IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p3902-d178613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Approach of Including TVOCs Concentration in the Indoor Environmental Quality Model (IEQ)—Case Studies of BREEAM Certified Office Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Piasecki

    (Departament of Thermal Physic, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Mateusz Kozicki

    (Departament of Thermal Physic, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Szymon Firląg

    (The Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-637 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Goljan

    (Departament of Thermal Physic, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Krystyna Kostyrko

    (Departament of Thermal Physic, Acoustic and Environment, Building Research Institute, 00-611 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The article analyzes the impact of measured concentrations of Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOC) emissions determined for four BREEAM certified buildings on the Indoor Air Quality Index (IAQ index ) and the overall Indoor Environment Quality index (IEQ index ). The IEQ index indicates the percentage of building users who are satisfied from the indoor environment. In existing IEQ models, currently the concentration of CO 2 is mostly used to evaluate the IAQ index sub-component. Authors point out that it is recommended to use TVOC instead CO 2 at pre-occupant stage where building is mainly polluted by emission from finishing products. The research provides the approach where the component related to the emission of TVOCs is implemented to IEQ model. The first stage of assessment was a test of the volatile organic compounds concentrations in case study buildings. Secondly, the analysis results were assigned into the number of dissatisfied users (PD( IAQ) ) from the theoretical function given by Jokl-Fanger resulting from the Weber-Fechner equation. Finally, the overall IEQ index was calculated. The IEQ approach proposed in this paper is mainly based on a consideration of EN 15251 and scientifically accepted models.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Piasecki & Mateusz Kozicki & Szymon Firląg & Anna Goljan & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2018. "The Approach of Including TVOCs Concentration in the Indoor Environmental Quality Model (IEQ)—Case Studies of BREEAM Certified Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3902-:d:178613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiyao Chen & Fei Li & Chaoyang Liu & Jun Yang & Jingdong Zhang & Chunlin Peng, 2017. "Monitoring, Human Health Risk Assessment and Optimized Management for Typical Pollutants in Indoor Air from Random Families of University Staff, Wuhan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Mateusz Kozicki & Michał Piasecki & Anna Goljan & Halina Deptuła & Adam Niesłochowski, 2018. "Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Dispersion and Cementitious Waterproofing Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Yanpeng Wu & Yuming Lu & Ding-Chin Chou, 2018. "Indoor air quality investigation of a university library based on field measurement and questionnaire survey," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 148-160.
    4. Yanpeng Wu & Yuming Lu & Ding-Chin Chou, 2018. "Corrigendum: Indoor air quality investigation of a university library based on field measurement and questionnaire survey," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 192-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michał Piasecki & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2020. "Development of Weighting Scheme for Indoor Air Quality Model Using a Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, June.
    2. Michał Piasecki & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Piotr Czerski & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Michał Zielina & Paweł Krzyściak & Patrycja Kwaśniewska-Sip & Wojciech Grześkowiak, 2020. "Implementation of the Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Model for the Assessment of a Retrofitted Historical Masonry Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Anna Devitofrancesco & Lorenzo Belussi & Italo Meroni & Fabio Scamoni, 2019. "Development of an Indoor Environmental Quality Assessment Tool for the Rating of Offices in Real Working Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Chuloh Jung & Nahla Al Qassimi, 2022. "Investigating the Emission of Hazardous Chemical Substances from Mashrabiya Used for Indoor Air Quality in Hot Desert Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Lihua Liang & Baohua Wen & Feng Xu & Jianwei Yan & Xiangqi Yan & S. Ramesh, 2021. "Linking the Development of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools with the Concept Evolution of Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Mateusz Kozicki & Anna Wiejak & Michał Piasecki & Alicja Abram, 2019. "Identification of MVOCs Produced by Coniophora puteana and Poria placenta Growing on WPC Boards by Using Subtraction Mass Spectra," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Michał Piasecki & Krystyna Kostyrko & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Katarzyna Nowak, 2020. "Air Enthalpy as an IAQ Indicator in Hot and Humid Environment—Experimental Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michał Piasecki & Krystyna Kostyrko, 2020. "Development of Weighting Scheme for Indoor Air Quality Model Using a Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, June.
    2. Fei Li & Zhenzhen Qiu & Jingdong Zhang & Chaoyang Liu & Ying Cai & Minsi Xiao, 2017. "Spatial Distribution and Fuzzy Health Risk Assessment of Trace Elements in Surface Water from Honghu Lake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Jolanda Palmisani & Alessia Di Gilio & Ezia Cisternino & Maria Tutino & Gianluigi de Gennaro, 2020. "Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from a Personal Care Polymer-Based Item: Simulation of the Inhalation Exposure Scenario Indoors under Actual Conditions of Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Mateusz Kozicki & Anna Wiejak & Michał Piasecki & Alicja Abram, 2019. "Identification of MVOCs Produced by Coniophora puteana and Poria placenta Growing on WPC Boards by Using Subtraction Mass Spectra," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Rafael Piñeiro & Eva Jimenez-Relinque & Roman Nevshupa & Marta Castellote, 2021. "Primary and Secondary Emissions of VOCs and PAHs in Indoor Air from a Waterproof Coal-Tar Membrane: Diagnosis and Remediation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jonas Šaparauskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2018. "Sustainability in Construction Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.
    7. Rui Zhu & Yang Lv & Zhimeng Wang & Xi Chen, 2021. "Prediction of the Hypertension Risk of the Elderly in Built Environments Based on the LSTM Deep Learning and Bayesian Fitting Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Hongyou Lu & Yunchan Zhu & Yu Qi & Jinliang Yu, 2018. "Do Urban Subway Openings Reduce PM 2.5 Concentrations? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Yao-Tang Hsu & Wen-Hsin Wang & Wei-Hsi Hung, 2020. "Evaluating the Properties of a Coating Material with Polycaprolactone-Degradable Fluorinated Silicon-Containing Waterborne Polyurethane," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3902-:d:178613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.