IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7525-d843642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Innovation Capabilities and Sustainable Business Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Nur Atikah Zulkiffli

    (Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Malaysia)

  • Nur Farah Zafira Zaidi

    (Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Malaysia)

  • Siti Falindah Padlee

    (Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Malaysia)

  • Najahul Kamilah Aminy Sukri

    (Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Malaysia)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a direct impact on the manufacturing industry in Malaysia because all economic activities had to be suspended for some time. This study explores the role that eco-innovation capabilities might play in improving sustainable business performance during the ongoing pandemic. This study employs a quantitative method by distributing online questionnaires to 80 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Klang Valley, Malaysia. In the study, the relationship between sustainable business performance and the three variables of eco-innovation capabilities, i.e., eco-product innovation, eco-management innovation and eco-logistic innovation, were determined using multiple regression analysis. The results indicate that two hypotheses are accepted and the other one is rejected. The findings indicate that most manufacturing SMEs in Klang Valley have adopted eco-management innovation and eco-logistic innovation as crucial capabilities for their businesses during the pandemic. However, due to the challenges faced by these SMEs during the pandemic, eco-product innovation was found to have an insignificant relationship with sustainable business performance. It is insignificant because of the low productivity rate observed during the pandemic. Hence, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused manufacturing SMEs in the Klang Valley to not be able to maintain their operations and stay on track. Therefore, this research may contribute to the efforts of policymakers, government agencies and managers of manufacturing SMEs in developing a strong innovation platform on which manufacturing SMEs may rely for support in enhancing their business capacity and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Nur Atikah Zulkiffli & Nur Farah Zafira Zaidi & Siti Falindah Padlee & Najahul Kamilah Aminy Sukri, 2022. "Eco-Innovation Capabilities and Sustainable Business Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7525-:d:843642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7525/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7525/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pava, Moses L., 2007. "A Response to “Getting to the Bottom of ‘Triple Bottom Line’â€," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 105-110, January.
    2. Nor Hasliza Md Saad & Zulnaidi Yaacob, 2021. "Building a Personal Brand as a CEO: A Case Study of Vivy Yusof, the Cofounder of FashionValet and the dUCk Group," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    3. Yuan Lu & Lianxi Zhou & Garry Bruton & Weiwen Li, 2010. "Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(3), pages 419-436, April.
    4. Umar Burki & Pervin Ersoy & Usama Najam, 2019. "Top Management, Green Innovations, and the Mediating Effect of Customer Cooperation in Green Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    7. Melek Yurdakul & Halim Kazan, 2020. "Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Muhammad Haseeb & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Sebastian Kot & Armenia Androniceanu & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2019. "Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Kuosmanen, Timo & Kuosmanen, Natalia, 2009. "How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 235-243, December.
    10. Elżbieta Sobczak & Dariusz Głuszczuk, 2022. "Diversification of Eco-Innovation and Innovation Activity of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mert Gürlek & Muharrem Tuna, 2018. "Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7-8), pages 467-491, June.
    2. Xiang Ma & Lingli Qing & Young-Seok Ock & Jiao Wu & Yaying Zhou, 2022. "The Effect of Customer Involvement on Green Innovation and the Intermediary Role of Boundary Spanning Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Larbi-Siaw, Otu & Xuhua, Hu & Owusu, Ebenezer & Owusu-Agyeman, Abigail & Fulgence, Brou Ettien & Frimpong, Samuel Akwasi, 2022. "Eco-innovation, sustainable business performance and market turbulence moderation in emerging economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Paulius Šūmakaris & Renata Korsakienė & Deniss Ščeulovs, 2021. "Determinants of Energy Efficient Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Chen Liu & Dongmin Kong, 2021. "Business strategy and sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 657-670, January.
    6. Iftikhar, Anas & Purvis, Laura & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2021. "A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 408-425.
    7. Hang Wu & Yiying Qu, 2021. "How Do Firms Promote Green Innovation through International Mergers and Acquisitions: The Moderating Role of Green Image and Green Subsidy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Andersén, Jim, 2021. "A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Spyridon A. Bafas & Alexandra P. Alexandropoulou & Andreas E. Fousteris & Eleni A. Didaskalou & Dimitrios A. Georgakellos, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Business Strategies: An Exploratory Study of Greek Businesses," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Ying Guo, 2023. "External Knowledge Acquisition and Green Innovation in Chinese Firms: Unveiling the Impact of Green Dynamic Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    11. Feifei Yu & Dong Jiang & Teng Wang, 2022. "The impact of green innovation on manufacturing small and medium enterprises corporate social responsibility fulfillment: The moderating role of regional environmental regulation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 712-727, May.
    12. Ying Guo & Lifang Wang, 2022. "Environmental Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Environmental Innovation and Stakeholder Pressure," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, February.
    13. Xingwei Li & Jianguo Du & Hongyu Long, 2020. "Understanding the Green Development Behavior and Performance of Industrial Enterprises (GDBP-IE): Scale Development and Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Vicente López-López & Susana Iglesias-Antelo & Esteban Fernández, 2020. "Is Sustainable Performance Explained by Firm Effect in Small Business?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Ching‐Hsun Chang & Meng‐Yi Shih & Hsin‐Ju Peng, 2022. "Enhancing entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: Relationships among green innovative capability, green relational capability, and co‐innovation behavior," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1358-1368, May.
    16. Zhang, Xuejiao & Huang, Shoufeng & Li, Wanfu & Wang, Yu, 2023. "Directors' and officers' liability insurance, environmental regulation and firms' envi ronmental responsibility," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    17. Anteneh Mulugeta Eyasu & Demoz Arefayne, 2020. "The effect of corporate social responsibility on banks’ competitive advantage: Evidence from Ethiopian lion international bank S.C," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1830473-183, January.
    18. Wenhao Song & Shengce Ren & Jun Yu, 2019. "Bridging the gap between corporate social responsibility and new green product success: The role of green organizational identity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 88-97, January.
    19. Ching‐Hsun Chang, 2016. "The Determinants of Green Product Innovation Performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, March.
    20. Sudawan Somjai & Ratchada Fongtanakit & Khomsan Laosillapacharoen, 2020. "Impact of Environmental Commitment, Environmental Management Accounting and Green Innovation on Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 204-210.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7525-:d:843642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.