IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8926-d611414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A GIS-CA Model for Planning Bikeways upon the Footpath Network

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Zhao

    (Beijing Transport Institute, Beijing 100073, China)

  • Jie Zhang

    (Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK)

  • Ning Zhang

    (National Research Center for Rehabilitation Technical Aids, Beijing 100176, China)

  • Yiik Diew Wong

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Yufang Zhou

    (Beijing Transport Institute, Beijing 100073, China)

  • Meng Meng

    (School of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK)

Abstract

This study proposes a geographic information system (GIS)-based cellular automata (CA) model, which is designed for planning bikeways upon existing footpath networks within an urban area. The CA model was developed based on a GIS platform as a visual interface whereby spatiotemporal characteristics and spatial processing can be combined in a highly effective way. The host value of each CA cell is conditioned upon four indicator variables, namely cycling demand level, land-use nature, social value, and traffic safety. This model gives traffic planners a quick and intuitive framework to develop cycling facilities under limited land resources. A model prototype has been developed in a common desktop GIS and applied to a mid-sized rapidly developing area in Singapore.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Zhao & Jie Zhang & Ning Zhang & Yiik Diew Wong & Yufang Zhou & Meng Meng, 2021. "A GIS-CA Model for Planning Bikeways upon the Footpath Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8926-:d:611414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Jie & Meng, Meng & Wong, Yiik Diew & Ieromonachou, Petros & Wang, David Z.W., 2021. "A data-driven dynamic repositioning model in bicycle-sharing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Susan Hull Grasso & Philip Barnes & Celeste Chavis, 2020. "Bike Share Equity for Underrepresented Groups: Analyzing Barriers to System Usage in Baltimore, Maryland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Milakis, Dimitris & Athanasopoulos, Konstantinos, 2014. "What about people in cycle network planning? applying participative multicriteria GIS analysis in the case of the Athens metropolitan cycle network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 120-129.
    4. Rodrigo Mora & Pablo Moran, 2020. "Public Bike Sharing Programs Under the Prism of Urban Planning Officials: The Case of Santiago de Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale, 2021. "Toward Sustainability: Bike-Sharing Systems Design, Simulation and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-5, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suhaib Alshayeb & Aleksandar Stevanovic & Nemanja Dobrota, 2021. "Impact of Various Operating Conditions on Simulated Emissions-Based Stop Penalty at Signalized Intersections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-30, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Latournerie, André & Tirachini, Alejandro & Quitral, Félix, 2022. "Optimal pricing and design of station-based bike-sharing systems: A microeconomic model," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    2. Cai, Yanpeng & Applegate, Scott & Yue, Wencong & Cai, Jianying & Wang, Xuan & Liu, Gengyuan & Li, Chunhui, 2017. "A hybrid life cycle and multi-criteria decision analysis approach for identifying sustainable development strategies of Beijing's taxi fleet," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 314-325.
    3. Liu, Yixiao & Tian, Zihao & Pan, Baoran & Zhang, Wenbin & Liu, Yunqi & Tian, Lixin, 2022. "A hybrid big-data-based and tolerance-based method to estimate environmental benefits of electric bike sharing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    4. Esther Fasan & Miles Tight & Harry Evdorides, 2021. "Factors Influencing Cycling among Secondary School Adolescents in an Ethnically Diverse City: The Perspective of Birmingham Transport Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Senes, Giulio & Rovelli, Roberto & Bertoni, Danilo & Arata, Laura & Fumagalli, Natalia & Toccolini, Alessandro, 2017. "Factors influencing greenways use: Definition of a method for estimation in the Italian context," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 175-187.
    6. Müller, Sven & Mejia-Dorantes, Lucia & Kersten, Elisa, 2020. "Analysis of active school transportation in hilly urban environments: A case study of Dresden," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Burke, Charles M. & Scott, Darren M., 2016. "The space race: A framework to evaluate the potential travel-time impacts of reallocating road space to bicycle facilities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 110-119.
    8. Franceschini, Simone & Marletto, Gerardo, 2015. "Assessing the benefits and the shortcomings of participation – findings from a test in Bari (Italy)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 33-42.
    9. Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio & Fuenzalida-Izquierdo, Jorge & Sagaris, Lake & Mora, Rodrigo, 2021. "Using the five Ws to explore bikeshare equity in Santiago, Chile," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Karol Żarski, 2021. "Bicycle Traffic Model for Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-36, September.
    11. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. & Handy, Susan L., 2023. "Does bike-share enhance transport equity? Evidence from the Sacramento, California region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Paraskevi Karanikola & Thomas Panagopoulos & Stilianos Tampakis & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2018. "Cycling as a Smart and Green Mode of Transport in Small Touristic Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Ugo N. Castañon & Paulo J. G. Ribeiro, 2021. "Bikeability and Emerging Phenomena in Cycling: Exploratory Analysis and Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Oviedo, Daniel & Sabogal-Cardona, Orlando, 2022. "Arguments for cycling as a mechanism for sustainable modal shifts in Bogotá," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Kiani Mavi, Reza & Zarbakhshnia, Navid & Khazraei, Armin, 2018. "Bus rapid transit (BRT): A simulation and multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 187-197.
    16. Johanna Camargo Pérez & Martha Carrillo & Jairo Montoya-Torres, 2015. "Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 69-87, March.
    17. Efthimios Bakogiannis & Thanos Vlastos & Konstantinos Athanasopoulos & Avgi Vassi & Georgia Christodoulopoulou & Christos Karolemeas & Stefanos Tsigdinos & Charalampos Kyriakidis & Maria-Stella Noutso, 2020. "Exploring Motivators and Deterrents of Cycling Tourism Using Qualitative Social Research Methods and Participative Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Wang, Haizhong & Palm, Matthew & Chen, Chen & Vogt, Rachel & Wang, Yiyi, 2016. "Does bicycle network level of traffic stress (LTS) explain bicycle travel behavior? Mixed results from an Oregon case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 8-18.
    19. Marquart, Heike & Schlink, Uwe & Ueberham, Maximilian, 2020. "The planned and the perceived city: A comparison of cyclists' and decision-makers' views on cycling quality," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Jonas Schmid-Querg & Andreas Keler & Georgios Grigoropoulos, 2021. "The Munich Bikeability Index: A Practical Approach for Measuring Urban Bikeability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8926-:d:611414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.