IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v9y2021i4p147-d652797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Public–Private Partnership Projects to Enhance Innovation Capability in the Defence Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Mikhailovna Pukhova

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167 Moscow, Russia)

  • Irina Anatolievna Merkulina

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167 Moscow, Russia)

  • Dmitry Yuryevich Bashkov

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The relevance of this study resides in the need to determine the key measures for a more effective application of the mechanism of public–private partnerships (PPP) in the implementation of large-scale infrastructure projects, aimed at developing the innovation potential of the Russian defence–industrial complex (DIC). Through the analysis of foreign practices of the application of PPP in the defence industry, representing a vast body of scientific and popular literature on the development of the defence industry in the U.S. and the countries of Europe and Asia, as well as a review of the domestic regulatory framework, the authors have identified the most common and key problems that are obstacles to the effective and sustainable development of PPP mechanisms, and their application not only in the civil, but also in the defence sector. This work pays specific attention to the requirements that are imposed on public and private partners in the process of implementing PPP projects in the context of SDO performance, along with the risks that are inevitably associated with the activities of each of the parties. As a result, the authors present a graphical interpretation of the algorithm for financing the state defence order (SDO) and disclose the system of interaction between the elements of a given algorithm, as well as formulating an essential recommendation for the further development of PPP in Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Mikhailovna Pukhova & Irina Anatolievna Merkulina & Dmitry Yuryevich Bashkov, 2021. "Developing Public–Private Partnership Projects to Enhance Innovation Capability in the Defence Industry," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:147-:d:652797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/9/4/147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/9/4/147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga V. Loseva & Svetlana V. Karpova & Konstantin O. Rasteryaev & Elizaveta S. Sokolova & Svetlana V. Makar & Khvicha P. Kharchilava, 2020. "Sustainable Energy in Island States: Comparative Analysis of New Trends in Energy Digitalization and the Experience of the UK, Japan, Indonesia and Cyprus," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 722-731.
    2. Cepparulo, Alessandra & Eusepi, Giuseppe & Giuriato, Luisa, 2020. "Public finances and Public Private Partnerships in the European Union," MPRA Paper 103918, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Abu Naser Chowdhury & Po-Han Chen, 2010. "Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) of Public Private Partnership Projects in Asia and Mediterranean Middle East: Trends and Techniques," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 2(1), pages 64-88, April.
    4. Herawati Zetha Rahman & Perdana Miraj & Azaria Andreas, 2019. "Exploring Public–Private Partnership Scheme in Operation and Maintenance Stage of Railway Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    6. Stefan Verweij & Ingmar van Meerkerk, 2021. "Do public–private partnerships achieve better time and cost performance than regular contracts?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 286-295, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Endah Murtiana Sari & Agustinus Purna Irawan & Mochamad Agung Wibowo & Januar Parlaungan Siregar & Arief Kusuma Among Praja, 2022. "Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark A. Moore & Aidan R. Vining, 2023. "PPP performance evaluation: the social welfare goal, principal–agent theory and political economy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 267-299, June.
    2. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Shashi,, 2019. "Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 172-194.
    4. Janusz Myszczyszyn, 2022. "Public-Private Partnership - Development and Dilemmas for the Future from the Point of View of the Public Partner," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 390-400.
    5. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Cao, Fuguo & Li, Runyu & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Juan Du & Wenxin Wang & Xinghua Gao & Min Hu & Haili Jiang, 2023. "Sustainable Operations: A Systematic Operational Performance Evaluation Framework for Public–Private Partnership Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Wen, Tianzuo & Qiang, Wei & Liu, Xingjian, 2022. "Exploring the geography of urban comprehensive development in mainland Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Katharina Spraul & Julia Thaler, 2020. "Partnering for good? An analysis of how to achieve sustainability-related outcomes in public–private partnerships," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 485-511, July.
    11. Gordon Dugle & Stephen Debar Kpinpuo & Benjamin Baisie Ghartey, 2021. "From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 866-884, May.
    12. Achard, Paola Olimpia & Di Berardino, Antonina, 2018. "Public Private Partnerships: Strategic Assets and Managerial Models," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184925, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Nachemson-Ekwall , Sophie, 2019. "A Swedish market for sustainability-related and socially labelled bonds. Institutional investors as drivers," SSE Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2019:3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    14. Lauri Koskela & John Rooke & Mohan Siriwardena, 2016. "Evaluation of the Promotion of Through-Life Management in Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Haitham Nobanee & Maryam Alhajjar & Ghada Abushairah & Safaa Al Harbi, 2021. "Reputational Risk and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis of Relevant Literature," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Mohammed Khaled Al-Hanawi & Sarh Almubark & Ameerah M N Qattan & Agnieszka Cenkier & Ewa Agnieszka Kosycarz, 2020. "Barriers to the implementation of public-private partnerships in the healthcare sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Surbhi Gupta & Anil Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Evolution of infrastructure as an asset class: a systematic literature review and thematic analysis," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 173-200, May.
    18. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    19. Cristina - Iuliana PETROVAN (MARANDA), 2023. "Public-Private Partnership'S Ascent And Fall In Europe," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 48-58, December.
    20. Hugo J. Fuentes & Gustavo Mendoza & Miguel A. Montoya & Ismael Aguilar, 2021. "Public-private partnerships in Mexico: Challenges and opportunities at local level," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 22(1), pages 35-52, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:147-:d:652797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.