IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6517-d288582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Public–Private Partnership Scheme in Operation and Maintenance Stage of Railway Project

Author

Listed:
  • Herawati Zetha Rahman

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pancasila University, DKI Jakarta 12640, Indonesia)

  • Perdana Miraj

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pancasila University, DKI Jakarta 12640, Indonesia)

  • Azaria Andreas

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pancasila University, DKI Jakarta 12640, Indonesia)

Abstract

Public–private partnership (PPP) has been extensively used in many sectors worldwide to provide alternative funding for public infrastructure. However, limited evidence found that this scheme was successfully adopted in railway transport particularly in the later stage of the project life cycle. Private participation during operation and maintenance stages are worthy of comprehensive research to cope with recovery of public investment and institutionalization problems. This research aims to analyze the potential of unbundling scenarios based on railway components by taking into account the Light Rail Transit (LRT) project in developing countries as the case study. A life cycle cost evaluation and sensitivity analysis were used to formulate a practical and regulatory framework for the macro-level of decision-making modeling. The findings indicate a possible scenario by considering the passenger demand, ticket price, and government support to generate the best option based on net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). The proposed alternative recommends an attractive investment return for private interest, encourages lower support for government subsidy, and offers a reasonable tariff for the users. The study also suggests future implications from the adoption of research findings which may affect policy formulation and railway industry as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Herawati Zetha Rahman & Perdana Miraj & Azaria Andreas, 2019. "Exploring Public–Private Partnership Scheme in Operation and Maintenance Stage of Railway Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6517-:d:288582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Athena Panayiotou & Francesca Medda, 2014. "Attracting private sector participation in infrastructure investment: the UK case," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 425-431, November.
    2. Elisabetta IOSSA & Stephane SAUSSIER, 2018. "Public Private Partnerships In Europe For Building And Managing Public Infrastructures: An Economic Perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 25-48, March.
    3. Richard Wellings, 2014. "The Privatisation of the UK Railway Industry: An Experiment in Railway Structure," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 255-266, June.
    4. Morisugi, H., 2000. "Evaluation methodologies of transportation projects in Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 35-40, January.
    5. Jozef GNAP & Pavol VARJAN & Pavol ĎURANA & Mariusz KOSTRZEWSKI, 2019. "Research On Relationship Between Freight Transport And Transport Infrastructure In Selected European Countries," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 14(3), pages 63-74, September.
    6. Newman, Peter & Davies-Slate, Sebastian & Jones, Evan, 2018. "The Entrepreneur Rail Model: Funding urban rail through majority private investment in urban regeneration," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 19-28.
    7. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Ping Tserng, H. & Lin, Chieh & Yeh, Chun-Pin, 2012. "Critical factors and risk allocation for PPP policy: Comparison between HSR and general infrastructure projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 36-48.
    8. repec:bla:annpce:v:89:y:2018:i:1:p:25-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Alpkokin, Pelin & Topuz Kiremitci, Sabahat & Black, John Andrew & Cetinavci, Sukru, 2016. "LRT and street tram policies and implementation in turkish cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 476-487.
    10. Oliveira, Matheus & Ribeiro, Joana & Macário, Rosário, 2016. "Are we planning investments to fail? Consequences of traffic forecast effects on PPP contracts: Portuguese and Brazilian cases," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 167-174.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Du & Wenxin Wang & Xinghua Gao & Min Hu & Haili Jiang, 2023. "Sustainable Operations: A Systematic Operational Performance Evaluation Framework for Public–Private Partnership Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Dasari, Rohit & Patidar, Manoj, 2023. "A system dynamics model for effective management strategies of High-Speed Railway (HSR) projects involving private sector participation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Marina Mikhailovna Pukhova & Irina Anatolievna Merkulina & Dmitry Yuryevich Bashkov, 2021. "Developing Public–Private Partnership Projects to Enhance Innovation Capability in the Defence Industry," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naoki FUJIWARA, 2019. "International City Network and Public-Private Cooperation Japanese Public Water Services’ Overseas Expansion," CIRIEC Working Papers 1909, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    2. Bouteska, Ahmed & Sharif, Taimur & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Ghouli-Oueslati, Jihene, 2023. "Relocating investments by Tunisian insurance and pension funds towards alternative assets opportunities," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 609-629.
    3. Polydoropoulou, Amalia & Roumboutsos, Athena, 2009. "Evaluating the impact of decision making during construction on transport project outcome," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 369-380, November.
    4. Yujia He & Lei Shi & Zhongfu Li, 2021. "The combined effect of marginal social and private benefit on the socially optimal equity structure of PPP projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 807-823, October.
    5. Poliak Miloš & Kubáňová Jaroslava & Zhuravleva Natalia Aleksandrovna & Jaśkiewicz Marek & Lakhmetkina Natalia, 2023. "Identification of the Impact of Transport Performance on the Economy of Particular Area," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 192-202, January.
    6. Daniela Paddeu & Paulus Aditjandra, 2020. "Shaping Urban Freight Systems via a Participatory Approach to Inform Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Cundric, A. & Kern, T. & Rajkovic, V., 2008. "A qualitative model for road investment appraisal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 225-231, July.
    8. Weihang Gong & Jing (Victor) Li & Mee Kam Ng, 2021. "Deciphering Property Development around High-Speed Railway Stations through Land Value Capture: Case Studies in Shenzhen and Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Gianni Carbonaro & Eugenio Leanza & Philip McCann & Francesca Medda, 2018. "Demographic Decline, Population Aging, and Modern Financial Approaches to Urban Policy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 210-232, March.
    10. Kuei-Hu Chang & Yung-Chia Chang & Kai Chain & Hsiang-Yu Chung, 2016. "Integrating Soft Set Theory and Fuzzy Linguistic Model to Evaluate the Performance of Training Simulation Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    11. Eda Ustaoglu & Brendan Williams & Laura O. Petrov & Harutyun Shahumyan & Hedwig Van Delden, 2017. "Developing and Assessing Alternative Land-Use Scenarios from the MOLAND Model: A Scenario-Based Impact Analysis Approach for the Evaluation of Rapid Rail Provisions and Urban Development in the Greate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    12. Muhammad Jufri Marzuki & Graeme Newell, 2020. "A global investment opportunity in non-listed infrastructure for institutional investors," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 239-255, May.
    13. Gani Aldashev & Esteban Jaimovich & Thierry Verdier, 2023. "The Dark Side of Transparency: Mission Variety and Industry Equilibrium in Decentralised Public Good Provision," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(654), pages 2085-2109.
    14. Ludmiła Filina-Dawidowicz & Anna Wiktorowska-Jasik, 2022. "Contemporary problems and challenges of sustainable distribution of perishable cargoes: Case study of Polish cold port stores," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4434-4450, March.
    15. Rothengatter, Werner, 2019. "Megaprojects in transportation networks," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-15.
    16. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2019. "Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 87-104.
    17. Jiaxian Shi & Changbin Qi & Xinxin Mu, 2023. "Accelerating the Construction of a Unified Domestic Market to Promote Sustainable Economic Development: Mechanisms, Challenges and Countermeasures—A Perspective Based on the General Law of the Market ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Arias, Juan F. & Bachmann, Chris, 2022. "Quantifying the relative importance of rapid transit implementation barriers: Evidence from ecuador," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Cian O'SHEA & Dónal PALCIC & Eoin REEVES, 2019. "Comparing Ppp With Traditional Procurement: The Case Of Schools Procurement In Ireland," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 245-267, June.
    20. Wu, Yunna & Song, Zixin & Li, Lingwenying & Xu, Ruhang, 2018. "Risk management of public-private partnership charging infrastructure projects in China based on a three-dimension framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 1089-1101.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6517-:d:288582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.