IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p306-d303473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Relation between BIM Application Behavior and Sustainable Construction: A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Zhang

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Zhenwei Chu

    (School of Business, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Huanbin Song

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM) is based on 3D models for collaborative management of information, which leads the innovative development of information transformation in the construction industry. In recent years, sustainable construction has become a hot topic in construction research. With the concept of sustainable development, this type of construction advocates for the sustainable optimization of construction models and processes. A person’s good behavior can bring enormous potential, which is critical for the promotion of new technology in new areas. Nowadays, the integration of BIM technology and sustainable construction has increasingly attracted attention in the industry of construction. But many issues and gaps still exist when using them. The aim of this study is to investigate the intrinsic relationship between BIM application and sustainable construction from the perspective of user application behavior, and to reveal the key influential factors of BIM application behavior in order to improve the application efficiency of BIM in sustainable construction. Specifically, the present study builds a theoretical model by integrating the theory of planned behavior and BIM application. Based on a questionnaire survey of 353 BIM users, we conducted an empirical analysis using the structural equation model method. The results showed that the perceived usefulness and ease of use of BIM technology are the key influential factors in behavior attitude. BIM behavior intention, actual behavior, and behavior attitude have a positive effect on sustainable construction. Ultimately, practical support is provided for the effective integration of BIM with sustainable construction in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Zhang & Zhenwei Chu & Huanbin Song, 2019. "Understanding the Relation between BIM Application Behavior and Sustainable Construction: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:306-:d:303473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/306/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/306/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrieli Cristina Vieira De Carvalho & Ariovaldo Denis Granja & Vanessa Gomes Da Silva, 2017. "A Systematic Literature Review on Integrative Lean and Sustainability Synergies over a Building’s Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Warsame, Mohammed Hersi & Ireri, Edward Mugambi, 2016. "Does the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) matter in Sukuk investment decisions?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 93-100.
    3. Gao, Hao & Koch, Christian & Wu, Yupeng, 2019. "Building information modelling based building energy modelling: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 320-343.
    4. Chen, Shang-Yu, 2016. "Using the sustainable modified TAM and TPB to analyze the effects of perceived green value on loyalty to a public bike system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 58-72.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Ermal Hetemi & Joaquin Ordieres-Meré & Cali Nuur, 2020. "An Institutional Approach to Digitalization in Sustainability-Oriented Infrastructure Projects: The Limits of the Building Information Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Prabhu, R. Srinivas & Anuradha, R. & Belin Jude, A., 2022. "Understanding the mining waste as resources in self-compacting concrete: A numerical study on sustainable construction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Yu Cao & Liyan Huang & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, 2022. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) Capabilities in the Design and Planning of Rural Settlements in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdullah Alghuried, 2023. "Measuring the Benefits and Barriers of the Implementation of BIM in Sustainable Practice in the Construction Industry of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.
    3. Mihail Mateev, 2024. "Digital Twins Concept For Energy-Efficient Smart Buildings," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 23(1), pages 187-198, June.
    4. Sunwoo Park & Hyejin Yoon & Chulmo Koo & Won Seok Lee, 2021. "Role of the Leisure Attributes of Shared Bicycles in Promoting Leisure Benefits and Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Zhang, Xiang & Li, Wence, 2023. "Effects of a bike sharing system and COVID-19 on low-carbon traffic modal shift and emission reduction," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 42-64.
    6. Rodrigo F. Herrera & M. Amalia Sanz & Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Tatiana García-Segura & Eugenio Pellicer, 2019. "Impact of Game-Based Learning on Understanding Lean Construction Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Lešnik, Maja & Kravanja, Stojan & Premrov, Miroslav & Žegarac Leskovar, Vesna, 2020. "Optimal design of timber-glass upgrade modules for vertical building extension from the viewpoints of energy efficiency and visual comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Yunxin Chen & Dong Qiu & Xiaomin Chen, 2024. "Integrating Lean Construction with Sustainable Construction: Drivers, Dilemmas and Countermeasures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Murat Gunduz & Ayman Fahmi Naser, 2017. "Cost Based Value Stream Mapping as a Sustainable Construction Tool for Underground Pipeline Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Sajjad, Aqsa & Zhang, Qingyu & Asmi, Fahad & Anwar, Muhammad Azfar & Bhatia, Meena, 2024. "Identifying the motivating factors to promote socially responsible consumption under circular economy: A perspective from norm activation theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Dandan Xu & Yang Bian & Shinan Shu, 2020. "Research on the Psychological Model of Free-floating Bike-Sharing Using Behavior: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Jianwu Xiong & Linlin Chen & Yin Zhang, 2023. "Building Energy Saving for Indoor Cooling and Heating: Mechanism and Comparison on Temperature Difference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Darie Gavrilut & Ke Xue, 2021. "Social Media-Based Content towards Image Formation: A New Approach to the Selection of Sustainable Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Sanjin Gumbarević & Ivana Burcar Dunović & Bojan Milovanović & Mergim Gaši, 2020. "Method for Building Information Modeling Supported Project Control of Nearly Zero-Energy Building Delivery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Vo, Nguyen S. & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "Factors influencing intention to use on-demand shared ride-hailing services in Vietnam: risk, cost or sustainability?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Jingnan Zhang & Shichun Xu & Zhengxia He & Chengze Li & Xiaona Meng, 2022. "Factors Influencing Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles under a Subsidy Deduction: From Different City-Level Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Zhang, Sheng & Liu, Jun & Zhang, Xia & Wang, Fenghao, 2024. "Properly shortening design time scale of medium-deep borehole heat exchanger for high building heating performances with high computational efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    19. Muhammad Danish & Saqib Ali & Muhammad Azeem Ahmad & Hasan Zahid, 2019. "The Influencing Factors on Choice Behavior Regarding Green Electronic Products: Based on the Green Perceived Value Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Shahid, Ahmad Usman & Patel, Chris & Pan, Peipei, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility, intrinsic religiosity, and investment decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:306-:d:303473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.