IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5425-d553325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Emergence Herbicides for Effective Weed Management, Enhanced Wheat Productivity, Profitability and Quality in North-Western Himalayas: A ‘Participatory-Mode’ Technology Development and Dissemination

Author

Listed:
  • Anil K. Choudhary

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India
    Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla 171001, India
    Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • D.S. Yadav

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India)

  • Pankaj Sood

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India)

  • Shakuntla Rahi

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India)

  • Kalpana Arya

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India)

  • S.K. Thakur

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India
    Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Kukumseri 175142, Lahaul & Spiti, India)

  • Ramesh Lal

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Kukumseri 175142, Lahaul & Spiti, India
    Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Bajaura 175125, Kullu, India)

  • Subhash Kumar

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India
    Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Bajaura 175125, Kullu, India)

  • Jagdev Sharma

    (Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla 171001, India)

  • Anchal Dass

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Subhash Babu

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • R.S. Bana

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • D.S. Rana

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
    School of Agricultural Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Adarsh Kumar

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
    National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, Mau 275109, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Sudhir K. Rajpoot

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
    Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Gaurendra Gupta

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
    Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Anil Kumar

    (Farm Science Centre, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Sundernagar 175019, India
    Farm Science Centre, GAD Veterinary & Animal Science University, Tarn Taran 143412, Punjab, India)

  • Harish M.N.

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • A.U. Noorzai

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India
    Department of Agronomy, Afghanistan National Agricultural Sciences & Technology University, Kandahar 3802, Afghanistan
    Faculty of Agriculture, Sayed Jamaluddin Afghani University, Asadabad 2801, Kunar, Afghanistan)

  • G.A. Rajanna

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

  • Mohammad Halim Khan

    (Attara PG College, Bundelkhand University, Atarra 210201, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • V.K. Dua

    (Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla 171001, India)

  • Raj Singh

    (Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)

Abstract

‘Participatory-mode’ adaptive research was conducted in wheat in north-western Himalayas (NWH) during 2008–2014 to develop an improved chemical weed management (ICWM) technology. First of all, two years ‘on-farm experimentation’ was performed in a randomized block design at 10 locations in NWH using seven treatments (Clodinafop @ 60 g a.i./ha (Clod); Clod followed by 2,4-D (Na-salt) @ 1.0 kg a.i./ha (Clod-fb-D); Isoproturon 75 WP @ 1.0 kg a.i./ha (Iso); Iso + D; Sulfosulfuron 75% WG @ 25 g a.i./ha + Metsulfuron 5% WG @ 2 g a.i./ha (Sulf + Met); weed-free-check; and un-weeded-check). In this study, the post-emergence application of Sulf + Met reported the lowest weed-index and NPK depletion by weeds with higher weed control efficiency (86.4%), weed control index (81.1%) and herbicide efficiency index (2.62) over other herbicides. Sulf + Met exhibited significantly higher wheat productivity (3.57 t/ha), protein yield, net-returns and water-productivity, which was followed by Iso + D and Clod-fb-D, all of which remained statistically at par with each other. An impact assessment of intensive technology-transfer programme (2008–2014) revealed a higher technology adoption rate (71–98%) of ICWM leading to higher wheat productivity (~22%) and net income gains (2.8–26.4%) in NWH. Overall, Sulf + Met proved highly effective against mixed weed flora in wheat to boost wheat productivity, profitability, quality and water productivity in addition to a higher technology adoption rate and NIGs to transform rural livelihoods in NWH.

Suggested Citation

  • Anil K. Choudhary & D.S. Yadav & Pankaj Sood & Shakuntla Rahi & Kalpana Arya & S.K. Thakur & Ramesh Lal & Subhash Kumar & Jagdev Sharma & Anchal Dass & Subhash Babu & R.S. Bana & D.S. Rana & Adarsh Ku, 2021. "Post-Emergence Herbicides for Effective Weed Management, Enhanced Wheat Productivity, Profitability and Quality in North-Western Himalayas: A ‘Participatory-Mode’ Technology Development and Disseminat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5425-:d:553325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biggs, Stephen & Smith, Grant, 1998. "Beyond methodologies: Coalition-building for participatory technology development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 239-248, February.
    2. Igbadun, Henry E. & Mahoo, Henry F. & Tarimo, Andrew K.P.R. & Salim, Baanda A., 2006. "Crop water productivity of an irrigated maize crop in Mkoji sub-catchment of the Great Ruaha River Basin, Tanzania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(1-2), pages 141-150, September.
    3. Tendler, Judith, 1993. "Tales of dissemination in small-farm agriculture: Lessons for institution builders," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 21(10), pages 1567-1582, October.
    4. Biggs, Stephen D., 1990. "A multiple source of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 18(11), pages 1481-1499, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hall, Andy & Dijkman, Jeroen & Sulaiman, Rasheed, 2010. "Research Into Use: Investigating the Relationship between Agricultural Research and Innovation," MERIT Working Papers 2010-044, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Laurens Klerkx & Andy Hall & Cees Leeuwis, 2009. "Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer?," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(5/6), pages 409-438.
    3. Hall, A., 2004. "New patterns of partnership in agricultural research in Africa: institutional lessons from SMIP," IWMI Working Papers H038337, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Hall, Andrew & Bockett, Geoffrey & Taylor, Sarah & Sivamohan, M. V. K . & Clark, Norman, 2001. "Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 783-797, May.
    5. Geof Wood, 1999. "Contesting water in Bangladesh: knowledge, rights and governance," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(5), pages 731-754.
    6. Raina, Rajeswari S. & Sangar, Sunita & Rasheed Sulaiman, V. & Hall, Andrew J., 2006. "The soil sciences in India: Policy lessons for agricultural innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 691-714, June.
    7. Hall, Andrew & Rasheed Sulaiman, V. & Clark, Norman & Yoganand, B., 2003. "From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 213-241, November.
    8. Biggs, Stephen & Smith, Grant, 1998. "Beyond methodologies: Coalition-building for participatory technology development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 239-248, February.
    9. Hall, Andy & Sulaiman, Rasheed & Bezkorowajnyj, Peter, 2008. "Reframing technical change: Livestock Fodder Scarcity Revisited as Innovation Capacity Scarcity: Part 2. A Framework for Analysis," MERIT Working Papers 2008-003, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. T. Fowe & I. Nouiri & B. Ibrahim & H. Karambiri & J. Paturel, 2015. "OPTIWAM: An Intelligent Tool for Optimizing Irrigation Water Management in Coupled Reservoir–Groundwater Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(10), pages 3841-3861, August.
    11. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: Farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 460-472, April.
    12. Graham Thiele & Elske Fliert & Dindo Campilan, 2001. "What happened to participatory research at the International Potato Center?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 18(4), pages 429-446, December.
    13. Igbadun, Henry E. & Tarimo, Andrew K.P.R. & Salim, Baanda A. & Mahoo, Henry F., 2007. "Evaluation of selected crop water production functions for an irrigated maize crop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(1-3), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Andy Hall & Norman Clark, 2010. "What do complex adaptive systems look like and what are the implications for innovation policy?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 308-324.
    15. Omamo, S. W. & Lynam, J. K., 2003. "Agricultural science and technology policy in Africa," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1681-1694, October.
    16. Luxon Nhamo & James Magidi & Adolph Nyamugama & Alistair D. Clulow & Mbulisi Sibanda & Vimbayi G. P. Chimonyo & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2020. "Prospects of Improving Agricultural and Water Productivity through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Glover, Dominic & Poole, Nigel, 2019. "Principles of innovation to build nutrition-sensitive food systems in South Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 63-73.
    18. Reece, J. David, 2007. "Does genomics empower resource-poor farmers? Some critical questions and experiences," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 553-565, May.
    19. Hall, Andy, 2011. "Putting agricultural research into use: Lessons from contested visions of innovation," MERIT Working Papers 2011-076, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Mark Purcell & J. Christopher Brown, 2005. "Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(4), pages 279-297, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5425-:d:553325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.