IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9567-d621698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Inclusive Digital Financial Services Impact User Behavior: A Case of Proximity Mobile Payment in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hong-Lei Mu

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Young-Chan Lee

    (Department of Business Administration, College of Management and Economics, Dongguk University, Gyeongju 38066, Korea)

Abstract

Users’ payment behaviors have changed. The diffusion of mobile devices makes people suitable for proximity mobile payment (PMP) services without traditional payment. Existing mobile payment literature mainly focuses on the adoption and continuous usage behavior. Nevertheless, switching behavior on payment has received little attention, especially on why people switch from traditional payment to PMP. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate factors influencing users’ traditional payment–PMP switching to comprehend how these factors shape switching intention. To that end, we developed a traditional payment–PMP transition model based on the push–pull–mooring framework derived from migration theory. This study conducted a structural equation modeling analysis on 311 valid data. The findings indicated that a push factor drives users away from traditional payment in terms of dissatisfaction. The pull factors, including perceived substitutability and perceived usefulness, attract users to PMP. Furthermore, a positive mooring factor facilitates users’ switching intention to PMP in terms of perceived technical compatibility. The negative mooring factor, in terms of perceived risk, hinders users’ switching intention. However, another pull factor—perceived ease of use—failed to influence switching intention significantly. This study found some distinctions between mobile payment switching and mobile payment adoption. These findings provide pivotal insights for mobile payment service providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong-Lei Mu & Young-Chan Lee, 2021. "How Inclusive Digital Financial Services Impact User Behavior: A Case of Proximity Mobile Payment in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9567-:d:621698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Everett Lee, 1966. "A theory of migration," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 3(1), pages 47-57, March.
    3. Madhavan Parthasarathy & Anol Bhattacherjee, 1998. "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 362-379, December.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Chen Ye & DongBack Seo & Kevin C. Desouza & Sridhar Papagari Sangareddy & Sanjeev Jha, 2008. "Influences of IT substitutes and user experience on post‐adoption user switching: An empirical investigation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(13), pages 2115-2132, November.
    6. Kuo-Jui Wu & Ching-Jong Liao & Ming-Lang Tseng & Pei-Jay Chou, 2015. "Understanding Innovation for Sustainable Business Management Capabilities and Competencies under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-35, October.
    7. de Luna, Iviane Ramos & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan & Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco, 2019. "Mobile payment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 931-944.
    8. Lai, Jung-Yu & Wang, Juite, 2015. "Switching attitudes of Taiwanese middle-aged and elderly patients toward cloud healthcare services: An exploratory study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 155-167.
    9. Nicole Koenig-Lewis & Morgan Marquet & Adrian Palmer & Anita Lifen Zhao, 2015. "Enjoyment and social influence: predicting mobile payment adoption," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 537-554, July.
    10. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianyang Huang & Gang Wang & Chiwu Huang, 2024. "What promotes the mobile payment behavior of the elderly?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Min, Connie Low & Senali, Madugoda Gunaratnege & Nikbin, Davoud & Foroughi, Behzad, 2022. "Determinants of switching intention from web-based stores to retail apps: Habit as a moderator," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Zaki Irfan Al Hafizh & Anas Hidayat, 2022. "The role of digital payment benefits toward switching consumer behavior in the case of OVO application," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(7), pages 23-34, October.
    4. Qingyu Zhang & Salman Khan & Mei Cao & Safeer Ullah Khan, 2023. "Factors Determining Consumer Acceptance of NFC Mobile Payment: An Extended Mobile Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsieh, Pi-Jung, 2021. "Understanding medical consumers’ intentions to switch from cash payment to medical mobile payment: A perspective of technology migration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Dzandu, Michael D. & Hanu, Charles & Amegbe, Hayford, 2022. "Gamification of mobile money payment for generating customer value in emerging economies: The social impact theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    4. Guych Nuryyev & Yu-Ping Wang & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Bih-Shiaw Jaw & Yi-Shien Yeh & Hsien-Tang Lin & Li-Fan Wu, 2020. "Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Swapan Kumar Saha & Guijun Zhuang & Sihan Li, 2020. "Will Consumers Pay More for Efficient Delivery? An Empirical Study of What Affects E-Customers’ Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay on Online Shopping in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Hsu, Chin-Lung & Lu, Hsi-Peng & Hsu, Huei-Hsia, 2007. "Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 715-726, December.
    7. Ameen, Nisreen & Shah, Mahmood Hussain & Sims, Julian & Choudrie, Jyoti & Willis, Robert, 2020. "Are there peas in a pod when considering mobile phone and mobile applications use: A quantitative study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    8. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Zeng, Zhongping & Li, Siqi & Lian, Jiunn-Woei & Li, Jiang & Chen, Tao & Li, Yujia, 2021. "Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: A perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    11. Marzieh Zendehdel & Laily Hj Paim & Syuhaily Bint Osman, 2015. "Students’ online purchasing behavior in Malaysia: Understanding online shopping attitude," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1078428-107, December.
    12. Edgardo R. Bravo, 2015. "Determinantes del desempeño adaptativo en el contexto de sistemas de información," Working Papers 15-18, Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico.
    13. Daragmeh, Ahmad & Lentner, Csaba & Sági, Judit, 2021. "FinTech payments in the era of COVID-19: Factors influencing behavioral intentions of “Generation X” in Hungary to use mobile payment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    14. Abdolrazagh Madahi & Inda Sukati, 2016. "An Empirical Study of Malaysian Consumers’ Channel-switching Intention: Using theory of Planned Behaviour," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3), pages 489-523, June.
    15. Carol Pollard, 2003. "Exploring Continued and Discontinued Use of IT: A Case Study of OptionFinder, a Group Support System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 171-193, May.
    16. Schmidthuber, Lisa & Maresch, Daniela & Ginner, Michael, 2020. "Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector - toward a refined technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Tzu-Hsin Chu & Cheng-Min Chao & Hsieh-Hsi Liu & Der-Fa Chen, 2022. "Developing an Extended Theory of UTAUT 2 Model to Explore Factors Influencing Taiwanese Consumer Adoption of Intelligent Elevators," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    18. Ying-Wei Wu & Ting-Hsiu Liao & Shang-Pao Yeh & Hao-Chen Huang, 2022. "Switching Intention and Behaviors to Wetland Ecotourism after the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Perspective of Push-Pull-Mooring Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Raja Sankaran & Shibashish Chakraborty, 2021. "Factors Impacting Mobile Banking in India: Empirical Approach Extending UTAUT2 with Perceived Value and Trust," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 7-24, January.
    20. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2013. "Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1317-1337, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9567-:d:621698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.