IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3502-d350159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intention to Use Sustainable Green Logistics Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Su-Young Kwak

    (Department of Global Trade, Dongguk University, Pildong-ro 1gil 30 Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Korea)

  • Woo-Sung Cho

    (Department of International Trade, Dongguk University, Pildong-ro 1gil 30 Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Korea)

  • Gil-Am Seok

    (Department of Buddhist Studies, Dongguk University-Gyeongju, 123, Dongdae-ro, Gyeongju-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 38066, Korea)

  • Seung-Gyun Yoo

    (Department of Global Economics and Commerce, Dongguk University-Gyeongju, 123, Dongdae-ro, Gyeongju-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 38066, Korea)

Abstract

Recently, logistics platforms that facilitate interaction and the exchange and transaction of information have quickly emerged in the Korean domestic market. In order to further advance the development of logistics platforms into green logistics platforms in which participation in the early stages is not active, appropriate checks and balances are needed so that service providers, users, and platform operators can grow together in green logistics platforms. The purpose of this study is to empirically verify the factors affecting participants’ intentions to use green logistics platforms. Out of the 230 questionnaires distributed from 25 June to 11 July 2019, 14 were excluded from analyses due to unsatisfactory responses, while 216 responses were used for statistical processing. The structural equation model (SEM) was used to test hypotheses in this research. The results showed that the network effect and security factors influenced perceived usefulness, and trust did not affect perceived usefulness. Perceived usefulness also significantly influenced the intention to use green logistics platforms. The results of this study present strategies and directions for the future development of green logistics platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Su-Young Kwak & Woo-Sung Cho & Gil-Am Seok & Seung-Gyun Yoo, 2020. "Intention to Use Sustainable Green Logistics Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3502-:d:350159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3502/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3502/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renata Hesse, 2007. "Two-Sided Platform Markets and the Application of the Traditional Antitrust Analytical Framework," CPI Journal, Competition Policy International, vol. 3.
    2. Caillaud, Bernard & Jullien, Bruno, 2003. "Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(2), pages 309-328, Summer.
    3. Akinci, Serkan & Atilgan-Inan, Eda & Aksoy, Safak, 2010. "Re-assessment of E-S-Qual and E-RecS-Qual in a pure service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 232-240, March.
    4. Evans David S., 2003. "Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-sided Platform Industries," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Schilling, Melissa, 1999. "Winning the standards race: : Building installed base and the availability of complementary goods," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 265-274, June.
    6. Jean‐Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Two‐sided markets: a progress report," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 645-667, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hadi Nur Hadi & Rekarti Endi, 2024. "Intention Of Micro And Small Industry Entrepreneurs Toward Using Food Delivery Applications (Case Study In South Jakarta)," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 17(4), pages 727-748.
    2. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki, 2025. "Examining the Relationship Between Sustainable Strategies, Digital Transformation and Organizational Context: Evidence from 3PL Companies in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Lei Zhou & Qianpeng Li & Fachao Li & Chenxia Jin, 2022. "Research on Green Technology Path of Cold-Chain Distribution of Fresh Products Based on Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Xiaofang Lin & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Qing Yang, 2024. "Unveiling the effect of social media marketing activities on logistics brand equity and reuse intention," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura & Jerónimo de Burgos-Jiménez & Antoaneta Boteva-Asenova & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2020. "Trends and New Challenges in the Green Supply Chain: The Reverse Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Jeong Hugh Han & Yingli Wang & Mohamed Naim, 2020. "Narrowing the Gaps: Assessment of Logistics Firms’ Information Technology Flexibility for Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Chunyu Li & Peng Xing & Yanting Li, 2022. "Sustainable Strategy Analysis: Platform Channel Configuration and Slotting Fee Design under Differentiated Quality Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Xiaofang Lin & Abdullah Al Mamun & Qing Yang & Mohammad Masukujjaman, 2023. "Examining the effect of logistics service quality on customer satisfaction and re-use intention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Sisi Ju & Peng Zhang, 2025. "Carbon Emission Reduction Decision-Making in an Online Freight Platform Service Supply Chain Under Carbon Trading Mechanism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    2. Jabbour, Chady & Rey-Valette, Hélène & Maurel, Pierre & Salles, Jean-Michel, 2019. "Spatial data infrastructure management: A two-sided market approach for strategic reflections," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 69-82.
    3. Belleflamme, Paul & Peitz, Martin, 2010. "Platform competition and seller investment incentives," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1059-1076, November.
    4. Hakan Ozalp & Carmelo Cennamo & Annabelle Gawer, 2018. "Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1203-1241, November.
    5. Junic Kim & Jaewook Yoo, 2019. "Platform Growth Model: The Four Stages of Growth Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Pierre Andreoletti & Pierre Gaze & Maxime Menuet, 2015. "Can a Platform Make Profit with Consumer' Mobility? A Two-Sided Monopoly Model with Random Endogenous Side-Swiching," Working Papers halshs-01206576, HAL.
    7. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    8. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107687899, January.
    9. Amelio, Andrea & Jullien, Bruno, 2012. "Tying and freebies in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 436-446.
    10. Veile, Johannes W. & Schmidt, Marie-Christin & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2022. "Toward a new era of cooperation: How industrial digital platforms transform business models in Industry 4.0," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 387-405.
    11. Budzinski, Oliver & Lindstädt-Dreusicke, Nadine, 2019. "The new media economics of video-on-demand markets: Lessons for competition policy (updated version)," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 125, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    12. Jacobides, Michael G. & Cennamo, Carmelo & Gawer, Annabelle, 2024. "Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    13. Pinar Ozcan & Filipe M. Santos, 2015. "The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(10), pages 1486-1512, October.
    14. Christian Stummer & Dennis Kundisch & Reinhold Decker, 2018. "Platform Launch Strategies," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(2), pages 167-173, April.
    15. Filistrucchi, L. & Gerardin, D. & van Damme, E.E.C. & Keunen, S. & Klein, T.J. & Michielsen, T.O. & Wileur, J., 2010. "Mergers in Two-Sided Markets - A Report to the NMa," Other publications TiSEM f901d1fe-8878-444e-a685-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Yuki Inoue & Takeshi Takenaka & Takami Kasasaku & Tadafumi Tamegai & Ryohei Arai, 2023. "How to design platform ecosystems by intrapreneurs: Implications from action design research on IoT-based platform," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Wang, Shiying & Chen, Huimiao & Wu, Desheng, 2019. "Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the O2O era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 131-143.
    18. Yuki Inoue & Masataka Hashimoto & Takeshi Takenaka, 2019. "Effectiveness of Ecosystem Strategies for the Sustainability of Marketplace Platform Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-33, October.
    19. Elizabeth J. Altman & Mary Tripsas, 2013. "Product to Platform Transitions: Organizational Identity Implications," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-045, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2014.
    20. Lei Bao & Yulin Zhang & Vitor Miguel Ribeiro, 2018. "Observability of Incentive Contract and Platform Competition," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 154-180, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3502-:d:350159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.