IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i3p426-d92928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BIM-Based 4D Simulation to Improve Module Manufacturing Productivity for Sustainable Building Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Joosung Lee

    () (Department of Architectural Engineering, Graduate School, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimri-ro, Seongdonggu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Jaejun Kim

    () (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimri-ro, Seongdonggu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

Abstract

Modular construction methods, where products are manufactured beforehand in a factory and then transported to the site for installation, are becoming increasingly popular for construction projects in many countries as this method facilitates the use of the advanced technologies that support sustainability in building projects. This approach requires dual factory–site process management to be carefully coordinated and the factory module manufacturing process must therefore be managed in a detailed and quantitative manner. However, currently, the limited algorithms available to support this process are based on mathematical methodologies that do not consider the complex mix of equipment, factories, personnel, and materials involved. This paper presents three new building information modeling-based 4D simulation frameworks to manage the three elements—process, quantity, and quality—that determine the productivity of factory module manufacturing. These frameworks leverage the advantages of 4D simulation and provide more precise information than existing conventional documents. By utilizing a 4D model that facilitates the visualization of a wide range of data variables, manufacturers can plan the module manufacturing process in detail and fully understand the material, equipment, and workflow needed to accomplish the manufacturing tasks. Managers can also access information about material quantities for each process and use this information for earned value management, warehousing/storage, fabrication, and assembly planning. By having a 4D view that connects 2D drawing models, manufacturing errors and rework can be minimized and problems such as construction delays, quality lapses, and cost overruns vastly reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Joosung Lee & Jaejun Kim, 2017. "BIM-Based 4D Simulation to Improve Module Manufacturing Productivity for Sustainable Building Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:426-:d:92928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/426/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/426/
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oguz, Osman & Bala, Hasan, 1994. "A comparative study of computational procedures for the resource constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 406-416, January.
    2. Boctor, Fayer F., 1990. "Some efficient multi-heuristic procedures for resource-constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 3-13, November.
    3. Wiley, Victor D. & Deckro, Richard F. & Jackson, Jack A., 1998. "Optimization analysis for design and planning of multi-project programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 492-506, June.
    4. Lawrence, Stephen R. & Morton, Thomas E., 1993. "Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling with tardy costs: Comparing myopic, bottleneck, and resource pricing heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 168-187, January.
    5. Vercellis, Carlo, 1994. "Constrained multi-project plannings problems: A Lagrangean decomposition approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 267-275, October.
    6. Gul Polat & David Arditi & Glenn Ballard & Ugur Mungen, 2006. "Economics of on-site vs. off-site fabrication of rebar," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1185-1198.
    7. Mohanty, R. P. & Siddiq, M. K., 1989. "Multiple projects -- Multiple resources constrained scheduling: A multiobjective analysis," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 83-92, October.
    8. Deckro, Richard F. & Winkofsky, E. P. & E. Hebert, John & Gagnon, Roger, 1991. "A decomposition approach to multi-project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 110-118, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:908-:d:137373 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Building information modeling; 4D simulation; sustainability; operation level 4D model; modular construction; schedule management; material quantity management; quality management;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics
    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:426-:d:92928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team). General contact details of provider: http://www.mdpi.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.