IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p317-d196326.html

Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation of CO 2 –Brine–Rock Interactions during CO 2 Sequestration in a Deep Saline Aquifer

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Liu

    (School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Fangyuan Zhao

    (BMILP Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100054, China)

  • Jinpeng Xu

    (School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yueming Qi

    (School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

CO 2 mineralization is a long-term and secure solution for geological CO 2 storage that primarily depends on the CO 2 –brine–rock interaction during CO 2 sequestration in subsurface formations. In this study, lab experiments were conducted to investigate the CO 2 –brine–rock interaction over short timescales, and numerical simulations were performed to reveal dynamic interactions and equilibrium interactions by applying TOUGHREACT and PHREEQC, respectively. In the experiments, the main ions of HCO 3 − and Ca 2+ were detected in the solution, and calcite dissolution and dawsonite precipitation were observed from SEM images. The simulation results showed that the CO 2 dissolution and the solution pH were affected by the temperatures, pressures, types of solutions, and solution concentrations and were further influenced by mineral dissolution and precipitation. The results of the equilibrium simulation showed that the dissolved minerals were albite, anhydrite, calcite, Ca-montmorillonite, illite, K-feldspar, and chlorite, and the precipitated minerals were dolomite, kaolinite, and quartz, which led to HCO 3 − , K + , and Na + being the main ions in solutions. The results of the dynamic simulation showed that calcite and dolomite dissolved in the early period, while other minerals began to dissolve or precipitate after 100 years. The dissolved minerals were mainly albite, kaolinite, K-feldspar, and chlorite, and precipitated minerals were Ca-montmorillonite, illite, and quartz. Anhydrite and pyrite did not change during the simulation period, and the main ions were HCO 3 − , Na + , Ca 2+ , and Mg 2+ in the simulation period. This study provides an effective approach for analyzing the CO 2 –brine–rock interaction at different stages during CO 2 storage, and the results are helpful for understanding the CO 2 mineralization processes in deep saline aquifers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Liu & Fangyuan Zhao & Jinpeng Xu & Yueming Qi, 2019. "Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation of CO 2 –Brine–Rock Interactions during CO 2 Sequestration in a Deep Saline Aquifer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:317-:d:196326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas F. Stocker & Andreas Schmittner, 1997. "Influence of CO2 emission rates on the stability of the thermohaline circulation," Nature, Nature, vol. 388(6645), pages 862-865, August.
    2. Emberley, S. & Hutcheon, I. & Shevalier, M. & Durocher, K. & Gunter, W.D. & Perkins, E.H., 2004. "Geochemical monitoring of fluid-rock interaction and CO2 storage at the Weyburn CO2-injection enhanced oil recovery site, Saskatchewan, Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1393-1401.
    3. Rathnaweera, T.D. & Ranjith, P.G. & Perera, M.S.A. & Ranathunga, A.S. & Wanniarachchi, W.A.M. & Yang, S.Q. & Lashin, A. & Al Arifi, N., 2017. "An experimental investigation of coupled chemico-mineralogical and mechanical changes in varyingly-cemented sandstones upon CO2 injection in deep saline aquifer environments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 404-414.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liange Zheng & Peter Nico & Nicolas Spycher & Jeremy Domen & Anthony Credoz, 2021. "Potential impacts of CO2 leakage on groundwater quality of overlying aquifer at geological carbon sequestration sites: A review and a proposed assessment procedure," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 1134-1166, October.
    2. Mahmoud, Ali & Gajbhiye, Rahul, 2026. "Cementing technologies for CO2 and hydrogen wells: A critical review of degradation mechanisms, advanced materials, and long-term well integrity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabien Prieur, 2009. "The environmental Kuznets curve in a world of irreversibility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(1), pages 57-90, July.
    2. Megan Ceronsky & David Anthoff & Cameron Hepburn & Richard S.J. Tol, 2005. "Checking The Price Tag On Catastrophe: The Social Cost Of Carbon Under Non-Linear Climate Response," Working Papers FNU-87, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Aug 2005.
    3. Mariia Belaia & Michael Funke & Nicole Glanemann, 2017. "Global Warming and a Potential Tipping Point in the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation: The Role of Risk Aversion," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(1), pages 93-125, May.
    4. Kingwell, Ross S., 2006. "Is Hanrahan sort of right? Will climate change ruin us all?," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 137961, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. T. Bruckner & K. Zickfeld, 2009. "Emissions corridors for reducing the risk of a collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 61-83, January.
    6. Keller, Klaus & Miltich, Louise I. & Robinson, Alexander & Tol, Richard S.J., 2007. "How Overconfident are Current Projections of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Emissions?," Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers 9321, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    7. Zhong, Jinjin & Jiang, Xi, 2017. "A case study of using cosmic ray muons to monitor supercritical CO2 migration in geological formations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1450-1458.
    8. Zhidi Wu & Jason D. Simmons & Samuel Otu & Alex Rinehart & Andrew Luhmann & Jason Heath & Peter Mozley & Bhaskar S. Majumdar, 2023. "Control of Cement Timing, Mineralogy, and Texture on Hydro-chemo-mechanical Coupling from CO 2 Injection into Sandstone: A Synthesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-27, December.
    9. repec:pri:wwseco:dp224 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sreedhar, I. & Vaidhiswaran, R. & Kamani, Bansi. M. & Venugopal, A., 2017. "Process and engineering trends in membrane based carbon capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 659-684.
    11. Kingwell, Ross S., 2006. "Climate change in Australia: agricultural impacts and adaptation," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 14.
    12. Li, Pengliang & Liu, Zhenyi & Li, Mingzhi & Zhao, Yao & Li, Xuan & Wan, Song & Ma, Yuanyuan & He, Yanghua, 2021. "Investigation on the limiting oxygen concentration of combustible gas at high pressures and temperatures during oil recovery process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    13. Naevdal, Eric, 2006. "Dynamic optimisation in the presence of threshold effects when the location of the threshold is uncertain - with an application to a possible disintegration of the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1131-1158, July.
    14. Lempert, Robert J. & Sanstad, Alan H. & Schlesinger, Michael E., 2006. "Multiple equilibria in a stochastic implementation of DICE with abrupt climate change," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(5-6), pages 677-689, November.
    15. Yiman Li & Zhonghe Pang, 2015. "Quantitative assessment of CO 2 storage capacity by using of hydrogeochemical and isotope data for deep saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(5), pages 592-602, October.
    16. Keller, Klaus & Bolker, Benjamin M. & Bradford, D.F.David F., 2004. "Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 723-741, July.
    17. Jim W. Hall & Robert J. Lempert & Klaus Keller & Andrew Hackbarth & Christophe Mijere & David J. McInerney, 2012. "Robust Climate Policies Under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Robust Decision Making and Info‐Gap Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1657-1672, October.
    18. Jie Li & Zhonghe Pang, 2015. "Environmental isotopes in CO 2 geological sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 374-388, August.
    19. Zhou, Xianmin & Wu, Yu-Shu & Chen, Hao & Elsayed, Mahmoud & Yu, Wei & Zhao, Xinrui & Murtaza, Mobeen & Shahzad Kamal, Muhammad & Zafar Khan, Sarmad & Al-Abdrabalnabi, Ridha & Ren, Bo, 2024. "Review of Carbon dioxide utilization and sequestration in depleted oil reservoirs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Brozovic, Nicholas & Schlenker, Wolfram, 2011. "Optimal management of an ecosystem with an unknown threshold," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 627-640, February.
    21. Vafaie, Atefeh & Cama, Jordi & Soler, Josep M. & Kivi, Iman R. & Vilarrasa, Victor, 2023. "Chemo-hydro-mechanical effects of CO2 injection on reservoir and seal rocks: A review on laboratory experiments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:317-:d:196326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.