dai & Rui Yang & Ziwei Duan & Yanhong Tang, 2020. "Environmental Collaborative Governance Degree of Government, Corporation, and Public," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Zhang, Xiaohong & Wu, Liqian & Zhang, Rong & Deng, Shihuai & Zhang, Yanzong & Wu, Jun & Li, Yuanwei & Lin, Lili & Li, Li & Wang, Yinjun & Wang, Lilin, 2013. "Evaluating the relationships among economic growth, energy consumption, air emissions and air environmental protection investment in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 259-270.
    7. Alexey Bilgaev & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva & Taisiya Bardakhanova & Svetlana Ayusheeva & Fujia Li & Suocheng Dong, 2022. "Green Economy Development Progress in the Republic of Buryatia (Russia)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    8. José M. Pastor & Carlos Peraita & Lorenzo Serrano & Ángel Soler, 2018. "Higher education institutions, economic growth and GDP per capita in European Union countries," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 1616-1637, August.
    9. Duan Xin & Zhang Zhi Sheng & Sun Jiahui & Wei Zhang, 2022. "How Technological Innovation Influences Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-9, March.
    10. Molero-Simarro, Ricardo, 2017. "Inequality in China revisited. The effect of functional distribution of income on urban top incomes, the urban-rural gap and the Gini index, 1978–2015," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 101-117.
    11. Kai-Cheng Liao & Ming-Yue Yue & Si-Wei Sun & Hong-Bo Xue & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Jiang-Tao Wang, 2018. "An Evaluation of Coupling Coordination between Tourism and Finance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Yuhan Wang & Zenghui Huo & Dongpo Li & Mei Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation of Common Prosperity Level and Regional Difference Analysis along the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Yanli Wang & Na Zhao & Xiaodong Lei & Ruyin Long, 2021. "Green Finance Innovation and Regional Green Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Chen & Yuanbo Zhang, 2023. "Does the Development of the Digital Economy Promote Common Prosperity?—Analysis Based on 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Rui Yang & Yingwen Chen & Yiqun Liu & Yuchen Feng & Jianwan Ji & Christina W. Y. Wong & Xin Miao & Yanhong Tang, 2023. "Government–business relations, environmental information transparency, and Hu-line-related factors in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7215-7238, July.
    3. Fields, Gary S. & Meng, Xin & Song, Yang, 2022. "Earnings mobility during labor market reforms in urban China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2023. "Revisiting income inequality among households: New evidence from the Chinese Household Income Project," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Foellmi, Reto & Martínez, Isabel Z., 2014. "Volatile Top Income Shares in Switzerland? Reassessing the Evolution Between 1981 and 2009," CEPR Discussion Papers 10006, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Zhang, XiaoHong & Cao, Jun & Li, JinRong & Deng, ShiHuai & Zhang, YanZong & Wu, Jun, 2015. "Influence of sewage treatment on China׳s energy consumption and economy and its performances," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1009-1018.
    7. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Robert Matusiak & Marta Paduszyńska & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Green Jobs in the EU Renewable Energy Sector: Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Frédéric Gannon & Florence Legros & Vincent Touzé, 2020. "Sustainability of pension schemes. Building a smooth automatic balance mechanism with an application to the us social security," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(6), pages 377-401.
    9. Paul Makdissi & Myra Yazbeck, 2012. "On the Measurement of Indignation," Working Papers 1213E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    10. Tuo Shi & Yuanman Hu & Miao Liu & Chunlin Li & Chuyi Zhang & Chong Liu, 2020. "How Do Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Industrialization Affect Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations? An Assessment in Liaoning Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Pablo García S. & Camilo Pérez N., 2017. "Desigualdad, inflación, ciclos y crisis en Chile," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 44(2 Year 20), pages 185-221, December.
    12. Onrubia Fernández, Jorge & Picos, Fidel & Rodado, María del Carmen, 2019. "Shifting tax burden to top income earners: What is the best way to reduce inequality?," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 13, pages 1-31.
    13. Defrancesco, Edi & Gatto, Paola & Rosato, Paolo, 2014. "A ‘component-based’ approach to discounting for natural resource damage assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-9.
    14. Omar Shafqat & Elena Malakhtka & Nina Chrobot & Per Lundqvist, 2021. "End Use Energy Services Framework Co-Creation with Multiple Stakeholders—A Living Lab-Based Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    15. Mei Zhang & Xinliang Wang, 2023. "Measurement of Common Prosperity of Chinese Rural Households Using Graded Response Models: Evidence from Zhejiang Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Charles Figuières & Mabel Tidball, 2016. "Sustainable Exploitation of a Natural Resource: A Satisfying Use of Chichilnisky’s Criterion," Studies in Economic Theory, in: Graciela Chichilnisky & Armon Rezai (ed.), The Economics of the Global Environment, pages 207-229, Springer.
    17. Hansen, Anders Chr., 2006. "Do declining discount rates lead to time inconsistent economic advice?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 138-144, November.
    18. W. J. Wouter Botzen & Jeroen C. J. M. Van Den Bergh & Graciela Chichilnisky, 2018. "Climate Policy Without Intertemporal Dictatorship: Chichilnisky Criterion Versus Classical Utilitarianism In Dice," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Yong Liu & Cuihong Long, 2021. "Urban and Rural Income Gap: Does Urban Spatial Form Matter in China?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    20. Ma, Cong & Cheok, Mui Yee & Chok, Nyen Vui, 2023. "Economic recovery through multisector management resources in small and medium businesses in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15863-:d:987240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.