IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12927-d685169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Serial Multiple Mediation of the Impact of Customer Knowledge Management on Sustainable Product Innovation by Innovative Work Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin Bratianu

    (UNESCO Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business Administration, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana 6, Sector 1, 010731 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Dan Florin Stanescu

    (Department of Communication, Faculty of Communication and Public Relations, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Blvd. Expozitiei 30A, Sector 1, 012104 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Rares Mocanu

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Blvd. Expozitiei 30A, Sector 1, 012104 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ruxandra Bejinaru

    (Department of Management, Business Administration and Tourism, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, “Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Str. Universitatii 13, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

Customer knowledge management (CKM) is a relatively new research domain, aiming at exploring the potential of customer knowledge for the open innovation process of companies. The present paper aims at performing a complex analysis of the serial mediation phenomenon of the impact of CKM on sustainable product innovation (SPI) by innovative work behavior (IWB). The dimensions considered for IWB in the present research are the following: idea exploration, idea generation, idea championing, and idea implementation. In the first phase of our research, we performed a semantic analysis of the main concepts, ideas, and theories, based on a critical literature review. Thus, we reached a deeper understanding of the complexity of the concept of knowledge by learning the theory of knowledge fields and knowledge dynamics. As a result of this conceptual phase, we designed the research model and a questionnaire to be addressed to managers from the business environment. In the quantitative phase of the present research, we used the statistical software packages, SPSS version 26.0, and the PROCESS macro for SPSS, version 3.5. We used well-known criteria for reliability, validation, and interpretation of the numerical results. The final results demonstrate a significant serial mediation phenomenon regarding the impact of CKM on SPI by the IWB. These results are important in developing the co-creation process of new products by using customer knowledge. The present research reveals some original ideas concerning the impact of CKM on SPI by using a serial mediation process performed by basic innovative work dimensions. The implications of the present research are significant for both academics and practitioners in designing open innovation in knowledge ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin Bratianu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Rares Mocanu & Ruxandra Bejinaru, 2021. "Serial Multiple Mediation of the Impact of Customer Knowledge Management on Sustainable Product Innovation by Innovative Work Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12927-:d:685169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gibbert, Michael & Leibold, Marius & Probst, Gilbert, 2002. "Five Styles of Customer Knowledge Management, and How Smart Companies Use Them To Create Value," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 459-469, October.
    2. Salomann, Harald & Dous, Malte & Kolbe, Lutz & Brenner, Walter, 2005. "Rejuvenating Customer Management:: How to Make Knowledge For, From and About Customers Work," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 392-403, August.
    3. Jeroen de Jong & Deanne Den Hartog, 2008. "Innovative Work Behaviour: Measurement and Validation," Scales Research Reports H200820, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    4. Jennifer Rowley, 2005. "Customer knowledge management or consumer surveillance," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 100-110.
    5. Hanan Alhaddi, 2015. "Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability: A Literature Review," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 6-10, September.
    6. Constantin Bratianu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Rares Mocanu, 2021. "Exploring the Knowledge Management Impact on Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Woocheol Kim & Jiwon Park, 2017. "Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Fidel, Pilar & Schlesinger, Walesska & Cervera, Amparo, 2015. "Collaborating to innovate: Effects on customer knowledge management and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1426-1428.
    9. Eugenie Byukusenge & John C. Munene, 2017. "Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1368434-136, January.
    10. Paul M. Leonardi, 2014. "Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 796-816, December.
    11. Nicolai J. Foss & Keld Laursen & Torben Pedersen, 2011. "Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 980-999, August.
    12. Jae Hyeung Kang & George T. Solomon & David Y. Choi, 2015. "CEOs' Leadership Styles and Managers' Innovative Behaviour: Investigation of Intervening Effects in an Entrepreneurial Context," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 531-554, June.
    13. Constantin Bratianu, 2021. "Knowledge Management and Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-5, July.
    14. M García-Murillo & H Annabi, 2002. "Customer knowledge management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(8), pages 875-884, August.
    15. Henrich R. Greve & Marc-David L. Seidel, 2015. "The thin red line between success and failure: Path dependence in the diffusion of innovative production technologies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 475-496, April.
    16. Eugene Okyere-Kwakye & Khalil Md Nor, 2011. "Individual Factors and Knowledge Sharing," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 66-72, January.
    17. Ettore Bolisani & Constantin Bratianu, 2018. "Emergent Knowledge Strategies," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, Springer, number 978-3-319-60657-6, March.
    18. Anna S. Cui & Fang Wu, 2016. "Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 516-538, July.
    19. Bratianu Constantin & Prelipcean Gabriela & Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2020. "Exploring the latent variables which support SMEs to become learning organizations," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 154-171, June.
    20. Prabowo, Rudy & Thelwall, Mike, 2009. "Sentiment analysis: A combined approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 143-157.
    21. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 14-36, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constantin Bratianu & Rares Mocanu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Ruxandra Bejinaru, 2023. "The Impact of Knowledge Hiding on Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Mediating Role of Factual Autonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Bożena Kusz & Dariusz Kusz & Iwona Bąk & Maciej Oesterreich & Ludwik Wicki & Grzegorz Zimon, 2022. "Selected Economic Determinants of Labor Profitability in Family Farms in Poland in Relation to Economic Size," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Yu-Hsien Lin, 2022. "Determinants of Green Purchase Intention: The Roles of Green Enjoyment, Green Intrinsic Motivation, and Green Brand Love," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Bikram Pratim Bhuyan & Ravi Tomar & Amar Ramdane Cherif, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Knowledge Representation Techniques in Smart Agriculture (Urban)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-36, November.
    5. Ivana Marić & Ana Aleksić & Maja Knežević, 2022. "Enhancing Sustainable Development: Examining Factors That Foster Creativity and Productivity in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-9, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miao, Yumeng & Du, Rong & Ou, Carol, 2022. "Guanxi circles and light entrepreneurship in social commerce : The roles of mass entrepreneurship climate and technology affordances," Other publications TiSEM f19a203f-abb6-4835-9c34-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Ewa Multan & Bartosz Sobotka, 2022. "Knowledge about Competences Increasing Resilience to Crises in the Modern Business Sector: Results of the Polish University Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Migliaccio Mirella & Francesca Rivetti, 2013. "Client Knowledge Opportunities for a Small Software Firm," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, University of Milano-Bicocca, issue 1 Global .
    4. Eduardo Tomé & Elizaveta Gromova, 2021. "Development of Emergent Knowledge Strategies and New Dynamic Capabilities for Business Education in a Time of Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Behzad Lak & Jalal Rezaeenour, 2017. "Effective Factors of Social Customer Knowledge Management (SCKM) in Organisations: Study of Electronic Service Providers in Iran," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    7. Alessandro Henrique de Souza Miake & Rodrigo Baroni de Carvalho & Marcelo de Rezende Pinto & Alexandre Reis Graeml, 2018. "Customer Knowledge Management (CKM): Model Proposal and Evaluation in a Large Brazilian Higher Education Private Group," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(2), pages 135-151, March.
    8. Juan Mejía Trejo & José Sánchez Gutiérrez & Gonzalo Maldonado Guzman, 2016. "The customer knowledge management and innovation," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 61(3), pages 456-477, Julio-Sep.
    9. Tayyaba Akram & Shen Lei & Muhammad Jamal Haider & Syed Talib Hussain, 2018. "Exploring the Impact of Knowledge Sharing on the Innovative Work Behavior of Employees: A Study in China," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 186-194, March.
    10. Mohsen Behnam & Geoff Dickson & Vahid Delshab & Anna Gerke & Parvaneh Savari Nikou, 2023. "The moderating effect of fan engagement on the relationship between fan knowledge and fan co-creation in social media," Post-Print hal-03969039, HAL.
    11. Wang, Liwen & Jin, Jason Lu & Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Li, Caroline Bingxin & Yin, Eden, 2020. "Does customer participation hurt new product development performance? Customer role, product newness, and conflict," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 246-259.
    12. Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Lijun & Zhang, Tao, 2023. "Involving online community customers in product innovation: The double-edged sword effect," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Bashir, Naheed & Papamichail, K.Nadia & Malik, Khaleel, 2017. "Use of Social Media Applications for Supporting New Product Development Processes in Multinational Corporations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 176-183.
    14. Shakir Hafeez & Li Lin Hong & Bilal Bin Saeed & Bilal Afsar, 2017. "Customer Knowledge Management as a Success Driver for Business in Mobile Sector of Pakistan," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14.
    15. João M. Lopes & José Oliveira, 2022. "The New Times of Social Media Marketing in the B2B Framework," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Diana Chernetska, 2017. "Expanding Frontiers Of Customer Knowledge Management To Sustain Competitive Advantage:The Mediating Role Of Predictive Analytics," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15.
    17. Constantin Bratianu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Rares Mocanu, 2021. "Exploring the Knowledge Management Impact on Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Eiteneyer, Nils & Bendig, David & Brettel, Malte, 2019. "Social capital and the digital crowd: Involving backers to promote new product innovativeness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    19. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2009. "A study on customer, supplier, and competitor knowledge using the knowledge chain model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 488-496.
    20. Chen, Jiawen & Liu, Linlin, 2020. "Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: The mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 151-162.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12927-:d:685169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.