IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9215-d440642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regenerative Belt Conveyor versus Haul Truck-Based Transport: Polish Open-Pit Mines Facing Sustainable Development Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Witold Kawalec

    (Department of Mining and Geodesy, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, ul. Na Grobli 15, 50-421 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Robert Król

    (Department of Mining and Geodesy, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, ul. Na Grobli 15, 50-421 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Natalia Suchorab

    (Department of Mining and Geodesy, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, ul. Na Grobli 15, 50-421 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

The mining industry is facing sustainable development challenges, among which the energy efficiency issues seem to be of major importance. As transport of the mined ore is considered as one of the most energy intensive operations, the improvement of its energy efficiency is a key indicator in terms of sustainable actions taken by mining companies. In open-pit mines, the material handling operations are mostly performed with trucks. Their electrified version—truck trolley systems—surpass diesel trucks’ efficiency while comparing the increased production capacity and the reduction of maintenance cost and fuel consumption. The paper analyzes the opportunities and benefits of the replacement of an ore transport system based on hauling trucks with a regenerative belt conveying in an open-pit mine. Presented case study has been analyzed from energy consumption and environmental impact reduction perspectives. Generally, conception of a regenerative conveyor is based on recuperation of energy or continuous braking needed while a conveyor is running downhill. Energy generated during the braking process (converted from the potential gravitational energy of the conveyed material) is fed back to the electrical grid. Then the regenerative conveyor can be considered as a machine that mines energy as an additional by-product of an exploited deposit. It was shown that difference in transportation cost between haul trucks and energy efficient regenerative conveyors is around 95%. The paper points the conditioning elements to allow the implementation of a regenerative belt conveyor system.

Suggested Citation

  • Witold Kawalec & Robert Król & Natalia Suchorab, 2020. "Regenerative Belt Conveyor versus Haul Truck-Based Transport: Polish Open-Pit Mines Facing Sustainable Development Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9215-:d:440642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Witold Kawalec & Natalia Suchorab & Martyna Konieczna-Fuławka & Robert Król, 2020. "Specific Energy Consumption of a Belt Conveyor System in a Continuous Surface Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton & Julie Bernard, 2019. "Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1111-1125, November.
    3. Zhang, Shirong & Xia, Xiaohua, 2010. "Optimal control of operation efficiency of belt conveyor systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 1929-1937, June.
    4. Numbi, B.P. & Zhang, J. & Xia, X., 2014. "Optimal energy management for a jaw crushing process in deep mines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 337-348.
    5. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton, 2019. "Assessing and Improving the Quality of Sustainability Reports: The Auditors’ Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 703-721, March.
    6. Hilson, Gavin & Murck, Barbara, 2000. "Sustainable development in the mining industry: clarifying the corporate perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 227-238, December.
    7. Sahoo, Lalit Kumar & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu & Banerjee, Rangan, 2014. "Benchmarking energy consumption for dump trucks in mines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1382-1396.
    8. Lee, Dasheng & Cheng, Chin-Chi, 2016. "Energy savings by energy management systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 760-777.
    9. He, Daijie & Pang, Yusong & Lodewijks, Gabriel, 2017. "Green operations of belt conveyors by means of speed control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 330-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Witold Kawalec & Robert Król, 2021. "Generating of Electric Energy by a Declined Overburden Conveyor in a Continuous Surface Mine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    2. Mirosław Bajda & Monika Hardygóra, 2021. "Analysis of the Influence of the Type of Belt on the Energy Consumption of Transport Processes in a Belt Conveyor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Mu, Yunfei & Yao, Taiang & Jia, Hongjie & Yu, Xiaodan & Zhao, Bo & Zhang, Xuesong & Ni, Chouwei & Du, Lijia, 2020. "Optimal scheduling method for belt conveyor system in coal mine considering silo virtual energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Zhang, Shirong & Mao, Wei, 2017. "Optimal operation of coal conveying systems assembled with crushers using model predictive control methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 65-76.
    5. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Víctor Amor-Esteban & David Galindo-Álvarez, 2020. "Communication Strategies for the 2030 Agenda Commitments: A Multivariate Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Wanjiru, Evan M. & Xia, Xiaohua, 2015. "Energy-water optimization model incorporating rooftop water harvesting for lawn irrigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 521-531.
    7. Numbi, B.P. & Xia, X., 2016. "Optimal energy control of a crushing process based on vertical shaft impactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1653-1661.
    8. Kathleen M. Bakarich & John “Jack” Castonguay & Patrick E. O'Brien, 2020. "The Use of Blockchains to Enhance Sustainability Reporting and Assurance†," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 389-412, December.
    9. Numbi, B.P. & Xia, X., 2015. "Systems optimization model for energy management of a parallel HPGR crushing process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 133-147.
    10. Numbi, B.P. & Malinga, S.J., 2017. "Optimal energy cost and economic analysis of a residential grid-interactive solar PV system- case of eThekwini municipality in South Africa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P1), pages 28-45.
    11. Păunescu Carmen & Blid Laura, 2016. "Effective energy planning for improving the enterprise’s energy performance," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 512-531, September.
    12. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Hesam Dehghani & Marc Bascompta & Ali Asghar Khajevandi & Kiana Afshar Farnia, 2023. "A Mimic Model Approach for Impact Assessment of Mining Activities on Sustainable Development Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. S.R. Patterson & E. Kozan & P. Hyland, 2016. "An integrated model of an open-pit coal mine: improving energy efficiency decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 4213-4227, July.
    15. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ahmed Hasanein & Ibrahim Elshaer, 2020. "Influences of Green Human Resources Management on Environmental Performance in Small Lodging Enterprises: The Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Pascal A. Schirmer & Iosif Mporas, 2019. "Statistical and Electrical Features Evaluation for Electrical Appliances Energy Disaggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Elena Stefana & Paola Cocca & Filippo Marciano & Diana Rossi & Giuseppe Tomasoni, 2019. "A Review of Energy and Environmental Management Practices in Cast Iron Foundries to Increase Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9215-:d:440642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.