IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2507-d335861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Leaders’ Positive and Implicit Followership Theory of University Scientific Research Teams on Individual Creativity: the Mediating Effect of Individual Self-Cognition and the Moderating Effect of Proactive Personality

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Wang

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Xinya Liang

    (Educational Statistics and Research Methods, College of Education and Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

Abstract

Leaders’ positive and implicit followership theory (LPIFT) in a university scientific research team influences innovation in university scientific research. Individual creativity is an important aspect of innovation in university scientific research. However, the influence mechanism of LPIFT of a university scientific research team on individual creativity remains unclear. Based on social cognitive theory and the input–process–output (IPO) theoretical model, we selected a postgraduate supervisor and postgraduates of a university scientific research team as the research objects. We explored the influence between LPIFT of a university scientific research team leader and individual creativity using a questionnaire. A total of 413 valid paired samples were collected from the postgraduate and postgraduate supervisor. We drew the following conclusions: LPIFT of the university scientific research team had a direct positive effect on individual creativity. Individual creative role identity, individual creative self-efficacy, and individual willingness to create knowledge had completely mediating effects on the relationship between LPIFT of the university scientific research team and individual creativity. Proactive personality positively moderated the relationship between LPIFT of the university scientific research team and individual creative role identity, as well as LPIFT of the university scientific research team and individual creative self-efficacy. Proactive personality also positively moderated the mediating effect of individual creative role identity and individual creative self-efficacy. However, the moderating effect of proactive personality between LPIFT of university research teams and individual willingness to create knowledge was not significant. Proactive personality also did not positively moderate the mediating effect of individual willingness to create knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Wang & Xinya Liang, 2020. "The Influence of Leaders’ Positive and Implicit Followership Theory of University Scientific Research Teams on Individual Creativity: the Mediating Effect of Individual Self-Cognition and the Moderati," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2507-:d:335861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2507/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2507/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renee Newman-Storen, 2014. "Leadership in Sustainability: Creating an Interface between Creativity and Leadership Theory in Dealing with “Wicked Problems”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Delia Deliu, 2019. "Empathetic Leadership – Key Element for Inspiring Strategic Management and a Visionary Effective Corporate Governance," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 280-292, November.
    3. Shufang Huang & Jin Chen & Liang Mei & Weiqiao Mo, 2019. "The Effect of Heterogeneity and Leadership on Innovation Performance: Evidence from University Research Teams in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Muhammad Asif & Miao Qing & Jinsoo Hwang & Hao Shi, 2019. "Ethical Leadership, Affective Commitment, Work Engagement, and Creativity: Testing a Multiple Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Che-Chun Kuo & Yun-Ci Ye & Mei-Yen Chen & Lung Hung Chen, 2019. "Proactive personality enhances change in employees’ job satisfaction: The moderating role of psychological safety," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 482-494, August.
    6. Sy, Thomas, 2010. "What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 73-84, November.
    7. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Arts, Joep W.C. & Frambach, Ruud T. & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2011. "Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 134-144.
    9. Fahad Ghabban & Ali Selamat & Roliana Ibrahim & Ondrej Krejcar & Petra Maresova & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2019. "The Influence of Personal and Organizational Factors on Researchers’ Attitudes towards Sustainable Research Productivity in Saudi Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    2. Luceri, Beatrice & (Tammo) Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Bellini, Silvia & Aiolfi, Simone, 2022. "What drives consumers to shop on mobile devices? Insights from a Meta-Analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 178-196.
    3. Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams, 2015. "Examining the role of three sets of innovation attributes for determining adoption of the interbank mobile payment service," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1039-1056, October.
    4. August Francesc Corrons Giménez & Lluís Garay Tamajón, 2019. "An Analysis of the Process of Adopting Local Digital Currencies in Support of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    6. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    7. Nuanphromsakul, Kajohnjak & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna & Kot, Sebastian & Chaveesuk, Singha & Chaiyasoonthorn, Wornchanok, 2022. "Sustainability of Rubber Farmers Cooperatives: Empirical Evaluation of Determining Factors," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4), December.
    8. Paul-Emmanuel Pichon & Denis Bories & Christian Laborde, 2023. "The determinants of the adoption of cryptocurrencies in the tourism industry : Application to the case of hotel room reservations [Les déterminants de l'adoption des cryptomonnaies : application au," Post-Print hal-04398288, HAL.
    9. Mark Shevlin & David Boyda & James Houston & Jamie Murphy, 2015. "Measurement of the psychosis continuum: Modelling the frequency and distress of subclinical psychotic experiences," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 108-118, April.
    10. Joey F George & Rui Chen & Lingyao Yuan, 2021. "Intent to purchase IoT home security devices: Fear vs privacy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    11. E. Huebner & Rich Gilman & James Laughlin, 1999. "A Multimethod Investigation of the Multidimensionality of Children's Well-Being Reports: Discriminant Validity of Life Satisfaction and Self-Esteem," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Ali Safarnejad & Jose-Antonio Izazola-Licea, 2017. "Direct and indirect effects of enablers on HIV testing, initiation and retention in antiretroviral treatment and AIDS related mortality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    14. Lili Tian & Li Zhang & E. Scott Huebner & Xiaoting Zheng & Wang Liu, 2016. "The Longitudinal Relationship Between School Belonging and Subjective Well-Being in School Among Elementary School Students," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 1269-1285, December.
    15. Jonas Schmidt & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2020. "Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 499-518, May.
    16. Ronald S. Burt, 1973. "Confirmatory Factor-Analytic Structures and the Theory Construction Process," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 2(2), pages 131-190, November.
    17. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.
    18. Chuhan Chen & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2023. "The Influence of Multistakeholder Value Cognition and Risk Attitudes on Sustainable Interior Landscape Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Hoon S. Choi & Darrell Carpenter & Myung S. Ko, 2022. "Risk Taking Behaviors Using Public Wi-Fi™," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 965-982, June.
    20. Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Ziska Fields & Ethel Abe, 2017. "Cultural Values and Human Resource Outcomes in the Nigerian Banking Industry," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(2), pages 26-46, April-Jun.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2507-:d:335861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.