IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v73y2022i4p542-560.html

Factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking: A mixed studies review with a framework synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Vera Granikov
  • Reem El Sherif
  • France Bouthillier
  • Pierre Pluye

Abstract

Despite being necessary, keeping up to date with new information and trends remains challenging in many fields due to information overload, time constraints, and insufficient evaluation skills. Collaboration, or sharing the effort among group members, may be a solution, but more knowledge is needed. To guide future research on the potential role of collaboration in keeping up to date, we conducted a systematic literature review with a framework synthesis aimed to adapt the conceptual framework for environmental scanning to a collaborative context. Our specific objectives were to identify the factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking (CIS) and use them to propose an adapted conceptual framework. Fifty‐one empirical studies were included and synthesized using a hybrid thematic synthesis. The adapted framework includes seven types of influencing factors and five types of outcomes. Our review contributes to the theoretical expansion of knowledge on CIS in general and provides a conceptual framework to study collaboration in keeping up to date. Overall, our findings will be useful to researchers, practitioners, team leaders, and system designers implementing and evaluating collaborative information projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Vera Granikov & Reem El Sherif & France Bouthillier & Pierre Pluye, 2022. "Factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking: A mixed studies review with a framework synthesis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 542-560, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:4:p:542-560
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24596
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald O. Case & Lisa G. O'Connor, 2016. "What's the use? Measuring the frequency of studies of information outcomes," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(3), pages 649-661, March.
    2. Raya Fidel & Annelise Mark Pejtersen & Bryan Cleal & Harry Bruce, 2004. "A multidimensional approach to the study of human‐information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(11), pages 939-953, September.
    3. Yihan Tao & Anastasios Tombros, 2017. "How collaborators make sense of tasks together: A comparative analysis of collaborative sensemaking behavior in collaborative information-seeking tasks," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(3), pages 609-622, March.
    4. Nathan J. McNeese & Madhu C. Reddy, 2017. "The role of team cognition in collaborative information seeking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(1), pages 129-140, January.
    5. Chirag Shah & Gary Marchionini, 2010. "Awareness in collaborative information seeking," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(10), pages 1970-1986, October.
    6. Chirag Shah, 2013. "Effects of awareness on coordination in collaborative information seeking," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(6), pages 1122-1143, June.
    7. Lokman I. Meho & Helen R. Tibbo, 2003. "Modeling the information‐seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(6), pages 570-587, April.
    8. Chirag Shah, 2013. "Effects of awareness on coordination in collaborative information seeking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(6), pages 1122-1143, June.
    9. Chirag Shah, 2014. "Collaborative information seeking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(2), pages 215-236, February.
    10. Allen Foster, 2004. "A nonlinear model of information‐seeking behavior," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(3), pages 228-237, February.
    11. Murat Karamuftuoglu, 1998. "Collaborative information retrieval: Toward a social informatics view of IR interaction," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 49(12), pages 1070-1080.
    12. Abu Shamim Mohammad Arif & Jia Tina Du & Ivan Lee, 2015. "Understanding tourists' collaborative information retrieval behavior to inform design," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(11), pages 2285-2303, November.
    13. Sheila Pontis & Ann Blandford & Elke Greifeneder & Hesham Attalla & David Neal, 2017. "Keeping up to date: An academic researcher's information journey," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(1), pages 22-35, January.
    14. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Chirag Shah & Gary Marchionini, 2010. "Awareness in collaborative information seeking," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(10), pages 1970-1986, October.
    16. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernanda Pedro & Ernesto Giglio & Luis Velazquez & Nora Munguia, 2021. "Constructed Governance as Solution to Conflicts in E-Waste Recycling Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Franklin Riley & David K. Allen & Thomas Daniel Wilson, 2022. "When politicians and the experts collide: Organization and the creation of information spheres," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1127-1139, August.
    3. Ben Krishna & Anindita Paul, 2020. "Collaborative information behaviour during epidemics: The case of Nipah outbreak in Southern India," Working papers 367, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    4. Lo Lee & Melissa G. Ocepek & Stephann Makri, 2022. "Information behavior patterns: A new theoretical perspective from an empirical study of naturalistic information acquisition," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 594-608, April.
    5. Murray, Janet Y. & Zhang-Zhang, Yingying, 2018. "Insights on women’s labor participation in Gulf Cooperation Council countries," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 711-720.
    6. Bagheri, Afsaneh & Chitsazan, Hasti & Ebrahimi, Ashkan, 2019. "Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 218-232.
    7. Iacus Stefano M. & Salini Silvia & Siletti Elena & Porro Giuseppe, 2020. "Controlling for Selection Bias in Social Media Indicators through Official Statistics: a Proposal," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 315-338, June.
    8. Wesam Fallatah & Joakim Kävrestad & Steven Furnell, 2024. "Establishing a Model for the User Acceptance of Cybersecurity Training," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Muhammad Ihtisham & Muhammad Khayyam & Sohaib Ismail, 2021. "Current Progress and Future Prospects of Agriculture Technology: Gateway to Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-31, April.
    10. Shaikh Moksadur Rahman, 2020. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Business Review, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 10(2), pages 99-108.
    11. Maryam Mohamed AlBastaki & Mohammed Youssif Abu Keir & Ahmed Mohammed Arbab, 2019. "Human Resources Management Practices and Employees' Performance in Bahrain Airport Services Company," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 61-79, December.
    12. Chien-Chi Chu & Ya-Fang Cheng & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Kun-Hwa Lu, 2019. "Open Innovation in Crowdfunding Context: Diversity, Knowledge, and Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Shladover, Steven E. & Nowakowski, Christopher & Lu, Xiao-Yun, 2018. "Using Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC)to Form High-Performance Vehicle Streams. Definitions, Literature Review and Operational Concept Alternatives," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3w6920wz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Saeideh Bakhshi & Eric Gilbert, 2015. "Red, Purple and Pink: The Colors of Diffusion on Pinterest," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Mi (Jamie) Zhou & Baozhou Lu & Weiguo (Patrick) Fan & G. Alan Wang, 2018. "Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 259-274, April.
    16. Islam, Samiha & Jaffee, Sara R., 2024. "Social mobility and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    17. Zhiming Liu & Haiwei Jia, 2022. "What Drives the Development and Sustainable Growth of Cultural Nonprofits—Chinese Province-Level Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Miao, Lijuan & Sun, Zhanli & Ren, Yanjun & Schierhorn, Florian & Müller, Daniel, 2021. "Grassland greening on the Mongolian Plateau despite higher grazing intensity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 792-802.
    19. Bing Wu & Xinping Yan & Yang Wang & C. Guedes Soares, 2017. "An Evidential Reasoning‐Based CREAM to Human Reliability Analysis in Maritime Accident Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1936-1957, October.
    20. Francesca Bettio & Marina Della Giusta & Maria Laura Di Tommaso & Sarah Jewell, 2016. "Stigmatising Prostitution: Some Evidence from the UK," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2016-13, Department of Economics, University of Reading.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:4:p:542-560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.