IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14991-d971267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace Favoritism and Workforce Sustainability: An Analysis of Employees’ Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Taiwo Temitope Lasisi

    (Department of Recreology and Tourism, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, 50003 Králové, Czech Republic)

  • Enea Constanţa

    (Faculty of Economics Sciences, Constantin Brancuşi University of Târgu Jiu, Gorj County, 210135 Târgu Jiu, Romania)

  • Kayode Kolawole Eluwole

    (Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, Faculty of Fine Arts, Istanbul Gelisim University, 34310 Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

The goal of sustainability in business is the maximization of resources for long-term productivity at a minimized negative impact for all key stakeholders. Several functions of human resources management are designed to achieve this goal. However, HRM practices can sometimes spiral down and result in the perception of favoritism–a practice that recruits or rewards relationship over merit. Hence, this project was designed to measure the impact of favoritism on the development of a sustainable hospitality workforce through the measures of subjective well-being, psychological capital, and knowledge hiding behavior. With the aid of randomly selected employees and estimation of structural models, the study validates the deleterious impact of favoritism and organizational politics on employee outcomes and by extension the sustainability of the workforce. Practical and theoretical recommendations are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Taiwo Temitope Lasisi & Enea Constanţa & Kayode Kolawole Eluwole, 2022. "Workplace Favoritism and Workforce Sustainability: An Analysis of Employees’ Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14991-:d:971267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14991/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14991/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deepa Sethi & Manisha Seth, 2016. "Can Organizational Grapevine be Beneficial? An Exploratory Study in Indian Context," Working papers 194, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    2. Christopher C. Rosen & D. Lance Ferris & Douglas J. Brown & Yuanyi Chen & Ming Yan, 2014. "Perceptions of Organizational Politics: A Need Satisfaction Paradigm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1026-1055, August.
    3. Matthew Valle & K. Michele Kacmar & Suzanne Zivnuska, 2019. "Understanding the Effects of Political Environments on Unethical Behavior in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 173-188, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viljaras Reigas & Ligita Šimanskienė, 2023. "Accreditation Process and Employee Well-Being in Healthcare Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Ioana Gutu & Camelia Nicoleta Medeleanu, 2023. "Assessing Teleworkforce and Electronic Leadership Favorable for an Online Workforce Sustainability Framework by Using PLS SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.
    2. Wenceslao Unanue & Eduardo Barros & Marcos Gómez, 2021. "The Longitudinal Link between Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Three Different Models of Happiness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Long W. Lam & Aichia Chuang & Chi-Sum Wong & Julie N. Y. Zhu, 2019. "A typology of three-way interaction models: Applications and suggestions for Asian management research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Sheikh Raheel Manzoor & Atif Ullah & Rezwan Ullah & Afraseyab Khattak & Heesup Han & Sunghoon Yoo, 2023. "Micro CSR intervention towards employee behavioral and attitudinal outcomes: a parallel mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Walumbwa, Fred O. & Hartnell, Chad A. & Misati, Everlyne, 2017. "Does ethical leadership enhance group learning behavior? Examining the mediating influence of group ethical conduct, justice climate, and peer justice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 14-23.
    6. Liu, Yongmei & Liu, Xiao-Yu, 2018. "Politics under abusive supervision: The role of Machiavellianism and guanxi," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 649-659.
    7. Ken Cheng & Qianlin Zhu & Yinghui Lin, 2022. "Family-Supportive Supervisor Behavior, Felt Obligation, and Unethical Pro-family Behavior: The Moderating Role of Positive Reciprocity Beliefs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 261-273, May.
    8. Salah Gad & Walaa Elsayed, 2023. "Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Politics and Job Satisfaction Among NGO Social Workers," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 793-804, June.
    9. Soojin Lee & Jinhee Kim & Gukdo Byun, 2021. "Are Leaders’ Perceptions of Organizational Politics Worsening Favorable Employee Outcomes? The Role of Ethical Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-10, September.
    10. Hongyu Zhang & Xin Lucy Liu & Yahua Cai & Xiuli Sun, 2023. "Paved with Good Intentions: Self-regulation Breakdown After Altruistic Ethical Transgression," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(2), pages 385-405, August.
    11. Ulf Schaefer & Onno Bouwmeester, 2021. "Reconceptualizing Moral Disengagement as a Process: Transcending Overly Liberal and Overly Conservative Practice in the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 525-543, September.
    12. Jing Zhang & Lynda J. Song & Yue Wang & Guangjian Liu, 2018. "How authentic leadership influences employee proactivity: the sequential mediating effects of psychological empowerment and core self-evaluations and the moderating role of employee political skill," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Chen, Liangyong & Liu, Yu & Hu, Sanman & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior in the workplace: The roles of knowledge-sharing hostility and mindfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 268-276.
    14. Madhurima Mishra & Koustab Ghosh & Dheeraj Sharma, 2022. "Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 63-87, August.
    15. Rezwan Ullah & Muhammad Zada & Imran Saeed & Jawad Khan & Muhammad Shahbaz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, 2021. "Have You Heard That—“GOSSIP”? Gossip Spreads Rapidly and Influences Broadly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Qi Yang & Yuejuan Hou & Haoran Wei & Tingqiang Chen & Jining Wang, 2022. "Nonlinear Diffusion Evolution Model of Unethical Behavior among Green Food Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Ho, Violet T. & Kong, Dejun Tony, 2015. "Exploring the signaling function of idiosyncratic deals and their interaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-161.
    18. Yuntao Bai & Guohong Helen Han & P. D. Harms, 2016. "Team Conflict Mediates the Effects of Organizational Politics on Employee Performance: A Cross-Level Analysis in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 95-109, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14991-:d:971267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.