IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2235-d222514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pollution Tradeoffs for Conventional and Natural Gas-Based Marine Fuels

Author

Listed:
  • James J. Winebrake

    (Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • James J. Corbett

    (Marine Policy Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19711, USA)

  • Fatima Umar

    (Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA)

  • Daniel Yuska

    (U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, Washington, DC 20590, USA)

Abstract

This paper presents a life-cycle emissions analysis of conventional and natural gas-based marine transportation in the United States. We apply a total fuel cycle—or “well-to-propeller”—analysis that evaluates emissions along the fuel production and delivery pathway, including feedstock extraction, processing, distribution, and use. We compare emissions profiles for methanol, liquefied natural gas, and low sulfur marine fuel in our analysis, with a focus on exploring tradeoffs across the following pollutants: greenhouse gases, particulate matter, sulfur oxides, and nitrogen oxides. For our greenhouse gas analysis, we apply global warming potentials that consider both near-term (20-year) and long-term (100-year) climate forcing impacts. We also conduct uncertainty analysis to evaluate the impacts of methane leakage within the natural gas recovery, processing, and distribution stages of its fuel cycle. Our results indicate that natural-gas based marine fuels can provide significant local environmental benefits compared to distillate fuel; however, these benefits come with a near-term—and possibly long-term—global warming penalty, unless such natural gas-based fuels are derived from renewable feedstock, such as biomass. These results point to the importance of controlling for methane leaks along the natural gas production process and the important role that renewable natural gas can play in the shipping sector. Decision-makers can use these results to inform decisions related to increasing the use of alternative fuels in short sea and coast-wise marine transportation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • James J. Winebrake & James J. Corbett & Fatima Umar & Daniel Yuska, 2019. "Pollution Tradeoffs for Conventional and Natural Gas-Based Marine Fuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2235-:d:222514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2235/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2235/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J. Plevin, 2009. "Modeling Corn Ethanol and Climate," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(4), pages 495-507, August.
    2. Daniel Zavala-Araiza & Ramón A Alvarez & David R. Lyon & David T. Allen & Anthony J. Marchese & Daniel J. Zimmerle & Steven P. Hamburg, 2017. "Super-emitters in natural gas infrastructure are caused by abnormal process conditions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Nealer, Rachael & Matthews, H. Scott & Hendrickson, Chris, 2012. "Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation effectiveness of potential US modal freight policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 588-601.
    4. Demir, Emrah & Bektaş, Tolga & Laporte, Gilbert, 2014. "A review of recent research on green road freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 775-793.
    5. Thomson, Heather & Corbett, James J. & Winebrake, James J., 2015. "Natural gas as a marine fuel," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 153-167.
    6. Burel, Fabio & Taccani, Rodolfo & Zuliani, Nicola, 2013. "Improving sustainability of maritime transport through utilization of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for propulsion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 412-420.
    7. Yeh, Sonia & Sperling, Daniel, 2010. "Low carbon fuel standards: Implementation scenarios and challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6955-6965, November.
    8. Askin, Amanda C. & Barter, Garrett E. & West, Todd H. & Manley, Dawn K., 2015. "The heavy-duty vehicle future in the United States: A parametric analysis of technology and policy tradeoffs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Gertjan van den Bos & Bart Wiegmans, 2018. "Short sea shipping: a statistical analysis of influencing factors on SSS in European countries," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Mikhail Sofiev & James J. Winebrake & Lasse Johansson & Edward W. Carr & Marje Prank & Joana Soares & Julius Vira & Rostislav Kouznetsov & Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen & James J. Corbett, 2018. "Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Anastassios N. Perakis & Athanasios Denisis, 2008. "A survey of short sea shipping and its prospects in the USA," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 591-614, December.
    12. Francesca Medda & Lourdes Trujillo, 2010. "Short-sea shipping: an analysis of its determinants," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 285-303, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vinicius Andrade dos Santos & Patrícia Pereira da Silva & Luís Manuel Ventura Serrano, 2022. "The Maritime Sector and Its Problematic Decarbonization: A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Alternative Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Alam Md Moshiul & Roslina Mohammad & Fariha Anjum Hira & Nurazean Maarop, 2022. "Alternative Marine Fuel Research Advances and Future Trends: A Bibliometric Knowledge Mapping Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Lixian Fan & Bingmei Gu, 2019. "Impacts of the Increasingly Strict Sulfur Limit on Compliance Option Choices: The Case Study of Chinese SECA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Karin Andersson & Selma Brynolf & Julia Hansson & Maria Grahn, 2020. "Criteria and Decision Support for A Sustainable Choice of Alternative Marine Fuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Martinez-Valencia, Lina & Garcia-Perez, Manuel & Wolcott, Michael P., 2021. "Supply chain configuration of sustainable aviation fuel: Review, challenges, and pathways for including environmental and social benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Alam Md Moshiul & Roslina Mohammad & Fariha Anjum Hira, 2023. "Alternative Fuel Selection Framework toward Decarbonizing Maritime Deep-Sea Shipping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-37, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Kian-Guan Lim & Michelle Lim, 2020. "Financial performance of shipping firms that increase LNG carriers and the support of eco-innovation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Saurí, Sergi & Lago, Alejandro, 2012. "Potential freight distribution improvements using motorways of the sea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Michalis P. Michaelides & Herodotos Herodotou & Mikael Lind & Richard T. Watson, 2019. "Port-2-Port Communication Enhancing Short Sea Shipping Performance: The Case Study of Cyprus and the Eastern Mediterranean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Halff, Antoine & Younes, Lara & Boersma, Tim, 2019. "The likely implications of the new IMO standards on the shipping industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 277-286.
    6. Duan, Zhongdi & Zhu, Yifeng & Wang, Chenbiao & Yuan, Yuchao & Xue, Hongxiang & Tang, Wenyong, 2023. "Numerical and theoretical prediction of the thermodynamic response in marine LNG fuel tanks under sloshing conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    7. Johansson, Magnus & Vierth, Inge & Holmgren, Kristina & Cullinane, Kevin, 2023. "How will electrification and increased use of new fuels affect the effectiveness of freight modal shift policies?," Working Papers 2023:4, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    8. Abisai Konstantinus & Mark Zuidgeest & Anastasia Christodoulou & Zeeshan Raza & Johan Woxenius, 2019. "Barriers and Enablers for Short Sea Shipping in the Southern African Development Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Miguel Ángel López-Navarro, 2014. "Environmental Factors and Intermodal Freight Transportation: Analysis of the Decision Bases in the Case of Spanish Motorways of the Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Kirsi Spoof-Tuomi & Seppo Niemi, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Evaluation of Fuel Choices for Short Sea Shipping," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Khandaker Rasel Hasan & Wei Zhang & Wenming Shi, 2021. "Barriers to intermodal freight diversion: a total logistics cost approach," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 569-586, September.
    12. Ching-Chiao Yang & Hui-Huang Tai & Wen-Hsing Chiu, 2014. "Factors influencing container carriers' use of coastal shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 192-208, March.
    13. Wang, Tingsong & Cheng, Peiyue & Zhen, Lu, 2023. "Green development of the maritime industry: Overview, perspectives, and future research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. José F. Baños & Luis Valdés & Eduardo Valle & Emma Zapico, 2018. "Economic importance of the motorways of the sea for tourism: The experience of the route Nantes–Gijón," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(2), pages 300-320, June.
    15. Gertjan van den Bos & Bart Wiegmans, 2018. "Short sea shipping: a statistical analysis of influencing factors on SSS in European countries," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Kalikatzarakis, Miltiadis & Theotokatos, Gerasimos & Coraddu, Andrea & Sayan, Paul & Wong, Seng Yew, 2022. "Model based analysis of the boil-off gas management and control for LNG fuelled vessels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    17. Antonio Comi & Antonio Polimeni, 2020. "Assessing the Potential of Short Sea Shipping and the Benefits in Terms of External Costs: Application to the Mediterranean Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Lupi, Marino & Farina, Alessandro & Orsi, Denise & Pratelli, Antonio, 2017. "The capability of Motorways of the Sea of being competitive against road transport. The case of the Italian mainland and Sicily," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 9-21.
    19. Dedy Arianto & Edward Marpaung & Johny Malisan & Windra Priatna Humang & Feronika Sekar Puriningsih & Mutharuddin & Tetty Sulastry Mardiana & Wilmar Jonris Siahaan & Teguh Pairunan & Abdy Kurniawan, 2022. "Cost Efficiency and CO 2 Emission Reduction in Short Sea Shipping: Evidence from Ciwandan Port–Panjang Port Routes, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Boies, Adam M. & McFarlane, Dane & Taff, Steven & Watts, Winthrop F. & Kittelson, David B., 2011. "Implications of local lifecycle analyses and low carbon fuel standard design on gasohol transportation fuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7191-7201.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2235-:d:222514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.