IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v100y2021ics0264837720316872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post planning-decision process: Ensuring the delivery of high-quality developments in Cardiff

Author

Listed:
  • Dickinson, Daniella
  • Shahab, Sina

Abstract

Housing development is a lengthy and multi-step process; starting from the initial stages of a planning permission proposal to when a proposal is realised on-site. Each stage seemingly impacts how developments are delivered; however, research is limited into why quality of development has been seen to weaken in the post planning-decision stage (i.e. the stage after a planning permission is granted). This paper uses a case study of Cardiff to explore whether the key stages of the UK development management process could be improved to influence the delivery of high-quality housing developments. Using semi-structured interviews, this paper investigates the perceptions of planning professionals towards the requirement and applicability of improved methods, covering the following issues: a) the role of key actors in influencing outcomes during the development management process; b) the factors hindering implementation of high-quality housing developments; and c) how involved actors can improve the delivery of housing developments. The findings of the paper show that involved actors principally perceive inadequate local authority resource, limited enforcement powers, and a lack of on-site monitoring to be key hinderances in ensuring developer compliance, which to an extent, has a bearing on the implementation of high-quality developments. Furthermore, a difference in attitudes and knowledge towards development aspirations is uncovered, which reveals to have a considerable influence on the outcome of development quality. However, where resource may be available, some mechanisms are proposed by planning professionals as potential key factors in improving the post planning-decision process.

Suggested Citation

  • Dickinson, Daniella & Shahab, Sina, 2021. "Post planning-decision process: Ensuring the delivery of high-quality developments in Cardiff," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720316872
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720316872
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gavin Parker & Emma Street & Matthew Wargent, 2018. "The Rise of the Private Sector in Fragmentary Planning in England," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 734-750, October.
    2. Matthew Carmona, 2017. "The formal and informal tools of design governance," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 1-36, January.
    3. Carolyn G. Loh & Richard K. Norton, 2013. "Planning Consultants and Local Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(2), pages 138-147, April.
    4. Matthew Wargent & Gavin Parker & Emma Street, 2020. "Public-private entanglements: consultant use by local planning authorities in England," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 192-210, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiqing Yan & Zisheng Yang, 2022. "How the Marketization of Land Transfer under the Constraint of Dual Goals Affects the High-Quality Development of Urban Economy: Empirical Evidence from 278 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Grace Sadler & Sina Shahab, 2021. "Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding Registers in England: A Transaction-Cost and Effectiveness Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Joseph Morgan & Sina Shahab, 2023. "Impact of Land Value Tax on the Equity of Planning Outcomes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surajit Chakravarty & Mohammed S Bin Mansoor & Bibek Kumar & Priya Seetharaman, 2023. "Challenges of consultant-led planning in India’s smart cities mission," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(5), pages 1375-1393, June.
    2. Johannes Herburger & Nicola Hilti & Eva Lingg, 2022. "Negotiating Vertical Urbanization at the Public–Private Nexus: On the Institutional Embeddedness of Planning Committees," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 253-266.
    3. Dan Trudeau, 2020. "Disparate Projects, Coherent Practices: Constructing New Urbanism through the Charter Awards," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 429-440.
    4. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo & Lorena Fiorini & Cristina Montaldi, 2022. "Micromunicipality (MM) and Inner Areas in Italy: A Challenge for National Land Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Martin Bortz, 2023. "Advice that resonates: explaining the variability in consultants’ policy influence," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 211-232, June.
    6. Jason Slade & Malcolm Tait & Andy Inch, 2022. "‘We need to put what we do in my dad’s language, in pounds, shillings and pence’: Commercialisation and the reshaping of public-sector planning in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 397-413, February.
    7. Cheonjae Lee & Walter Timo de Vries & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2019. "Land Governance Re-Arrangements: The One-Country One-System (OCOS) Versus One-Country Two-System (OCTS) Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Yongcheng Wang & Yiik Diew Wong & Kelvin Goh, 2021. "Perceived importance of inclusive street dimensions: a public questionnaire survey from a vision(ing) perspective," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 699-721, April.
    9. Norton, Richard K. & David, Nina P. & Buckman, Stephen & Koman, Patricia D., 2018. "Overlooking the coast: Limited local planning for coastal area management along Michigan’s Great Lakes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 183-203.
    10. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    11. James Charlton & Ian Babelon & Richard Watson & Caitlin Hafferty, 2023. "Phygitally Smarter? A Critically Pragmatic Agenda for Smarter Engagement in British Planning and Beyond," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 17-31.
    12. Li Pernegger, 2021. "Effects of the state’s informal practices on organisational capability and social inclusion: Three cases of city governance in Johannesburg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1193-1210, May.
    13. Raco, Mike & Ward, Callum & Brill, Frances & Sanderson, Danielle & Freire-Trigo, Sonia & Ferm, Jess & Hamiduddin, Iqbal & Livingstone, Nicola, 2022. "Towards a virtual statecraft: housing targets and the governance of urban housing markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114315, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Edgars Pudzis & Sanda Geipele & Armands Auzins & Andrejs Lazdins & Jevgenija Butnicka & Krista Krumina & Indra Ciuksa & Maris Kalinka & Una Krutova & Mark Grimitliht & Marii Prii-Pärn & Charlotta Björ, 2021. "Evaluation of Formal and Informal Spatial Coastal Area Planning Process in Baltic Sea Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Mishra Ankit, 2019. "The Process of Informal Spatial Planning: A Literature Overview," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 216-227, January.
    16. Fernanda Pedro & Ernesto Giglio & Luis Velazquez & Nora Munguia, 2021. "Constructed Governance as Solution to Conflicts in E-Waste Recycling Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Eckl, Julian & Hanrieder, Tine, 2023. "The political economy of consulting firms in reform processes: the case of the World Health Organization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117917, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s0264837720316872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.