IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11784-d664268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced Subcontractors Allocation for Apartment Construction Project Applying Conceptual 4D Digital Twin Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Woong-Gi Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, 222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Namhyuk Ham

    (Department of Digital Architecture and Urban Engineering, Hanyang Cyber University, 220, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Jae-Jun Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, 222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

Abstract

The problem of optimal allocation of resources in limited circumstances to handle assigned tasks has been dealt with in a wide variety of research fields. Various research methodologies have been proposed to address uncertainties such as waiting and waste in construction projects, but they do not take into account the complexity of construction production systems. In this study, a research approach was proposed that simplified the construction production system into a work package to be serviced and a work group to provide services. In addition, a conceptual 4D digital twin framework considering the uncertainty of the construction production system was proposed. This framework includes BIM as an information model and a queuing model as a decision-making model. Through case projects, we have presented how this framework can be used for decision making in several statuses. As a result of the analysis using the performance index of the queuing model, it was possible to monitor the status of the system according to the allocation of resources. In addition, it was possible to confirm the improvement of the performance index according to the additional arrangement of the work group and the activity cycle of the work package. The framework presented in this study helps to quantitatively analyze the state of the system according to the input data based on empirical knowledge, but it has a limitation in that it cannot present an optimized resource allocation solution. Therefore, in future research, it is necessary to consider the grafting of machine learning technology that can provide optimal solutions by solving complex decision-making problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Woong-Gi Kim & Namhyuk Ham & Jae-Jun Kim, 2021. "Enhanced Subcontractors Allocation for Apartment Construction Project Applying Conceptual 4D Digital Twin Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11784-:d:664268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11784/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11784/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard O. Koopman, 1972. "Air-Terminal Queues under Time-Dependent Conditions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 1089-1114, December.
    2. Jonathan Gillard & Vincent Knight, 2014. "Using Singular Spectrum Analysis to obtain staffing level requirements in emergency units," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(5), pages 735-746, May.
    3. Partha Chakroborty & Rahul Gill & Pranamesh Chakraborty, 2016. "Analysing queueing at toll plazas using a coupled, multiple-queue, queueing system model: application to toll plaza design," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 675-692, October.
    4. Rafael Sacks & Michael Harel, 2006. "An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behaviour," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 869-881.
    5. Doriana M. D’Addona & A. M. M. Sharif Ullah & D. Matarazzo, 2017. "Tool-wear prediction and pattern-recognition using artificial neural network and DNA-based computing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1285-1301, August.
    6. Peter J. Kolesar & Kenneth L. Rider & Thomas B. Crabill & Warren E. Walker, 1975. "A Queuing-Linear Programming Approach to Scheduling Police Patrol Cars," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1045-1062, December.
    7. Jin-Won Kim & Namhyuk Ham & Jae-Jun Kim, 2021. "Quantitative Analysis of Waiting Length and Waiting Time for Frame Construction Work Activities Using a Queue Model; Focusing on Korean Apartment Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Ingolfsson, Armann & Amanul Haque, Md. & Umnikov, Alex, 2002. "Accounting for time-varying queueing effects in workforce scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 585-597, June.
    9. P. E. D. Love & P. Mandal & H. Li, 1999. "Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 505-517.
    10. Joosung Lee & Jaejun Kim, 2017. "BIM-Based 4D Simulation to Improve Module Manufacturing Productivity for Sustainable Building Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwarz, Justus Arne & Selinka, Gregor & Stolletz, Raik, 2016. "Performance analysis of time-dependent queueing systems: Survey and classification," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 170-189.
    2. Defraeye, Mieke & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke, 2016. "Staffing and scheduling under nonstationary demand for service: A literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 4-25.
    3. Linda V. Green & Peter J. Kolesar, 1998. "A Note on Approximating Peak Congestion in Mt/G/\infty Queues with Sinusoidal Arrivals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-2), pages 137-144, November.
    4. Ingolfsson, Armann & Campello, Fernanda & Wu, Xudong & Cabral, Edgar, 2010. "Combining integer programming and the randomization method to schedule employees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 153-163, April.
    5. Ward Whitt & Wei You, 2019. "Time-Varying Robust Queueing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1766-1782, November.
    6. Stolletz, Raik, 2008. "Approximation of the non-stationary M(t)/M(t)/c(t)-queue using stationary queueing models: The stationary backlog-carryover approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 478-493, October.
    7. Júlíus Atlason & Marina A. Epelman & Shane G. Henderson, 2008. "Optimizing Call Center Staffing Using Simulation and Analytic Center Cutting-Plane Methods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 295-309, February.
    8. Antonio Del Prete & Rodolfo Franchi & Stefania Cacace & Quirico Semeraro, 2020. "Optimization of cutting conditions using an evolutive online procedure," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 481-499, February.
    9. Michael R. Taaffe & Gordon M. Clark, 1988. "Approximating nonstationary two‐priority non‐preemptive queueing systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 125-145, February.
    10. Shone, Rob & Glazebrook, Kevin & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2019. "Resource allocation in congested queueing systems with time-varying demand: An application to airport operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 566-581.
    11. Hosang Hyun & Hyunsoo Kim & Hyun-Soo Lee & Moonseo Park & Jeonghoon Lee, 2020. "Integrated Design Process for Modular Construction Projects to Reduce Rework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    13. Dietz, Dennis C., 2011. "Practical scheduling for call center operations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 550-557, October.
    14. Daniel, Joseph I, 1995. "Congestion Pricing and Capacity of Large Hub Airports: A Bottleneck Model with Stochastic Queues," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 327-370, March.
    15. Amir Rastpour & Armann Ingolfsson & Bora Kolfal, 2020. "Modeling Yellow and Red Alert Durations for Ambulance Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(8), pages 1972-1991, August.
    16. Ramin Ansari & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Roohollah Taherkhani & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Darius Migilinskas & Shohreh Moradi, 2022. "Performance Prediction of Construction Projects Based on the Causes of Claims: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Yehiel Rosenfeld, 2009. "Cost of quality versus cost of non-quality in construction: the crucial balance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 107-117.
    18. Shi Chen & Hau Lee, 2017. "Incentive Alignment and Coordination of Project Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1011-1025, April.
    19. Talebiyan, Hesam & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo, 2023. "Auctions for resource allocation and decentralized restoration of interdependent networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Tasos Nikoleris & Mark Hansen, 2012. "Queueing Models for Trajectory-Based Aircraft Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 501-511, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11784-:d:664268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.