IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p5999-d389906.html

Managing Multiple Projects in Uncertain Contexts: A Case Study on the Application of a New Approach Based on the Critical Chain Method

Author

Listed:
  • Unai Apaolaza

    (Mondragon Goi Eskola Politeknikoa, Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Loramendi 4, 20500 Mondragon, Spain)

  • Aitor Lizarralde

    (Mondragon Goi Eskola Politeknikoa, Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Loramendi 4, 20500 Mondragon, Spain)

Abstract

Uncertainty and change are two features of modern project management. They strongly influence the project management needs to operate in such contexts. This is the case when a complete and accurate definition of the scope of a project is not available. Those situations require a project management approach capable of dealing with the special conditions that characterise said contexts. This study focuses on the application of the progressive elaboration approach and the Critical Chain method. We analysed the implementation process of the new procedure in a company that produces capital goods for the automotive industry. The work’s main focus is on the effect of this change from the multi-project perspective. We found that the change had a larger impact than was expected by the company. Firstly, we found that the new approach provided an opportunity to improve the performance of the company. Besides, the new approach uncovered significant problems that previously were ignored, as well as problems and obstacles to the change. Based on the results and findings of this work, we conclude that shifting to this kind of approach requires a global managerial perspective, and strong support from the management.

Suggested Citation

  • Unai Apaolaza & Aitor Lizarralde, 2020. "Managing Multiple Projects in Uncertain Contexts: A Case Study on the Application of a New Approach Based on the Critical Chain Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5999-:d:389906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lutz, Stefan & Loedding, Hermann & Wiendahl, Hans-Peter, 2003. "Logistics-oriented inventory analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 217-231, August.
    2. Mandyam M. Srinivasan & William D. Best & Sridhar Chandrasekaran, 2007. "Warner Robins Air Logistics Center Streamlines Aircraft Repair and Overhaul," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 7-21, February.
    3. Michael T. Pich & Christoph H. Loch & Arnoud De Meyer, 2002. "On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1008-1023, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hafsa Chbaly & Daniel Forgues & Samia Ben Rajeb, 2021. "Towards a Framework for Promoting Communication during Project Definition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Victor Jiménez & Paulo Afonso & Gabriela Fernandes, 2020. "Using Agile Project Management in the Design and Implementation of Activity-Based Costing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Unai Apaolaza & Aitor Lizarralde & Aitor Oyarbide-Zubillaga, 2020. "Modern Project Management Approaches in Uncertainty Environments: A Comparative Study Based on Action Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Agathe Gilain & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Managing Learning Curves In The Unknown: From ‘Learning By Doing’ To ‘Learning By Designing’," Post-Print hal-01900961, HAL.
    3. Sylvain Lenfle & Christoph Loch, 2017. "Has Megaproject management lost its way ? Lessons from History," Post-Print hal-03640779, HAL.
    4. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    5. Feduzi, Alberto & Runde, Jochen, 2014. "Uncovering unknown unknowns: Towards a Baconian approach to management decision-making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 268-283.
    6. Tao, Liangyan & Wu, Desheng & Liu, Sifeng & Lambert, James H., 2017. "Schedule risk analysis for new-product development: The GERT method extended by a characteristic function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 464-473.
    7. de Vries, Jan, 2007. "Diagnosing inventory management systems: An empirical evaluation of a conceptual approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 63-73, July.
    8. Shipley, Margaret F. & Johnson, Madeline, 2009. "A fuzzy approach for selecting project membership to achieve cognitive style goals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 918-928, February.
    9. Cisnetto, Valentina & Barlow, James, 2020. "The development of complex and controversial innovations. Genetically modified mosquitoes for malaria eradication," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    10. Van Vliet, Ben, 2017. "Capability satisficing in high frequency trading," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 509-521.
    11. Indranil R. Bardhan & Vish V. Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2007. "Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 579-595, May.
    12. Aga, Deribe Assefa, 2016. "Factors affecting the success of development projects : A behavioral perspective," Other publications TiSEM 867ae95e-d53d-4a68-ad46-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Narjes Sabeghi & Hamed Reza Tareghian, 2020. "Using the generalized maximum covering location model to control a project’s progress," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    15. Sophie Hooge & Cédric Dalmasso, 2011. "Learning from innovation echoes in mature organizations - The case of the automotive industry," Post-Print hal-00696968, HAL.
    16. Victoria L. Mitchell & Barrie R. Nault, 2007. "Cooperative Planning, Uncertainty, and Managerial Control in Concurrent Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 375-389, March.
    17. Sreekumar A. Menon & Marc Muchnick & Clifford Butler & Tony Pizur, 2021. "Complexity Theory: Insights from a Canadian ERP Project Implementation," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 1-84, July.
    18. Carlos Vallejo & David Romero & Arturo Molina, 2017. "Implementation of best manufacturing practices using logic models and system dynamics: project design and project assessment views," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 535-575, May.
    19. Erin C. McKie & Sanjay Laxman Ahire, 2024. "Enhancing the Reach of Socially Missioned Nonprofits: Insights from a TOC-LP Application," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 127-146, March.
    20. NIYONKURU Schiman & UWIZEYIAMANA Francois, 2024. "Relationship Between Project Management Soft Skills And Project Success In Rwanda," Working papers 2024-49-05, Voice of Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5999-:d:389906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.