IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9527-d620857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison into the Factors Affecting Urban Rail Systems: Local, Express, and High-Speed Rail in Tunnels at a Great Depth in a Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Kyujin Lee

    (Sustainable Urban Transportation Research Center, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea)

  • Woojin Kim

    (Department of Urban and Transportation Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea)

  • Junghan Baek

    (National Infrastructure Research Division, Korea Research Institute of Human Settlement (KRIHS), Sejong 30147, Korea)

  • Junghwa Kim

    (Department of Urban and Transportation Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea)

Abstract

In this study, the factors influencing the choice of the type of urban railroad transportation in the metropolitan areas of Korea were analyzed. As the populations of metropolitan areas are expanding, the importance of rail transportation, which has a high travel reliability in terms of travel time, has increased, and various types of railroad systems have emerged accordingly. This study was focused on the choice behavior of travelers on local and express trains that use the same track and differ only in the number of stations and operating times. To compare the choice behavior of travelers between local and express trains, factors such as the waiting time on the platform and the in-car travel time were considered. We also investigated the system choice behavior for an existing express subway and high-speed rail trains in tunnels at a great depth in terms of horizontal access time (walking), vertical access time, in-vehicle travel time, and travel fare. For a high-speed rail built underground at a great depth of 50 m, the stated preference survey was designed, and data were collected in consideration of the Great Train Express being promoted in the Seoul metropolitan area by the Korean government. The results of this study are expected to be considered important data for improving the rail system design from the user’s perspective to increase the demand for urban rail transportation in metropolitan areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyujin Lee & Woojin Kim & Junghan Baek & Junghwa Kim, 2021. "A Comparison into the Factors Affecting Urban Rail Systems: Local, Express, and High-Speed Rail in Tunnels at a Great Depth in a Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9527-:d:620857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiess, Heinz & Florian, Michael, 1989. "Optimal strategies: A new assignment model for transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 83-102, April.
    2. Junghan Baek & Keemin Sohn, 2016. "An investigation into passenger preference for express trains during peak hours," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 623-641, July.
    3. Goran Arnoldsson, 2003. "Optimal designs for beta-binomial logistic regression models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 939-951.
    4. van Loon, Ruben & Rietveld, Piet & Brons, Martijn, 2011. "Travel-time reliability impacts on railway passenger demand: a revealed preference analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 917-925.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuchen Qin & Yikang Zhang & Minfeng Yao & Qiwei Chen, 2023. "How to Measure the Impact of Walking Accessibility of Suburban Rail Station Catchment Areas on the Commercial Premium Benefits of Joint Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J. & Anderson, Richard J., 2017. "Crowding cost estimation with large scale smart card and vehicle location data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 105-125.
    2. Tong, C.O. & Wong, S.C., 1998. "A stochastic transit assignment model using a dynamic schedule-based network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 107-121, April.
    3. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Ding Luo & Oded Cats & Hans Lint, 2020. "Can passenger flow distribution be estimated solely based on network properties in public transport systems?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 2757-2776, December.
    5. E. Codina & A. Marín & F. López, 2013. "A model for setting services on auxiliary bus lines under congestion," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(1), pages 48-83, April.
    6. Preston, John, 2008. "Competition in transit markets," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 75-84, January.
    7. Younes Hamdouch & Siriphong Lawphongpanich, 2010. "Congestion Pricing for Schedule-Based Transit Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 350-366, August.
    8. Miller-Hooks, Elise & Mahmassani, Hani, 2003. "Path comparisons for a priori and time-adaptive decisions in stochastic, time-varying networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 67-82, April.
    9. Nair, Rahul & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Equilibrium network design of shared-vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 47-61.
    10. Taiba Zahid & Fouzia Gillani & Usman Ghafoor & Muhammad Raheel Bhutta, 2022. "Synchromodal Transportation Analysis of the One-Belt-One-Road Initiative Based on a Bi-Objective Mathematical Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. David Canca & Belén Navarro-Carmona & Gabriel Villa & Alejandro Zarzo, 2023. "A Multilayer Network Approach for the Bimodal Bus–Pedestrian Line Planning Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-36, October.
    12. Wang, David Z.W. & Nayan, Ashish & Szeto, W.Y., 2018. "Optimal bus service design with limited stop services in a travel corridor," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 70-86.
    13. Roberto Cominetti & José Correa, 2001. "Common-Lines and Passenger Assignment in Congested Transit Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 250-267, August.
    14. Ahmad Tavassoli & Mahmoud Mesbah & Mark Hickman, 2018. "Application of smart card data in validating a large-scale multi-modal transit assignment model," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, May.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0197181 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Bing-Zheng Liu & Ying-En Ge & Kai Cao & Xi Jiang & Lingyun Meng & Ding Liu & Yunfeng Gao, 2017. "Optimizing a desirable fare structure for a bus-subway corridor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2022. "Frequency-based path flow estimator for transit origin-destination trip matrices incorporating automatic passenger count and automatic fare collection data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Jiang, Chenming & Bhat, Chandra R. & Lam, William H.K., 2020. "A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 268-291.
    19. Sang Nguyen & Stefano Pallottino & Federico Malucelli, 2001. "A Modeling Framework for Passenger Assignment on a Transport Network with Timetables," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 238-249, August.
    20. Jonas Hatzenbühler & Oded Cats & Erik Jenelius, 2022. "Network design for line-based autonomous bus services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 467-502, April.
    21. Ouassim Manout & Patrick Bonnel & François Pacull, 2020. "The impact of centroid connectors on transit assignment outcomes," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 611-629, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9527-:d:620857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.