IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1701-d493481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructed Governance as Solution to Conflicts in E-Waste Recycling Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Fernanda Pedro

    (Department of Administration, Paulista University—UNIP, São Paulo 05353-050, Brazil)

  • Ernesto Giglio

    (Department of Administration, Paulista University—UNIP, São Paulo 05353-050, Brazil)

  • Luis Velazquez

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Sonora, Sonora 83260, Mexico)

  • Nora Munguia

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Sonora, Sonora 83260, Mexico)

Abstract

Electronic waste (e-waste) has become an increasingly pressing problem worldwide because of the increase in the volume of waste, without a corresponding increase in the recycling rate. E-waste recycling models show a low percentage of reuse, at around 17.4% in the world, 11% in Latin America, and 3% in São Paulo City, Brazil. The sources of conflicts relating to e-waste recycling networks are diverse, including asymmetries of objectives, knowledge, ethical values, and culture of sustainability, which indicates the need for a system of regulatory mechanisms. The article’s main proposition is that constructed governance, which is a collective process involving many actors, could be an alternative to e-waste recycling management. The city of São Paulo was chosen to be analyzed. Using an abductive methodology, the data analysis shows a fragmented network, with conflicts of interest among commercial and sustainability objectives, an absence of legal knowledge, and increases in the incorrect disposal of waste. However, initiatives in small groups in Brazil, which can be considered as examples of constructed governance, show a better volume of waste and the transportation of waste material to the right destination. The authors argue that constructed governance could be an efficient tool for e-waste recycling management systems. Besides, the article offers a matrix of indicators that can be used by both researchers and recycling managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernanda Pedro & Ernesto Giglio & Luis Velazquez & Nora Munguia, 2021. "Constructed Governance as Solution to Conflicts in E-Waste Recycling Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1701-:d:493481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samantha E. Cruz-Sotelo & Sara Ojeda-Benítez & Jorge Jáuregui Sesma & Karla I. Velázquez-Victorica & Néstor Santillán-Soto & O. Rafael García-Cueto & Víctor Alcántara Concepción & Camilo Alcántara, 2017. "E-Waste Supply Chain in Mexico: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Martin Mathews, 2018. "Managing local supplier networks: conflict or compromise?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 890-900, July.
    3. Daniela Cordova-Pizarro & Ismael Aguilar-Barajas & David Romero & Ciro A. Rodriguez, 2019. "Circular Economy in the Electronic Products Sector: Material Flow Analysis and Economic Impact of Cellphone E-Waste in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Matthew Carmona, 2017. "The formal and informal tools of design governance," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 1-36, January.
    5. Florin Constantin Mihai & Maria-Grazie Gnoni & Christia Meidiana & Chukwunonye Ezeah & Valerio Elia, 2019. "Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): Flows, Quantities, and Management—A Global Scenario," Post-Print hal-02276468, HAL.
    6. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Harbir Singh & William S. Hesterly, 2018. "The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3140-3162, December.
    7. Chirag Shah & Gary Marchionini, 2010. "Awareness in collaborative information seeking," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(10), pages 1970-1986, October.
    8. Chirag Shah & Gary Marchionini, 2010. "Awareness in collaborative information seeking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(10), pages 1970-1986, October.
    9. Alex Gorod & Leonie Hallo & Tiep Nguyen, 2018. "A Systemic Approach to Complex Project Management: Integration of Command‐and‐Control and Network Governance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 811-837, November.
    10. Anna Grandori, 1997. "Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 1(1), pages 29-47, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hilal Shams & Altaf Hossain Molla & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Hawa Hishamuddin & Zambri Harun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2023. "Exploring Industry-Specific Research Themes on E-Waste: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camelia Delcea & Liliana Crăciun & Corina Ioanăș & Gabriella Ferruzzi & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas, 2020. "Determinants of Individuals’ E-Waste Recycling Decision: A Case Study from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Vera Granikov & Reem El Sherif & France Bouthillier & Pierre Pluye, 2022. "Factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking: A mixed studies review with a framework synthesis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 542-560, April.
    3. Samuel Abalansa & Badr El Mahrad & John Icely & Alice Newton, 2021. "Electronic Waste, an Environmental Problem Exported to Developing Countries: The GOOD, the BAD and the UGLY," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Van Wijk, Raymond & Nadolska, Anna, 2020. "Making more of alliance portfolios: The role of alliance portfolio coordination," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 388-399.
    5. David E. Cantor & Tingting Yan & Mark Pagell & Wendy L. Tate, 2022. "From the editors: Introduction to the emerging discourse incubator on the topic of leveraging multiple types of resources within the supply network for competitive advantage," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 3-7, April.
    6. Maniyassouwe Amana & Pingfeng Liu & Mona Alariqi, 2022. "Value Creation and Capture with Big Data in Smart Phones Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Shimei Jiang & Yimei Hu & Ziyuan Wang, 2019. "Core Firm Based View on the Mechanism of Constructing an Enterprise Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Haier Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Steffen Runge & Christian Schwens & Matthias Schulz, 2022. "The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 266-294, February.
    9. Shen, Huijun & Coreynen, Wim & Huang, Can, 2022. "Exclusive licensing of university technology: The effects of university prestige, technology transfer offices, and academy-industry collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    10. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Ratzmann, Martin & Kraus, Sascha, 2021. "Anti-aging: How innovation is shaped by firm age and mutual knowledge creation in an alliance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 422-429.
    11. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Fredrich, Viktor & Kraus, Sascha & Ritala, Paavo, 2020. "Innovation alliances: Balancing value creation dynamics, competitive intensity and market overlap," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 240-247.
    12. Chenyu Lu & Yang Zhang & Hengji Li & Zilong Zhang & Wei Cheng & Shulei Jin & Wei Liu, 2020. "An Integrated Measurement of the Efficiency of China’s Industrial Circular Economy and Associated Influencing Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Horațiu Vermeșan & Ancuța-Elena Tiuc & Marius Purcar, 2019. "Advanced Recovery Techniques for Waste Materials from IT and Telecommunication Equipment Printed Circuit Boards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Omid Mehri Namakavarani & Abbas Ali Daryaei & Davood Askarany & Saeed Askary, 2021. "Audit Committee Characteristics and Quality of Financial Information: The Role of the Internal Information Environment and Political Connections," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Anindya Ghosh & Thomas Klueter, 2022. "The Role of Frictions due to Top Management in Alliance Termination Decisions: Insights from Established Bio‐Pharmaceutical Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1315-1353, July.
    16. Dan Trudeau, 2020. "Disparate Projects, Coherent Practices: Constructing New Urbanism through the Charter Awards," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 429-440.
    17. Khorshed Alam & Mohammad Afshar Ali & Michael Erdiaw-Kwasie & Md Shahiduzzaman & Eswaran Velayutham & Peter A. Murray & Retha Wiesner, 2022. "Impact of ICTs on Innovation and Performance of Firms: Do Start-ups, Regional Proximity and Skills Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Venkatesha Murthy & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2022. "A Review on Global E-Waste Management: Urban Mining towards a Sustainable Future and Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Daniel Baratieri Valente & Ricardo César da Silva Guabiroba & Marco Antonio Conejero & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira Silva & Aldara da Silva César, 2021. "Economic analysis of waste electrical and electronic equipment management: a study involving recycling cooperatives in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17628-17649, December.
    20. Sohani Vihanga Withanage & Komal Habib, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment and Material Flow Analysis: Two Under-Utilized Tools for Informing E-Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1701-:d:493481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.