IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p9944-d452451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Categorizing Quality Determinants in Mining User-Generated Contents

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Barravecchia

    (Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Luca Mastrogiacomo

    (Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

  • Fiorenzo Franceschini

    (Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

User-Generated Contents (UGCs) are gaining increasing popularity as a source of valuable information for companies to manage the quality of their products, services and Product-Service Systems (PSS). This paper aims at proposing a novel approach to identify and categorize quality determinants through the analysis of an extensive database of UGCs. In detail, this paper applies a topic modeling algorithm (Structural Topic Model) to identify quality determinants and introduces the Mean Rating Proportion measurement for their classification into three categories: negative, positive and neutral quality determinants. The application of the proposed methodology is exemplified through the analysis of a PSS case study (car-sharing).

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Barravecchia & Luca Mastrogiacomo & Fiorenzo Franceschini, 2020. "Categorizing Quality Determinants in Mining User-Generated Contents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9944-:d:452451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaheen, Susan A & Cohen, Adam P, 2007. "Growth in Worldwide Carsharing: An International Comparison," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2zv240pp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Feinerer, Ingo & Hornik, Kurt & Meyer, David, 2008. "Text Mining Infrastructure in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 25(i05).
    3. Margaret E. Roberts & Brandon M. Stewart & Dustin Tingley & Christopher Lucas & Jetson Leder‐Luis & Shana Kushner Gadarian & Bethany Albertson & David G. Rand, 2014. "Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 1064-1082, October.
    4. Guo, Yue & Barnes, Stuart J. & Jia, Qiong, 2017. "Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 467-483.
    5. Boyacı, Burak & Zografos, Konstantinos G. & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2015. "An optimization framework for the development of efficient one-way car-sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 718-733.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuyue Huang & Lena Jingen Liang & Hwansuk Chris Choi, 2022. "How We Failed in Context: A Text-Mining Approach to Understanding Hotel Service Failures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Philipp Ströhle & Christoph M. Flath & Johannes Gärttner, 2019. "Leveraging Customer Flexibility for Car-Sharing Fleet Optimization," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 42-61, February.
    4. Kaspi, Mor & Raviv, Tal & Tzur, Michal & Galili, Hila, 2016. "Regulating vehicle sharing systems through parking reservation policies: Analysis and performance bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 969-987.
    5. Eunhye Park & Junehee Kwon & Bongsug (Kevin) Chae & Sung-Bum Kim, 2021. "What Are the Salient and Memorable Green-Restaurant Attributes? Capturing Customer Perceptions From User-Generated Content," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    6. Amirmahdi Tafreshian & Neda Masoud & Yafeng Yin, 2020. "Frontiers in Service Science: Ride Matching for Peer-to-Peer Ride Sharing: A Review and Future Directions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2-3), pages 44-60, June.
    7. Eunhye Park & Junehee Kwon & Sung-Bum Kim, 2021. "Green Marketing Strategies on Online Platforms: A Mixed Approach of Experiment Design and Topic Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Woohyuk Kim & Sung-Bum Kim & Eunhye Park, 2021. "Mapping Tourists’ Destination (Dis)Satisfaction Attributes with User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Kolomoyets, Yuliya & Dickinger, Astrid, 2023. "Understanding value perceptions and propositions: A machine learning approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Imran Ali & Devika Kannan, 2022. "Mapping research on healthcare operations and supply chain management: a topic modelling-based literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 29-55, August.
    11. Mengshi Lu & Zhihao Chen & Siqian Shen, 2018. "Optimizing the Profitability and Quality of Service in Carshare Systems Under Demand Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 162-180, May.
    12. Kraus, Sascha & Kumar, Satish & Lim, Weng Marc & Kaur, Jaspreet & Sharma, Anuj & Schiavone, Francesco, 2023. "From moon landing to metaverse: Tracing the evolution of Technological Forecasting and Social Change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Wang, Binni & Wang, Pong & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Customer satisfaction service match and service quality-based blockchain cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Sandra Wankmüller, 2023. "A comparison of approaches for imbalanced classification problems in the context of retrieving relevant documents for an analysis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 91-163, April.
    16. Boyacı, Burak & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2019. "Investigating the effect of temporal and spatial flexibility on the performance of one-way electric carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 244-272.
    17. Grinis, Inna, 2017. "The STEM requirements of "non-STEM" jobs: evidence from UK online vacancy postings and implications for skills & knowledge shortages," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85123, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Minchul Lee & Min Song, 2020. "Incorporating citation impact into analysis of research trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1191-1224, August.
    19. Alessandro Avenali & Yuri Maria Chianese & Graziano Ciucciarelli & Giorgio Grani & Laura Palagi, 2019. "Profit optimization in one-way free float car sharing services: a user based relocation strategy relying on price differentiation and Urban Area Values," DIAG Technical Reports 2019-04, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    20. Shuang Liu & Kirsten Maclean & Cathy Robinson, 2019. "A cost-effective framework to prioritise stakeholder participation options," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 221-241, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9944-:d:452451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.