IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12909-d684845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking the Development of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools with the Concept Evolution of Sustainable Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Lihua Liang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Baohua Wen

    (College of Architecture, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Feng Xu

    (College of Architecture, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Jianwei Yan

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Xiangqi Yan

    (College of Architecture, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • S. Ramesh

    (Center of Advanced Manufacturing and Material Processing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Teknologi Brunei, Gadong BE1410, Brunei
    Huanghe Jiaotong University, Zhengzhou 454950, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of materials science and construction technology, the concept of sustainable building (SB) and the Building Sustainability Assessment Tool (BSAT) have also evolved and developed. Understanding the development of BSAT and SB is of great significance to the sustainable development of the construction industry. This research used the bibliometric method to analyze the development and evolution in the relevant literature on SB and BSAT from 1990 to 2021, and the correlations and differences between them were investigated. We found that there are many common trends in the development of research efforts in SB and BSAT: (1) they focused solely on the environment, in the early days, and only later considered economic and social impacts; (2) the scales with which they are concerned continue to expand, from individual buildings to communities and even cities; (3) key areas, such as energy, materials, resources, indoor environmental quality, high-tech applications, adaptability, and concern for people are being given more attention by both SB and BSAT. On the other hand, the difference between them is that SB research focuses on more macro aspects, such as policy, culture, climate change, while BSAT research is more concerned with micro aspects, such as its system of tools. Furthermore, some current research gaps in the BSAT field are identified, clarifying its future research directions. By linking the evolution of the SB concept and the development of the BSAT research field, this review provides a new and valuable perspective for the sustainable assessment of the construction industry, which, itself, is conducive to the sustainable transformation of this industry, which could contribute greatly to the mitigation of global climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Lihua Liang & Baohua Wen & Feng Xu & Jianwei Yan & Xiangqi Yan & S. Ramesh, 2021. "Linking the Development of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools with the Concept Evolution of Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12909-:d:684845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12909/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12909/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peidong Sang & Jinjian Liu & Lin Zhang & Lingqiao Zheng & Haona Yao & Yanjie Wang, 2018. "Effects of Project Manager Competency on Green Construction Performance: The Chinese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Rastogi, Ankush & Choi, Jun-Ki & Hong, Taehoon & Lee, Minhyun, 2017. "Impact of different LEED versions for green building certification and energy efficiency rating system: A Multifamily Midrise case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 732-740.
    3. Umberto Berardi, 2012. "Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(6), pages 411-424, November.
    4. Reed, Mark S. & Fraser, Evan D.G. & Dougill, Andrew J., 2006. "An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 406-418, October.
    5. Peng Wu & Yongze Song & Xin Hu & Xiangyu Wang, 2018. "A Preliminary Investigation of the Transition from Green Building to Green Community: Insights from LEED ND," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Geoffrey Tso & Kelvin Yau & C. Yang, 2011. "Sustainable Development Index in Hong Kong: Approach, Method and Findings," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 93-108, March.
    7. Elena Bernardi & Salvatore Carlucci & Cristina Cornaro & Rolf André Bohne, 2017. "An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Ying Zhang & Jian Kang & Hong Jin, 2018. "A Review of Green Building Development in China from the Perspective of Energy Saving," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Michał Piasecki & Mateusz Kozicki & Szymon Firląg & Anna Goljan & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2018. "The Approach of Including TVOCs Concentration in the Indoor Environmental Quality Model (IEQ)—Case Studies of BREEAM Certified Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Fei Xue & Zhonghua Gou & Stephen Siu Yu Lau, 2016. "Human Factors in Green Office Building Design: The Impact of Workplace Green Features on Health Perceptions in High-Rise High-Density Asian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Zuo, Jian & Pullen, Stephen & Rameezdeen, Raufdeen & Bennetts, Helen & Wang, Yuan & Mao, Guozhu & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Duan, Huabo, 2017. "Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 358-368.
    12. Saeed-Ul Hassan & Peter Haddawy & Jia Zhu, 2014. "A bibliometric study of the world’s research activity in sustainable development and its sub-areas using scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 549-579, May.
    13. Craig S. Thomson & Mohamed A. El-Haram, 2019. "Is the evolution of building sustainability assessment methods promoting the desired sharing of knowledge amongst project stakeholders?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 433-460, August.
    14. Chua, Shing Chyi & Oh, Tick Hui, 2011. "Green progress and prospect in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2850-2861, August.
    15. Igor Martek & M. Reza Hosseini & Asheem Shrestha & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Stewart Seaton, 2018. "The Sustainability Narrative in Contemporary Architecture: Falling Short of Building a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, March.
    16. GhaffarianHoseini, AmirHosein & Dahlan, Nur Dalilah & Berardi, Umberto & GhaffarianHoseini, Ali & Makaremi, Nastaran & GhaffarianHoseini, Mahdiar, 2013. "Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: A review of current theories, implementations and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-17.
    17. Kuo, Chung-Feng Jeffrey & Lin, Chieh-Hung & Hsu, Ming-Wen, 2016. "Analysis of intelligent green building policy and developing status in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 291-303.
    18. AbdelAzim, Ahmed Ibrahim & Ibrahim, Ahmed Mohamed & Aboul-Zahab, Essam Mohamed, 2017. "Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using Analytic Hierarchy Process – The case of Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 414-425.
    19. Nuno Quental & Júlia M. Lourenço, 2012. "References, authors, journals and scientific disciplines underlying the sustainable development literature: a citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 361-381, February.
    20. Jam Shahzaib Khan & Rozana Zakaria & Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin & Nur Izie Adiana Abidin & Shaza Rina Sahamir & Darul Nafis Abbas & Eeydzah Aminudin, 2019. "Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    21. Jiyoung Park & Jungwon Yoon & Kwang-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Critical Review of the Material Criteria of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-24, January.
    22. Wu, Peng & Song, Yongze & Shou, Wenchi & Chi, Hunglin & Chong, Heap-Yih & Sutrisna, Monty, 2017. "A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 370-379.
    23. Nguyen, Hong-Trang & Skitmore, Martin & Gray, Matthew & Zhang, Xiaoling & Olanipekun, Ayokunle Olubunmi, 2017. "Will green building development take off? An exploratory study of barriers to green building in Vietnam," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 8-20.
    24. Maryam Khoshbakht & Zhonghua Gou & Xiaohuan Xie & Baojie He & Amos Darko, 2018. "Green Building Occupant Satisfaction: Evidence from the Australian Higher Education Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    25. Mohamad Bohari, Asmah Alia & Skitmore, Martin & Xia, Bo & Teo, Melissa & Zhang, Xiaoling & Adham, Khairul Naim, 2015. "The path towards greening the Malaysian construction industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1742-1748.
    26. Anand, Chirjiv Kaur & Amor, Ben, 2017. "Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 408-416.
    27. Susie Ruqun Wu & Peilei Fan & Jiquan Chen, 2016. "Incorporating Culture Into Sustainable Development: A Cultural Sustainability Index Framework for Green Buildings," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 64-76, January.
    28. Jennifer H. Allen & Thomas Potiowsky, 2008. "Portland's Green Building Cluster," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 22(4), pages 303-315, November.
    29. Hugh Byrd & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, 2016. "The Productivity Paradox in Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bassem Jamoussi & Asad Abu-Rizaiza & Ali AL-Haij, 2022. "Sustainable Building Standards, Codes and Certification Systems: The Status Quo and Future Directions in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Tatjana Kosić & Slavica Stamatović Vučković & Kosara Kujundžić, 2023. "A Platform of Critical Barriers to Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ge & Li, Yang & Zuo, Jian & Hu, Wenbo & Nie, Qingwei & Lei, Heqian, 2021. "Who drives green innovations? Characteristics and policy implications for green building collaborative innovation networks in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Umberto Berardi, 2013. "Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1573-1591, December.
    3. Anh-Duc Pham & Quang Trung Nguyen & Duc Long Luong & Quynh Chau Truong, 2020. "The Development of a Decision Support Model for Eco-Friendly Material Selection in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Nur Fatin Syazwani Abu Bakar* & Syuhaida Ismail & Rohayah Che Amat & Serdar Durdyev, 2018. "Sustainable Construction in Malaysian Mixed Development Projects: The Barriers and Critical Success Factors," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 885-892:6.
    5. Svetlana Pushkar, 2018. "The Effect of Regional Priority Points on the Performance of LEED 2009 Certified Buildings in Turkey, Spain, and Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Xiaodong Yang & Jiayu Zhang & Xianbo Zhao, 2018. "Factors Affecting Green Residential Building Development: Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Oriol Pons-Valladares & Jelena Nikolic, 2020. "Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Rashidi, Hamidreza & GhaffarianHoseini, Ali & GhaffarianHoseini, Amirhosein & Nik Sulaiman, Nik Meriam & Tookey, John & Hashim, Nur Awanis, 2015. "Application of wastewater treatment in sustainable design of green built environments: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 845-856.
    9. Kim, Rakhyun & Tae, Sungho & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Development of low carbon durability design for green apartment buildings in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 263-272.
    10. Ru Ji & Shilin Qu, 2019. "Investigation and Evaluation of Energy Consumption Performance for Hospital Buildings in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Berardi, Umberto & GhaffarianHoseini, AmirHosein & GhaffarianHoseini, Ali, 2014. "State-of-the-art analysis of the environmental benefits of green roofs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-428.
    12. Berardi, Umberto, 2017. "A cross-country comparison of the building energy consumptions and their trends," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 230-241.
    13. Jiangang Shi & Kaifeng Duan & Guangdong Wu & Hongyun Si & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Sustainability at the community level: A bibliometric journey around a set of sustainability‐related terms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 256-274, February.
    14. Berardi, Umberto, 2013. "Stakeholders’ influence on the adoption of energy-saving technologies in Italian homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 520-530.
    15. Lavinia Chiara Tagliabue & Fulvio Re Cecconi & Sebastiano Maltese & Stefano Rinaldi & Angelo Luigi Camillo Ciribini & Alessandra Flammini, 2021. "Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Genbao Liu & Tengfei Zhao & Hong Yan & Han Wu & Fuming Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Green Building Design Schemes to Achieve Sustainability Based on the Projection Pursuit Model Optimized by the Atomic Orbital Search," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Chen-Yi Sun & Yin-Guang Chen & Rong-Jing Wang & Shih-Chi Lo & Jyh-Tyng Yau & Ya-Wen Wu, 2019. "Construction Cost of Green Building Certified Residence: A Case Study in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, April.
    18. Goune Kang & Hunhee Cho & Dongyoun Lee, 2019. "Dynamic Lifecycle Assessment in Building Construction Projects: Focusing on Embodied Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Francesco Barreca & Giuseppe Davide Cardinali, 2019. "ITACAFood: A Model to Certificate the Sustainability of Food Processing Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Mateusz Kozicki & Michał Piasecki & Anna Goljan & Halina Deptuła & Adam Niesłochowski, 2018. "Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Dispersion and Cementitious Waterproofing Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12909-:d:684845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.