IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4447-d365010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy, Exergy, and Sustainability Analyses of the Agricultural Sector in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Tamal Chowdhury

    (Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Kaptai Highway, Raozan, Chattogram 4349, Bangladesh
    Co-first authors.)

  • Hemal Chowdhury

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Kaptai Highway, Raozan, Chattogram 4349, Bangladesh
    Co-first authors.)

  • Ashfaq Ahmed

    (School of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea
    COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Raiwind Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
    Co-first authors.)

  • Young-Kwon Park

    (School of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea)

  • Piyal Chowdhury

    (Chattogram Collegiate School and College, Chattogram 4200, Bangladesh)

  • Nazia Hossain

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Sadiq M. Sait

    (CCITR-RI, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Globally, the agriculture sector consumes a considerable portion of energy. Optimizing energy consumption and energy loss from different fuel-based types of machinery will increase the energy sustainability of this sector. Exergy analysis is a useful optimizing method that applies the thermodynamic approach to minimize energy loss. The main goal of this study is to highlight the impact of exergy loss on the energy sustainability of the agriculture sector. Hence, this study focuses on the implementation of exergy-based sustainability parameters to determine the sustainability of the agricultural sector in Bangladesh. A comprehensive analysis combining energy, exergy, and sustainability indicators was conducted based on the data obtained from 1990 to 2017. Overall energy and exergy efficiencies varied between 29.86% and 36.68% and 28.2% and 35.4%, respectively, whereas the sustainability index varied between 1.39 and 1.54. The values of relative irreversibility and lack of productivity indices from diesel fuel are higher than that of other fuel types. Maximum relative irreversibility is 0.95, whereas maximum lack of productivity is 2.50. The environmental effect factor of diesel fuel is the highest (2.47) among all the analyzed fuel types. Replacing old farming devices and selecting appropriate farming methods, appliances, and control systems will reduce exergy loss in this sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamal Chowdhury & Hemal Chowdhury & Ashfaq Ahmed & Young-Kwon Park & Piyal Chowdhury & Nazia Hossain & Sadiq M. Sait, 2020. "Energy, Exergy, and Sustainability Analyses of the Agricultural Sector in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4447-:d:365010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4447/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4447/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahamed, J.U. & Saidur, R. & Masjuki, H.H. & Mekhilef, S. & Ali, M.B. & Furqon, M.H., 2011. "An application of energy and exergy analysis in agricultural sector of Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7922-7929.
    2. Rosen, Marc A. & Dincer, Ibrahim & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2008. "Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 128-137, January.
    3. Dincer, I. & Hussain, M. M. & Al-Zaharnah, I., 2005. "Energy and exergy utilization in agricultural sector of Saudi Arabia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1461-1467, July.
    4. Yildizhan, Hasan, 2018. "Energy, exergy utilization and CO2 emission of strawberry production in greenhouse and open field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 417-423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yazıcı, Ali Fırat & Olcay, Ali Bahadır & Arkalı Olcay, Gökçen, 2023. "A framework for maintaining sustainable energy use in Bitcoin mining through switching efficient mining hardware," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Ashfaq Ahmed & Muhammad S. Abu Bakar & Abdul Razzaq & Syarif Hidayat & Farrukh Jamil & Muhammad Nadeem Amin & Rahayu S. Sukri & Noor S. Shah & Young-Kwon Park, 2021. "Characterization and Thermal Behavior Study of Biomass from Invasive Acacia mangium Species in Brunei Preceding Thermochemical Conversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Aygun, Hakan & Turan, Onder, 2022. "Application of genetic algorithm in exergy and sustainability: A case of aero-gas turbine engine at cruise phase," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Li & Hailin Mu & Huanan Li & Shusen Gui, 2012. "Diesel Consumption of Agriculture in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Qi, Hai & Dong, Zhiliang & Dong, Shaohui & Sun, Xiaotian & Zhao, Yiran & Li, Yu, 2021. "Extended exergy accounting for smelting and pressing of metals industry in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Rao, D.S. Prasada, 2010. "Measuring and decomposing sustainable efficiency in agricultural production: A cumulative exergy balance approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1765-1776, July.
    4. Franck Armel Talla Konchou & Yemeli Wenceslas Koholé & Ghislain Tchuen & Réné Tchinda, 2023. "Energy, exergy and sustainability assessment of Cameroon residential sector," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12439-12465, November.
    5. Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Alauddin, Mohammad, 2009. "Analysis of Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Exergy Methodologies and Their Application in OECD," MPRA Paper 90406, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Mar 2010.
    6. Yildizhan, Hasan, 2018. "Energy, exergy utilization and CO2 emission of strawberry production in greenhouse and open field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 417-423.
    7. Ricardo Manso & Tânia Sousa & Tiago Domingos, 2017. "Do the Different Exergy Accounting Methodologies Provide Consistent or Contradictory Results? A Case Study with the Portuguese Agricultural, Forestry and Fisheries Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-31, August.
    8. Wu, Junnian & Wang, Ruiqi & Pu, Guangying & Qi, Hang, 2016. "Integrated assessment of exergy, energy and carbon dioxide emissions in an iron and steel industrial network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 430-444.
    9. Alvin Kiprono Bett & Saeid Jalilinasrabady, 2021. "Optimization of ORC Power Plants for Geothermal Application in Kenya by Combining Exergy and Pinch Point Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    10. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    11. Ziya Sogut, M., 2021. "New approach for assessment of environmental effects based on entropy optimization of jet engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. van der Kroon, Bianca & Brouwer, Roy & van Beukering, Pieter J.H., 2013. "The energy ladder: Theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 504-513.
    13. Cullen, Jonathan M. & Allwood, Julian M., 2010. "Theoretical efficiency limits for energy conversion devices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2059-2069.
    14. Maia, Cristiana Brasil & Ferreira, André Guimarães & Cabezas-Gómez, Luben & de Oliveira Castro Silva, Janaína & de Morais Hanriot, Sérgio, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis of the drying process of bananas in a small-scale solar updraft tower in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1005-1012.
    15. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Baskut, Omer & Ozgener, Onder & Ozgener, Leyla, 2010. "Effects of meteorological variables on exergetic efficiency of wind turbine power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3237-3241, December.
    17. Miladi, Rihab & Frikha, Nader & Gabsi, Slimane, 2017. "Exergy analysis of a solar-powered vacuum membrane distillation unit using two models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 872-883.
    18. Hepbasli, Arif & Alsuhaibani, Zeyad, 2011. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic aspects of wind energy systems in achieving sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2810-2825, August.
    19. Ndukwu, M.C. & Bennamoun, L. & Abam, F.I. & Eke, A.B. & Ukoha, D., 2017. "Energy and exergy analysis of a solar dryer integrated with sodium sulfate decahydrate and sodium chloride as thermal storage medium," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1182-1192.
    20. Grubbström, Robert W., 2015. "On the true value of resource consumption when using energy in industrial and other processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 377-384.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4447-:d:365010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.