IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1473-d321376.html

A Market-Based Economic Instrument to Better Use Water in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Oana Brînzan

    (Faculty of Food Engineering, Tourism and Environmental Protection, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Str. Elena Drăgoi, no 2, 310330 Arad, Romania)

  • Marian Drăgoi

    (Faculty of Forestry, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Str. Universitatii, 13, 720225 Suceava, Romania)

  • Dalia Bociort

    (S.C. Water Company Arad S.A., Str. Sabin Drăgoi, Nr. 2-4, 312330 Arad, Romania)

  • Eugenia Țigan

    (Faculty of Food Engineering, Tourism and Environmental Protection, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Str. Elena Drăgoi, no 2, 310330 Arad, Romania)

  • Nicoleta Mateoc-Sîrb

    (Department of Management and Rural Development, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Aradului 119, Timis, 300645 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Monica Lungu

    (Faculty of Food Engineering, Tourism and Environmental Protection, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Str. Elena Drăgoi, no 2, 310330 Arad, Romania)

Abstract

The paper presents a market-oriented system of returnable guarantees that can be combined with tradable permits to encourage farmers to use alternative sources of water instead of the regular watering network, or to steer the farming system toward environmentally-friendly systems like low tillage and/or organic farming. Factual data from real farming were bootstrapped to test whether or not a set of farms could save water and reduce chemical input due to the higher cost of maintaining the status quo. Based on interactions between water, pesticides, fertilizers, and crops, the system of returnable guarantee determines the farmers to reduce the amount of water harvested from aquifers, generates benefits for the most environmentally-friendly farmers, and stimulate conversion to organic farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana Brînzan & Marian Drăgoi & Dalia Bociort & Eugenia Țigan & Nicoleta Mateoc-Sîrb & Monica Lungu, 2020. "A Market-Based Economic Instrument to Better Use Water in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1473-:d:321376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aurora García-Gallego & Nikolaos Georgantzís & Roberto Hernán-González & Praveen Kujal, 2012. "How do Markets Manage Water Resources? An Experiment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(1), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Wigier, Marek (ed.) & Kowalski, Andrzej (ed.), 2018. "The CAP and national priorities within the EU budget after 2020," Multiannual Program Reports 302754, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    3. Brooks, Robert & Harris, Edwyna, 2008. "Efficiency gains from water markets: Empirical analysis of Watermove in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 391-399, April.
    4. S. I. Efe, 2006. "Quality of rainwater harvesting for rural communities of Delta State, Nigeria," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 175-181, September.
    5. Andersson, Fredrik, 1997. "Small Pollution Markets: Tradable Permits versus Revelation Mechanisms," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 38-50, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Efthymios Rodias & Eirini Aivazidou & Charisios Achillas & Dimitrios Aidonis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Water-Energy-Nutrients Synergies in the Agrifood Sector: A Circular Economy Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Cusworth & Jennifer Dodsworth, 2021. "Using the ‘good farmer’ concept to explore agricultural attitudes to the provision of public goods. A case study of participants in an English agri-environment scheme," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 929-941, December.
    2. Gohar, Abdelaziz A. & Ward, Frank A., 2010. "Gains from expanded irrigation water trading in Egypt: An integrated basin approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2535-2548, October.
    3. William Nikolakis & Quentin Grafton, 2011. "Are there incentives to integrate to land and water management across northern Australia?," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 10109, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    4. Raffensperger, John F., 2011. "Matching users' rights to available groundwater," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1041-1050, April.
    5. Simon de Bonviller & Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Rozan, 2020. "More market, more efficiency? Water market impacts on water use efficiency in the Australian agricultural sector," Working Papers of BETA 2020-14, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. Zaman, A.M. & Malano, H.M. & Davidson, B., 2009. "An integrated water trading-allocation model, applied to a water market in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 149-159, January.
    7. Agbola, Frank W. & Evans, Nigel, 2012. "Modelling rice and cotton acreage response in the Murray Darling Basin in Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 74-82.
    8. William Nikolakis & Aimee Nygaard & Quentin Grafton, 2011. "Adapting to climate change for water resource management: Issues for northern Australia," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 10108, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    9. Simon de Bonviller & Alec Zuo & Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2019. "Is there evidence of insider trading in Australian water markets?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(2), pages 307-327, April.
    10. de Bonviller, Simon & Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Zuo, Alec, 2020. "The dynamics of groundwater markets: Price leadership and groundwater demand elasticity in the Murrumbidgee, Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    11. Alexandros Maziotis & Elisa Calliari & Jaroslav Mysiak, 2013. "Robust Institutions for Sustainable Water Markets: A Survey of the Literature and the Way Forward," Working Papers 2013.58, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Wheeler, Sarah Ann, 2022. "Debunking Murray-Darling Basin water trade myths," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(04), January.
    13. S. Efe, 2010. "Spatial variation in acid and some heavy metal composition of rainwater harvesting in the oil-producing region of Nigeria," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(2), pages 307-319, November.
    14. Speelman, Stijn & Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan, 2013. "Heterogeneous preferences for water rights reforms among smallholder irrigators in South Africa," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Harstad, Bård & Eskeland, Gunnar S., 2010. "Trading for the future: Signaling in permit markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(9-10), pages 749-760, October.
    16. Eduardo Araral & Yahua Wang, 2013. "Water Governance 2.0: A Review and Second Generation Research Agenda," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(11), pages 3945-3957, September.
    17. Ali Akbar Jamali & Reza Ghorbani Kalkhajeh, 2020. "Spatial Modeling Considering valley’s Shape and Rural Satisfaction in Check Dams Site Selection and Water Harvesting in the Watershed," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3331-3344, August.
    18. Finger, Robert, 2012. "Modeling the sensitivity of agricultural water use to price variability and climate change—An application to Swiss maize production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 135-143.
    19. Brooks, Robert & Harris, Edwyna, 2014. "Price leadership and information transmission in Australian water allocation markets," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 83-91.
    20. Speelman, Stijn & Veettil, Prakashan Chellatan, 2012. "Comparing the scope for irrigation water rights reforms in India and South Africa," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126731, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1473-:d:321376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.