IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13069-d688023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing Macro-Level Uncertainties for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains of Demolition Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama

    (UniSA STEM: Circular Economy and Scare Resources (ScaRCE), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Nicholas Chileshe

    (UniSA STEM: Circular Economy and Scare Resources (ScaRCE), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
    Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa)

  • Raufdeen Rameezdeen

    (UniSA STEM: Circular Economy and Scare Resources (ScaRCE), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Jose Jorge Ochoa

    (Australian Research Centre for Interactive and Virtual Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; Jorge.OchoaPaniagua@unisa.edu.au)

Abstract

In light of the increasing detrimental effects on sustainability, the reverse logistics supply chain (RLSC) has emerged as one of the remedies in the construction industry, whereby the bulk of demolition waste (DW) is returned into the production cycle. Quality assurance (QA) plays an important role in RLSCs, which needs an information-rich environment enriched with external stakeholders’ influence strategies. However, due to ineffective external stakeholders’ influence, useful information is not available, making macro-level uncertainties for QA. Given this, the current study aimed to identify the macro-level uncertainties for QA in the RLSC of DW. The study used a qualitative approach involving 21 semi-structured interviews representing five external stakeholder categories. The study found the regulatory uncertainties are the root causes that propagate through incentivizing and contractual uncertainties to influence QA in the RLSC. The external stakeholders could employ measures such as ‘reforming regulatory instruments’, ‘employing effective incentivizing schemes’ and ‘active involvement of forward supply chain actors’ to minimize uncertainties at their source. The external and internal stakeholders can use these findings as a roadmap to determine suitable measures to overcome macro-level uncertainties in the RLSC. Furthermore, the study paved an avenue to integrate stakeholder theory and organizational information processing theory (OIPT) in future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama & Nicholas Chileshe & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Jose Jorge Ochoa, 2021. "Minimizing Macro-Level Uncertainties for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains of Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13069-:d:688023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kembro, Joakim & Näslund, Dag & Olhager, Jan, 2017. "Information sharing across multiple supply chain tiers: A Delphi study on antecedents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 77-86.
    2. NNC Pushpamali & Duzgun Agdas & Timothy M. Rose & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Stakeholder perception of reverse logistics practices on supply chain performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 60-70, January.
    3. Sunil Kulkarni, 2020. "Studies, Efforts and Investigations on Various Aspects of Solid Waste Management with Emphasis on Developing Countries," Chapters, in: Surendra N. Kulshreshtha (ed.), Sustainability Concept In Developing Countries, IntechOpen.
    4. Jonathan P. Doh & Terrence R. Guay, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional‐Stakeholder Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 47-73, January.
    5. Fu, Qiang & Lu, Jingfeng & Lu, Yuanzhu, 2012. "Incentivizing R&D: Prize or subsidies?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 67-79.
    6. Jessica L. Darby & David J. Ketchen & Brent D. Williams & Travis Tokar, 2020. "The Implications of Firm‐Specific Policy Risk, Policy Uncertainty, and Industry Factors for Inventory: A Resource Dependence Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 3-24, October.
    7. NNC Pushpamali & Duzgun Agdas & Timothy M. Rose, 2019. "A Review of Reverse Logistics: An Upstream Construction Supply Chain Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Duan, Huabo & Wang, Jiayuan & Huang, Qifei, 2015. "Encouraging the environmentally sound management of C&D waste in China: An integrative review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 611-620.
    9. Volker H. Hoffmann & Thomas Trautmann & Jens Hamprecht, 2009. "Regulatory Uncertainty: A Reason to Postpone Investments? Not Necessarily," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7), pages 1227-1253, November.
    10. Barbara B. Flynn & Xenophon Koufteros & Guanyi Lu, 2016. "On Theory in Supply Chain Uncertainty and its Implications for Supply Chain Integration," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 3-27, July.
    11. M. Bensaou & N. Venkatraman, 1995. "Configurations of Interorganizational Relationships: A Comparison Between U.S. and Japanese Automakers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(9), pages 1471-1492, September.
    12. Neil Oschlag-Michael & Surja Datta, 2015. "Developing Uncertainty and Trust Constructs," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Understanding and Managing IT Outsourcing: A Partnership Approach, chapter 4, pages 53-69, Palgrave Macmillan.
    13. Christian Busse & Jan Meinlschmidt & Kai Foerstl, 2017. "Managing Information Processing Needs in Global Supply Chains: A Prerequisite to Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(1), pages 87-113, January.
    14. Surja Datta & Neil Oschlag-Michael, 2015. "Understanding and Managing IT Outsourcing: A Partnership Approach," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-49732-1.
    15. Rodriguez Lopez, Juan Miguel & Sakhel, Alice & Busch, Timo, 2017. "Corporate investments and environmental regulation: The role of regulatory uncertainty, regulation-induced uncertainty, and investment history," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 91-101.
    16. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2015. "A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 76-92.
    17. Stephen Ward & Chris Chapman, 2008. "Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 563-577.
    18. Maartje Bodde & Karin Van der Wel & Peter Driessen & Arjan Wardekker & Hens Runhaar, 2018. "Strategies for Dealing with Uncertainties in Strategic Environmental Assessment: An Analytical Framework Illustrated with Case Studies from The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama & Nicholas Chileshe & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Jose Jorge Ochoa, 2022. "Information Processing for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains: An Organizational Information Processing Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, May.
    2. Raymond Markey & Joseph McIvor & Martin O’Brien & Chris F Wright, 2021. "Triggering business responses to climate policy in Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(2), pages 248-271, May.
    3. Rong, Ke & Sun, Hui & Li, Dun & Zhou, Di, 2021. "Matching as Service Provision of Sharing Economy Platforms: An Information Processing Perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Haehl, Christian & Spinler, Stefan, 2020. "Technology Choice under Emission Regulation Uncertainty in International Container Shipping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 383-396.
    5. Ming Che & Hongmei Wu & Yujia Li, 2023. "Do Fluctuations in Environmental Regulations Inhibit Investment: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Iain J. Fraser & Martin Müller & Julia Schwarzkopf, 2020. "Transparency for Multi-Tier Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Case Study of a Multi-tier Transparency Approach for SSCM in the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Ghazi M. Magableh & Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi, 2023. "Global Supply Chain Nervousness (GSCN)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Jia, Fu & Blome, Constantin & Sun, Hui & Yang, Yang & Zhi, Bangdong, 2020. "Towards an integrated conceptual framework of supply chain finance: An information processing perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 18-30.
    9. Xu, Yongan & Li, Ming & Yan, Wen & Bai, Jiancheng, 2022. "Predictability of the renewable energy market returns: The informational gains from the climate policy uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Wagner, Stephan M. & Grosse-Ruyken, Pan Theo & Erhun, Feryal, 2018. "Determinants of sourcing flexibility and its impact on performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 329-341.
    11. David C. Hall & Tracy D. Johnson-Hall, 2021. "The value of downstream traceability in food safety management systems: an empirical examination of product recalls," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 61-77, June.
    12. Hu, Yingde & Bai, Wensong & Farrukh, Muhammad & Koo, Chun Kwong, 2023. "How does environmental policy uncertainty influence corporate green investments?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Rana, Mohammad B. & Elo, Maria, 2017. "Transnational Diaspora and Civil Society Actors Driving MNE Internationalisation: The Case of Grameenphone in Bangladesh," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 87-106.
    14. Dirk Boehe & Luciano Barin Cruz, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 325-346, February.
    15. Natalie Slawinski & Jonatan Pinkse & Timo Busch & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjeed, 2014. "The role of short-termism and uncertainty in organizational inaction on climate change: multilevel framework," Working Papers hal-00961226, HAL.
    16. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    17. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    18. Sören Wallbach & Katrin Coleman & Ralf Elbert & Alexander Benlian, 2019. "Multi-sided platform diffusion in competitive B2B networks: inhibiting factors and their impact on network effects," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 693-710, December.
    19. Ben-Ammar, Oussama & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Optimization of multi-period supply planning under stochastic lead times and a dynamic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 106-117.
    20. David E. Cantor & Tingting Yan & Mark Pagell & Wendy L. Tate, 2022. "From the editors: Introduction to the emerging discourse incubator on the topic of leveraging multiple types of resources within the supply network for competitive advantage," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 3-7, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13069-:d:688023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.