IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6871-d403350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Environmental Purification Effect of Riparian Forest with Poplar Trees for Ecological Watershed Management: A Case Study in the Floodplain of the Dam Reservoir in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Gwon-Soo Bahn

    (Department of Water Environmental Management, K-Water, Daejeon 34350, Korea
    Department of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Byung-Chul An

    (Department of Forest∙Landscape Architecture & Institute for Environmental Science, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea)

Abstract

The Total Nitrogen(T-N) and Total Phosphors(T-P) contents in the soils of three riparian forests with poplar trees were compared with the surrounding cultivated and uncultivated lands. Three key results were obtained by analyzing poplar tree volume and the T-N and T-P content in the plant body. First, in soil surveys covering 36 points, the T-N and T-P content in the riparian forests were 0.064% and 0.036%, respectively, whereas in non-riparian forests, they were 0.147% and 0.101%, respectively. The two areas had significantly different T-N and T-P values. Within the non-riparian-forest category, the T-N and T-P content in cultivated land was 0.174% and 0.103%, respectively, showing significant differences from riparian forest values. When comparing riparian forests and uncultivated land, the T-N contents were not significantly different ( p > 0.113), but the T-P content of 0.095% showed a significant difference ( p < 0.006). Second, the total poplar tree volumes of the riparian forest test sites 1, 2, and 3 were 466.46 m 3 , 171.34 m 3 , and 75.76 m 3, respectively. The T-N and T-P accumulation per unit area was the largest in site 1, at 497.75 kg/ha and 112.73 kg/ha, respectively. The larger the tree volume, the larger the T-N and T-P accumulation in the plant body, and the lower the T-N and T-P content in the soil. Third, analyzing the T-N and T-P removal rate in relation to the environmental conditions of the riparian forests showed that site 3 had the smallest total poplar tree content, and the T-N and T-P accumulation per unit area (ha) was also relatively low at just 56% and 68% of the average value. The main causes of this outcome are thought to be the differences in environmental conditions, such as the crop cultivated before poplar planting began and the terrain. The research results verify that riparian forests with poplar trees reduced T-N and T-P content in the soils. The growth of poplar is expected to increase the removal of T-N and T-P from the soil and contribute to the reduction of various nonpoint source pollution flows into rivers and lakes and to the purification of soil in flooded areas. Therefore, riparian forests can act as a form of green infrastructure and as a system to remove nonpoint source pollution in ecological watershed management.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwon-Soo Bahn & Byung-Chul An, 2020. "Analysis of Environmental Purification Effect of Riparian Forest with Poplar Trees for Ecological Watershed Management: A Case Study in the Floodplain of the Dam Reservoir in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6871-:d:403350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6871/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6871/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ribaudo, Marc & Delgado, Jorge & Hansen, LeRoy T. & Livingston, Michael J. & Mosheim, Roberto & Williamson, James M., 2011. "Nitrogen in Agricultural Systems: Implications for Conservation Policy," Economic Research Report 118022, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Thomas Mendlik & Andreas Gobiet, 2016. "Selecting climate simulations for impact studies based on multivariate patterns of climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 381-393, April.
    3. Xiaosi Su & Huang Wang & Yuling Zhang, 2013. "Health Risk Assessment of Nitrate Contamination in Groundwater: A Case Study of an Agricultural Area in Northeast China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(8), pages 3025-3034, June.
    4. Greg Browder & Suzanne Ozment & Irene Rehberger Bescos & Todd Gartner & Glenn-Marie Lange, 2019. "Integrating Green and Gray," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 31430, December.
    5. Kevin Parris, 2011. "Impact of Agriculture on Water Pollution in OECD Countries: Recent Trends and Future Prospects," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 33-52, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amon-Armah, Frederick & Yiridoe, Emmanuel K. & Hebb, Dale & Jamieson, Rob, 2013. "Nitrogen abatement cost comparison for cropping systems under alternative management choices," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149915, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Morten Graversgaard & Beatrice Hedelin & Laurence Smith & Flemming Gertz & Anker Lajer Højberg & John Langford & Grit Martinez & Erik Mostert & Emilia Ptak & Heidi Peterson & Nico Stelljes & Cors Van , 2018. "Opportunities and Barriers for Water Co-Governance—A Critical Analysis of Seven Cases of Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture in Europe, Australia and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-39, May.
    3. Singh, Simratpal & Coppi, Luca & Wang, Zijian & Tenuta, Mario & Holländer, Hartmut M., 2019. "Regionalisation of nitrate leaching on pasture land in Southern Manitoba," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 286-300.
    4. Fawen Li & Yong Zhao & Ping Feng & Wei Zhang & Jiale Qiao, 2015. "Risk Assessment of Groundwater and its Application. Part I: Risk Grading Based on the Functional Zoning of Groundwater," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2697-2714, June.
    5. Hardeep Singh & Brian K. Northup & Gurjinder S. Baath & Prashanth P. Gowda & Vijaya G. Kakani, 2020. "Greenhouse mitigation strategies for agronomic and grazing lands of the US Southern Great Plains," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 819-853, May.
    6. Gianfranco Sanna & Silvia Serreli & Giovanni Maria Biddau, 2020. "Policies and Architectures for the Unthinkable Era: New Resilient Landscapes in Fragile Areas of Sardinia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Fayaz A. Lone & Showkat A. Ganaie & M. Imran Ganaie & Javeed A. Rather & Jahangeer A. Parry, 2022. "Is paddy cultivation in Kashmir Valley still a profitable activity? Geo-economic analysis across physiographic divisions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Juan Benavides & Marthe E. Delgado-Rojas & Felipe Castro & Alejandra Fonseca & Sebastián Bernal, 2022. "Documento de Análisis Regulatorio y Económico Sectorial - ARES Colombia 2022," Informes de Investigación 20739, Fedesarrollo.
    9. Buzby, Jean C. & Farah-Wells, Hodan & Hyman, Jeffrey, 2014. "The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 164262, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Pratik Pathak & Ajay Kalra & Sajjad Ahmad, 2017. "Temperature and precipitation changes in the Midwestern United States: implications for water management," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 1003-1019, November.
    11. Agarwal, Sandip & Jacobs, Keri L. & Weninger, Quinn, 2016. "Unfolding the Bias in Farm Nitrogen Management," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 237380, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Alessandro Dosio & Christopher Lennard & Jonathan Spinoni, 2022. "Projections of indices of daily temperature and precipitation based on bias-adjusted CORDEX-Africa regional climate model simulations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Cyril Bourgeois & Pierre-Alain Jayet & Florence Habets & Pascal Viennot, 2018. "Estimating the Marginal Social Value of Agriculturally Driven Nitrate Concentrations in an Aquifer: A Combined Theoretical-Applied Approach," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-30, January.
    14. Wujuan Mi & Minghua Zhang & Yuan Li & Xiaoxuan Jing & Wei Pan & Xin Xing & Chen Xiao & Qiusheng He & Yonghong Bi, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Groundwater Nitrate-Nitrogen and Its Potential Human Health Risk in a Severe Water Shortage Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-12, September.
    15. Riwaz Kumar Adhikari & Abdullah Gokhan Yilmaz & Bandita Mainali & Phil Dyson & Monzur Alam Imteaz, 2022. "Methods of Groundwater Recharge Estimation under Climate Change: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Mengyuan Zhang & Shuaipeng Chen & Wenping Liu, 2023. "Disentangling the Complexity of Regional Ecosystem Degradation: Uncovering the Interconnected Natural-Social Drivers of Quantity and Quality Loss," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Chyzheuskaya, Aksana & O’Donoghue, Cathal & O’Neill, Stephen & Hynes, Stephen, 2015. "Using A Spatialmicrosimulationmodel To Estimate The Potential Economic Impact On Agriculture Of Possible Freshwater Pearl Mussel Protection Strategies," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212666, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Andrew C. Ross & Raymond G. Najjar, 2019. "Evaluation of methods for selecting climate models to simulate future hydrological change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 407-428, December.
    19. Konstantinos Metaxoglou & Aaron Smith, 2022. "Nutrient Pollution and US Agriculture: Causal Effects, Integrated Assessment, and Implications of Climate Change," NBER Chapters, in: American Agriculture, Water Resources, and Climate Change, pages 297-341, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. McCann, Laura, 2013. "Transaction costs and environmental policy design," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 253-262.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6871-:d:403350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.