IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9204-d872983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Evaluation of a Prototype Self-Propelled Crop Sprayer for Agricultural Sustainability in Small Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Ghafoor

    (Department of Farm Machinery and Power, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Fraz Ahmad Khan

    (Department of Farm Machinery and Power, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Farzaneh Khorsandi

    (Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Muhammad Azam Khan

    (Department of Farm Machinery and Power, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Hafiz Muhammad Nauman

    (Department of Farm Machinery and Power, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Usman Farid

    (Department of Structures & Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

Abstract

In most Asian countries, farmers have smallholdings ranging from one to two hectares. The tractor-mounted boom sprayers cannot practically be used in small size farms with divided plots and complex terrain. To cope with these issues, a prototype self-propelled crop sprayer was developed, including a 20-hp engine, 300 L liquid tank, and hydraulically-controlled spray boom with eight hollow cone nozzles. The spray symmetry of the hollow cone nozzle was evaluated under four pressures (2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 bar) in the laboratory. The operating parameters of the sprayer, such as forward speed (4, 6, and 8 km h −1 ), spray height (40, 55, and 70 cm), and pressure (3, 5, and 7 bar) were optimized by measuring three spray characteristics including droplet density, coverage percentage, and Volume Median Diameter (VMD) in the cotton field. The results revealed that the nozzle spray was symmetrical at 2.5 and 3 bar pressure as the R 2 value was higher than 0.96. The field test result showed that in all treatments, treatments T14 (6 km h −1 , 55 cm, 5 bar) and T22 (8 km h −1 , 55 cm, 3 bar) were suitable for spraying medium-to-low concentration solution (post-emergence herbicides and fungicides) and high concentration solution (insecticides and pre-emergence herbicides), respectively. The spray characteristics at treatments T14 and T22 were 64.7 droplets cm −2 , 26.7%, 230 µm, and 39 droplets cm −2 , 14.9%, and 219.8 µm respectively. The field efficiency of the sprayer was 61%. The spraying cost per unit area was 55–64% less compared to manual labor cost. In conclusion, a prototype self-propelled crop sprayer is an efficient and environment-friendly technology for small farms. Operating the sprayer at the optimal parameters also saves operational costs and time.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Ghafoor & Fraz Ahmad Khan & Farzaneh Khorsandi & Muhammad Azam Khan & Hafiz Muhammad Nauman & Muhammad Usman Farid, 2022. "Development and Evaluation of a Prototype Self-Propelled Crop Sprayer for Agricultural Sustainability in Small Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9204-:d:872983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akbar Zaidi, S., 2015. "Issues in Pakistan's Economy: A Political Economy Perspective," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199401833.
    2. Shenggen Fan & Connie Chan‐Kang, 2005. "Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 135-146, January.
    3. Ovidiu Ranta & Ovidiu Marian & Mircea Valentin Muntean & Adrian Molnar & Alexandru Bogdan Ghețe & Valentin Crișan & Sorin Stănilă & Tibor Rittner, 2021. "Quality Analysis of Some Spray Parameters When Performing Treatments in Vineyards in Order to Reduce Environment Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Longfei Li & Xin He & Yumeng Xiao & Taowei Jiao & Wei Li, 2023. "Design and Experimental Verification of Targeted and Variable Sprayer for the Potato," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hurley, Mason, 2016. "Re-examining Changes in Farm Size Distributions Worldwide Using a Modified Generalized Method of Moments Approach," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 249287, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Mandal, Subham & Acharya, Sankar Kumar & Biswas, Amitava & Chatterjee, Riti, 2020. "Yield from Pulse Cultivation in Purulia, West Bengal: The Socio-Ecological and Techno-Managerial Interpretation," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 38(9).
    3. Cao, Yueming & Bai, Yunli & Zhang, Linxiu, 2021. "Plot Size, Adjacency, and Farmland Rental Contract Choice," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Kinza Zafar Sheikh & Muhammad Waqas & Muhammad Shahid Khan, 2018. "Challenges Of The Education System Of Pakistan: Especially Featuring Adult Literacy And Enrolment Rate Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(2), pages 187-197.
    5. Thapa, Sridhar, 2007. "The relationship between farm size and productivity: empirical evidence from the Nepalese mid-hills," 106th Seminar, October 25-27, 2007, Montpellier, France 7940, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Ashok K. Mishra & Anjani Kumar & Pramod K. Joshi & Alwin D'Souza, 2018. "Cooperatives, contract farming, and farm size: The case of tomato producers in Nepal," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 865-886, October.
    7. Singh, R.K.P. & Kumar, Abhay & Singh, K.M. & Kumar, Anjani, 2014. "Agricultural Production performance on Small farm holdings: Some Empirical Evidences from Bihar, India," MPRA Paper 59680, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Oct 2014.
    8. Kabibu Henry Muayila & Alain Kapemba Mujinga, 2018. "Technical Efficiency of Cassava's Producers in the Hinterland of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo," Post-Print hal-01831859, HAL.
    9. Nusrat Abedin Jimi & Plamen V. Nikolov & Mohammad Abdul Malek & Subal Kumbhakar, 2019. "The effects of access to credit on productivity: separating technological changes from changes in technical efficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 37-55, December.
    10. Larson,Donald F. & Muraoka,Rie & Otsuka,Keijiro, 2016. "On the central role of small farms in African rural development strategies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7710, The World Bank.
    11. Hohfeld, Lena & Waibel, Hermann, 2013. "Investments of Rural Households in Northeast Thailand and the Future of Small Scale Farming," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 52(3), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Wencheng Li & Lei Wang & Qi Wan & Weijia You & Shaowen Zhang, 2022. "A Configurational Analysis of Family Farm Management Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Baoling Zou & Zanjie Ren & Ashok K. Mishra & Stefan Hirsch, 2022. "The role of agricultural insurance in boosting agricultural output: An aggregate analysis from Chinese provinces," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 923-945, October.
    14. von Braun, Joachim & Mirzabaev, Alisher, 2015. "Small Farms: Changing Structures and Roles in Economic Development," Discussion Papers 210464, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    15. Grace Kite & Matthew McCartney, 2017. "Pro-business and pro-market reforms in Pakistan: economic growth and stagnation 1950–51 to 2011–12," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 454-476, July.
    16. Bhatt, Mohammad Sultan & Bhat, Showkat Ahmad, 2014. "Technical Efficiency and Farm Size Productivity ― Micro Level Evidence from Jammu & Kashmir," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 2(4), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Govinda P. Sharma & Ram Pandit & Ben White & Maksym Polyakov, 2020. "The income diversification strategies of smallholders in the hills of Nepal," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(6), pages 804-825, November.
    18. Wasim, Summerina & Munir, Kashif, 2017. "Regional Disparity and Decentralization in Pakistan: A Decomposition Analysis," MPRA Paper 83444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Dadan Wardhana & Rico Ihle & Wim Heijman, 2020. "Farmer cooperation in agro‐clusters: Evidence from Indonesia," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 725-750, October.
    20. Rao, Xudong, 2014. "Land Fragmentation with Double Bonuses -- The Case of Tanzanian Agriculture," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169436, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9204-:d:872983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.