IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v50y2023i5p1375-1393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges of consultant-led planning in India’s smart cities mission

Author

Listed:
  • Surajit Chakravarty
  • Mohammed S Bin Mansoor
  • Bibek Kumar
  • Priya Seetharaman

Abstract

The growing involvement of private-sector consultants in urban planning has been critiqued as a potential problem, mainly due to doubts over their ethical position. India’s Smart Cities Mission which aims to equip 100 cities with smart technologies, relies on private consultants both to plan the interventions and to implement them. With the planning phase now complete, and implementation in its early stages, this study examines the proposals generated by the consultants. The study deploys natural language processing computational techniques to compare a large corpus of text extracted from the proposal documents to a framework of common planning terms. The analysis yields insights regarding the consultants’ “styles,†and the evolution of the proposals over four rounds of selection. Findings suggest that some consultants show better results than others, but as many as a third of the reports prepared for the mission have low scores on the study’s metrics. In addition, a close reading of the program design helps understand the institutional context within which consultants are embedded. The paper concludes with recommendations for closer scrutiny of the consultants’ work within the mission.

Suggested Citation

  • Surajit Chakravarty & Mohammed S Bin Mansoor & Bibek Kumar & Priya Seetharaman, 2023. "Challenges of consultant-led planning in India’s smart cities mission," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(5), pages 1375-1393, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:5:p:1375-1393
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221137078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221137078
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221137078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. EW Stapper & M Van der Veen & LB Janssen-Jansen, 2020. "Consultants as intermediaries: Their perceptions on citizen involvement in urban development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(1), pages 60-78, February.
    2. Gavin Parker & Emma Street & Matthew Wargent, 2018. "The Rise of the Private Sector in Fragmentary Planning in England," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 734-750, October.
    3. Simon Joss & Frans Sengers & Daan Schraven & Federico Caprotti & Youri Dayot, 2019. "The Smart City as Global Discourse: Storylines and Critical Junctures across 27 Cities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 3-34, January.
    4. Mickey Lauria & Mellone F. Long, 2019. "Ethical Dilemmas in Professional Planning Practice in the United States," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(4), pages 393-404, October.
    5. Juliana M. Zanotto, 2019. "Detachment in Planning Practice," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 37-52, January.
    6. Robert Cowley & Simon Joss & Youri Dayot, 2018. "The smart city and its publics: insights from across six UK cities," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 53-77, January.
    7. Enora Robin & Frances Brill, 2018. "The global politics of an urban age: creating 'cities for all' in the age of financialisation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-5, December.
    8. Kristian Hoelscher, 2016. "The evolution of the smart cities agenda in India," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 19(1), pages 28-44, March.
    9. Carolyn G. Loh & Rodney L. Arroyo, 2017. "Special Ethical Considerations for Planners in Private Practice," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 168-179, April.
    10. Matthew Wargent & Gavin Parker & Emma Street, 2020. "Public-private entanglements: consultant use by local planning authorities in England," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 192-210, January.
    11. Jason Miklian & Kristian Hoelscher, 2017. "Smart Cities, Mobile Technologies and Social Cohesion in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Morgan Mouton, 2021. "Worlding infrastructure in the global South: Philippine experiments and the art of being ‘smart’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 621-638, February.
    13. Simon Joss & Matthew Cook & Youri Dayot, 2017. "Smart Cities: Towards a New Citizenship Regime? A Discourse Analysis of the British Smart City Standard," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 29-49, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Dickinson, Daniella & Shahab, Sina, 2021. "Post planning-decision process: Ensuring the delivery of high-quality developments in Cardiff," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Trencher, Gregory, 2019. "Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 117-128.
    5. Khushboo Gupta & Wenwen Zhang & Ralph P Hall, 2021. "Risk priorities and their co-occurrences in smart city project implementation: Evidence from India’s Smart Cities Mission (SCM)," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 880-894, May.
    6. Negar Noori & Thomas Hoppe & Martin de Jong, 2020. "Classifying Pathways for Smart City Development: Comparing Design, Governance and Implementation in Amsterdam, Barcelona, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Kitchin, Rob & Cardullo, Paolo & Di Feliciantonio, Cesare, 2018. "Citizenship, Justice and the Right to the Smart City," SocArXiv b8aq5, Center for Open Science.
    8. Deepak Kumar, 2023. "The Conception and Discourse of Smart City," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 7(1), pages 71-84, March.
    9. Daniel S. Oh, 2019. "Building Inter-Personal Competence in Architecture and Urban Design Students through Smart Cities at a Higher Education Institution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Jason Slade & Malcolm Tait & Andy Inch, 2022. "‘We need to put what we do in my dad’s language, in pounds, shillings and pence’: Commercialisation and the reshaping of public-sector planning in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 397-413, February.
    11. Maria Spiliotopoulou & Mark Roseland, 2020. "Urban Sustainability: From Theory Influences to Practical Agendas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Aisha Sobey, 2023. "Obliged smart freedom: The Singaporean experience of advanced neoliberal-developmental governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3336-3352, December.
    13. Natalya KOSTKO & Mariya BATYREVA & Irina PECHERKINA & Oksana LAZAREVA, 2021. "Are Smart Technologies An Instrument Of Active City Dwellers?," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(3), pages 73-91, August.
    14. Nancy Odendaal, 2021. "Everyday urbanisms and the importance of place: Exploring the elements of the emancipatory smart city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 639-654, February.
    15. Demokaan Demirel, 2023. "The Impact of Managing Diversity on Building the Smart City A Comparison of Smart City Strategies: Cases From Europe, America, and Asia," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    16. Lim, Chiehyeon & Cho, Gi-Hyoug & Kim, Jeongseob, 2021. "Understanding the linkages of smart-city technologies and applications: Key lessons from a text mining approach and a call for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Paola Panuccio, 2019. "Smart Planning: From City to Territorial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Johannes Herburger & Nicola Hilti & Eva Lingg, 2022. "Negotiating Vertical Urbanization at the Public–Private Nexus: On the Institutional Embeddedness of Planning Committees," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 253-266.
    19. Caprotti, Federico & Liu, Dong, 2020. "Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:5:p:1375-1393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.