IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6310-d285523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Vlasenko

    () (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Anatolii Hatsko

    () (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana Larina

    () (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Yevhen Hryn

    () (Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskykh St. 44, 61002 Kharkiv City, Ukraine)

  • Dalia Streimikiene

    () (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, A. Vivulskio Str. 4A, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Tomas Balezentis

    () (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, A. Vivulskio Str. 4A, 03220 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Enterprise sustainability can only be ensured by taking into account the dynamics of the environment, which requires effective implementation of changes. Organizational change management is seen as the interaction of the groups of processes: direct implementation and the processes of managerial influence on their implementation. The article seeks to develop a framework for evaluation of change management processes based on the fuzzy logics. The expert analysis was carried out to develop fuzzy rules based on the linguistic terms (high, medium, and low). The database of rules for assigning an enterprise to the appropriate level of organizational change management has been developed (243 rules). The proposed model was applied to the case of Ukrainian agricultural machinery companies. The results allowed identifying the bottlenecks for the companies under analysis in seeking sustainable change management.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6310-:d:285523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6310/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6310/
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Oleinik, 2018. "EOpen Economy or Protectionism: Ukraine’s Dilemma," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(3), pages 109-127.
    2. Kwang O. Park, 2018. "The Relationship between BPR Strategy and Change Management for the Sustainable Implementation of ERP: An Information Orientation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Michal Pohludka & Hana Stverkova & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Fawad Ahmed & Yuan Jian Qin & Luis Martínez, 2019. "Sustainable Change Management through Employee Readiness: Decision Support System Adoption in Technology-Intensive British E-Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, May.
    6. Serhii Kozlovskyi & Hennadii Mazur & Nataliia Vdovenko & Tetiana Shepel & Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, 2018. "Modeling and Forecasting the Level of State Stimulation of Agricultural Production in Ukraine Based on the Theory of Fuzzy Logic," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(3), pages 37-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raul Oltra-Badenes & Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez & Vicente Guerola-Navarro & Pau Vicedo, 2019. "Is It Possible to Manage the Product Recovery Processes in an ERP? Analysis of Functional Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Patricio Ramírez-Correa & Elizabeth E. Grandón & Jorge Alfaro-Pérez & Giselle Painén-Aravena, 2019. "Personality Types as Moderators of the Acceptance of Information Technologies in Organizations: A Multi-Group Analysis in PLS-SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk, 2020. "An Approach to Assessing Sustainability in the Development of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(21), pages 1-1, October.
    4. Petra Horváthová & Marie Mikušová & Kateřina Kashi, 2020. "Comparison of Human Resources Management in Non-Family and Family Businesses: Case Study of the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(14), pages 1-1, July.
    5. Minodora Ursacescu & Dan Popescu & Cristina State & Ion Smeureanu, 2019. "Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Pryshliak Natalia & Tokarchuk Dina, 2020. "Socio-economic and environmental benefits of biofuel production development from agricultural waste in Ukraine," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 18-27, March.
    7. Dana Kiseľáková & Beáta Šofranková & Miroslav Gombár & Veronika Čabinová & Erika Onuferová, 2019. "Competitiveness and Its Impact on Sustainability, Business Environment, and Human Development of EU (28) Countries in terms of Global Multi-Criteria Indices," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Yingnan Yang & Yidan Zhang & Hongming Xie, 2020. "Exploring Cultivation Path of Building Information Modelling in China: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(17), pages 1-1, August.
    9. Anna Irimiás & Ariel Mitev, 2020. "Change Management, Digital Maturity, and Green Development: Are Successful Firms Leveraging on Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(10), pages 1-1, May.
    10. Arthur Jin Lin & Hai-Yen Chang, 2019. "Business Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese Banks—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, April.
    11. Lenka Ližbetinová & Peter Štarchoň & Dagmar Weberová & Eva Nedeliaková & Martina Juříková, 2019. "The Approach of SMEs to Using the Customer Databases and CRM: Empirical Study in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1, December.
    12. Longhui Liao & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Ruidong Chang & Xianbo Zhao, 2020. "Diffusion of Building Information Modeling in Building Projects and Firms in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(18), pages 1-1, September.
    13. Trin Thananusak, 2019. "Science Mapping of the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Entrepreneurship, 1996–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Ermal Hetemi & Joaquin Ordieres-Meré & Cali Nuur, 2020. "An Institutional Approach to Digitalization in Sustainability-Oriented Infrastructure Projects: The Limits of the Building Information Model," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(9), pages 1-1, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    enterprise sustainability; fuzzy logics; change management; Ukraine;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics
    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6310-:d:285523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.