IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11628-d661438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion on the Feasibility of the Integration of Wind Power and Coal Chemical Industries for Hydrogen Production

Author

Listed:
  • Shuxia Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shengjiang Peng

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    State Grid Gansu Electric Power Company Power Grid Constructi Division (Construction Branch), Lanzhou 730030, China)

  • Xianzhang Ling

    (School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

Abstract

To improve the utilization rate of the energy industry and reduce high energy consumption and pollution caused by coal chemical industries in northwestern China, a planning scheme of a wind-coal coupling energy system was developed. This scheme involved the analysis method, evaluation criteria, planning method, and optimization operation check for the integration of a comprehensive evaluation framework. A system was established to plan the total cycle revenue to maximize the net present value of the goal programming model and overcome challenges associated with the development of new forms of energy. Subsequently, the proposed scheme is demonstrated using a 500-MW wind farm. The annual capacity of a coal-to-methanol system is 50,000. Results show that the reliability of the wind farm capacity and the investment subject are the main factors affecting the feasibility of the wind-coal coupled system. Wind power hydrogen production generates O 2 and H 2 , which are used for methanol preparation and electricity production in coal chemical systems, respectively. Considering electricity price constraints and environmental benefits, a methanol production plant can construct its own wind farm, matching its output to facilitate a more economical wind-coal coupled system. Owing to the high investment cost of wind power plants, an incentive mechanism for saving energy and reducing emissions should be provided for the wind-coal coupled system to ensure economic feasibility and promote clean energy transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuxia Yang & Shengjiang Peng & Xianzhang Ling, 2021. "Discussion on the Feasibility of the Integration of Wind Power and Coal Chemical Industries for Hydrogen Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11628-:d:661438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Bohong & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Liang, Yongtu & Yuan, Meng & Zhang, Haoran & Liu, Jiayi, 2020. "Implementing hydrogen injection in coal-dominated regions: Supply chain optimisation and reliability analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Valdés, R. & Lucio, J.H. & Rodríguez, L.R., 2013. "Operational simulation of wind power plants for electrolytic hydrogen production connected to a distributed electricity generation grid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 249-257.
    3. Anan Zhang & Hong Zhang & Meysam Qadrdan & Wei Yang & Xiaolong Jin & Jianzhong Wu, 2019. "Optimal Planning of Integrated Energy Systems for Offshore Oil Extraction and Processing Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Buyuan & Tao, Yao & Li, Xinying & Chu, Han & Liu, Fangtong, 2019. "Sustainability performance assessment of wind power coupling hydrogen storage projects using a hybrid evaluation technique based on interval type-2 fuzzy set," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1176-1190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    2. Platero, C.A. & Nicolet, C. & Sánchez, J.A. & Kawkabani, B., 2014. "Increasing wind power penetration in autonomous power systems through no-flow operation of Pelton turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 515-523.
    3. Qolipour, Mojtaba & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Tousi, Omid Mohseni, 2017. "Techno-economic feasibility of a photovoltaic-wind power plant construction for electric and hydrogen production: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 113-123.
    4. Hoseinzadeh, Siamak & Astiaso Garcia, Davide & Huang, Lizhen, 2023. "Grid-connected renewable energy systems flexibility in Norway islands’ Decarbonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Wang, Guotao & Liao, Qi & Wang, Chang & Liang, Yongtu & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Multiperiod optimal planning of biofuel refueling stations: A bi-level game-theoretic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1152-1165.
    6. Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Xu, Chuanbo & Wu, Yunna & Dai, Shuyu, 2020. "What are the critical barriers to the development of hydrogen refueling stations in China? A modified fuzzy DEMATEL approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    8. Roman Vavrek & Jana Chovancová, 2020. "Energy Performance of the European Union Countries in Terms of Reaching the European Energy Union Objectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Yang, Shi-guan & Zhou, Jia-le & Hu, Zhuang & Zhou, Xin-yue & Cai, Qi & Xie, Jin-heng & Wu, Yang-wen & Lu, Qiang, 2023. "Site selection decision framework for biomass pyrolysis project based on a mixed method under probabilistic linguistic environment and low carbon perspective: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Tian, Xiaoge & Chen, Weiming & Hu, Jinglu, 2023. "Game-theoretic modeling of power supply chain coordination under demand variation in China: A case study of Guangdong Province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    11. Kiracı, Kasım & Akan, Ercan, 2020. "Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Wu, Yunna & Liu, Fangtong & Wu, Junhao & He, Jiaming & Xu, Minjia & Zhou, Jianli, 2022. "Barrier identification and analysis framework to the development of offshore wind-to-hydrogen projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    13. Xu, Yifan & Ji, Mengmeng & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Tao, Hengcong & Zhu, Baikang & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Yuan, Meng & Wang, Bohong, 2023. "Optimal renewable energy export strategies of islands: Hydrogen or electricity?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. Zhao, Chengxuan & Yang, Xiao & Yu, Jie & Yang, Minghan & Wang, Jianye & Chen, Shuai, 2023. "Interval type-2 fuzzy logic control for a space nuclear reactor core power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Zhang, Lihui & Zhao, Zhenli & Yang, Meng & Li, Songrui, 2020. "A multi-criteria decision method for performance evaluation of public charging service quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    16. Qin, Guangyu & Zhang, Meijuan & Yan, Qingyou & Xu, Chuanbo & Kammen, Daniel M., 2021. "Comprehensive evaluation of regional energy internet using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on cloud model: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    17. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Zhendong & Li, Lingfei & Ji, Pengli & Zhou, Qing & Zhang, Zhongliang, 2021. "Sustainable development evaluation on wind power compressed air energy storage projects based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1189.
    18. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar, 2020. "Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy COPRAS based multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    19. Seferlis, Panos & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Chin, Hon Huin & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2021. "Sustainable design, integration, and operation for energy high-performance process systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    20. Zhao, Tian & Liu, Zhixin & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2022. "Developing hydrogen refueling stations: An evolutionary game approach and the case of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11628-:d:661438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.