IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5319-d271029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Game Analysis on Knowledge-Sharing Behavior in the Construction Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Chanchan Hao

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Qiang Du

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Center for Green Engineering and Sustainable Development, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Youdan Huang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Long Shao

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yunqing Yan

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

With the increasingly fierce global competition, supply chain members have to collaborate to respond to constant changes. Efficient knowledge sharing is the basis for the collaborative operation of the supply chain. Combined with evolutionary game theory, this paper studies the evolution path and stable strategies of knowledge-sharing behavior between construction supply chain enterprises, analyzing the factors that influence the establishment of a knowledge-sharing alliance. A numerical simulation is conducted to verify theoretical results and the effects of parameter adjustments on behavioral evolution. The results indicate that under different income relationships, knowledge-sharing behavior in construction supply chains presents different evolutionary trajectories. In addition, the probability of accepting the sharing strategy is positively correlated with the penalty coefficient, incentive coefficient, trust level, and synergy coefficient and negatively correlated with cost. This study provides a new perspective and theoretical guidance for establishing stable knowledge collaboration between enterprises and promoting the sustainable development of the construction supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanchan Hao & Qiang Du & Youdan Huang & Long Shao & Yunqing Yan, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Knowledge-Sharing Behavior in the Construction Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5319-:d:271029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malik M.A. Khalfan & Mukesh Kashyap & Xianguang Li & Carl Abbott, 2010. "Knowledge management in construction supply chain integration," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2/3), pages 207-221.
    2. Cai, Gangshu & Kock, Ned, 2009. "An evolutionary game theoretic perspective on e-collaboration: The collaboration effort and media relativeness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 821-833, May.
    3. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    4. Li, Yung-Ming & Jhang-Li, Jhih-Hua, 2010. "Knowledge sharing in communities of practice: A game theoretic analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 1052-1064, December.
    5. Ding, Xiu-Hao & Huang, Rui-Hua, 2010. "Effects of knowledge spillover on inter-organizational resource sharing decision in collaborative knowledge creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 949-959, March.
    6. Hassini, Elkafi & Surti, Chirag & Searcy, Cory, 2012. "A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 69-82.
    7. Yoo, Sang Bong & Kim, Yeongho, 2002. "Web-based knowledge management for sharing product data in virtual enterprises," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1-2), pages 173-183, January.
    8. Mike Bresnen & Nick Marshall, 2000. "Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 229-237.
    9. Verwaal, Ernst & Hesselmans, Maurice, 2004. "Drivers of Supply Network Governance:: An Explorative Study of the Dutch Chemical Industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 442-451, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiabao Jing & Xiaomei Deng & Rashid Maqbool & Yahya Rashid & Saleha Ashfaq, 2020. "Default Behaviors of Contractors under Surety Bond in Construction Industry Based on Evolutionary Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-28, November.
    2. Chuan Zhao & Luyao Li & Hongxia Sun & Hongji Yang, 2021. "Multi-Scenario Evolutionary Game of Rumor-Affected Enterprises under Demand Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Fan Chen & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "Horizontal Coordination of I-LNGOs in the Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Eduardo Alarcon-Gerbier & Zarina Chokparova & Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Wanqi Zhao & Hani Shahmoradi-Moghadam & Uwe Aßmann & Orçun Oruç, 2022. "Software-Defined Mobile Supply Chains: Rebalancing Resilience and Efficiency in Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Rumeng Zhang & Lihong Li, 2023. "Research on Evolutionary Game and Simulation of Information Sharing in Prefabricated Building Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Vidyadhar V. Gedam & Rakesh D. Raut & Nishant Agrawal & Qingyun Zhu, 2023. "Critical human and behavioral factors on the adoption of sustainable supply chain management practices in the context of automobile industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 120-133, January.
    7. Yujia Huo & Jiali Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Yang Xu, 2022. "The Collaboration Mechanism of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Dominated by Farmer Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Alarcon-Gerbier & Zarina Chokparova & Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Wanqi Zhao & Hani Shahmoradi-Moghadam & Uwe Aßmann & Orçun Oruç, 2022. "Software-Defined Mobile Supply Chains: Rebalancing Resilience and Efficiency in Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Liang Ma & Weiqiang Hu & Ru Liang, 2024. "The Impact of the Industrial Internet on the Innovation and Development Level of China’s Manufacturing Industry: Under the Perspective of Government Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Hui Yan & Haixiang Wei & Min Wei, 2021. "Exploring Tourism Recovery in the Post-COVID-19 Period: An Evolutionary Game Theory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Huang, Xingjun & Lin, Yun & Lim, Ming K. & Zhou, Fuli & Ding, Rui & Zhang, Zusheng, 2022. "Evolutionary dynamics of promoting electric vehicle-charging infrastructure based on public–private partnership cooperation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    5. Su, Q. & Zhou, P. & Ding, H. & Xydis, G., 2024. "Transition towards a hybrid energy system: Combined effects of renewable portfolio standards and carbon emission trading," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Hong Zhang & Paul Georgescu, 2022. "Sustainable Organic Farming, Food Safety and Pest Management: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Mengdi Zhang & Wanting Yang & Zhiheng Zhao & Saurabh Pratap & Wei Wu & George Q. Huang, 2023. "Is digital twin a better solution to improve ESG evaluation for vaccine logistics supply chain: an evolutionary game analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1791-1813, December.
    8. Gu, Wei & Wei, Lirong & Zhang, Wenqing & Yan, Xiangbin, 2019. "Evolutionary game analysis of cooperation between natural resource- and energy-intensive companies in reverse logistics operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 159-169.
    9. Qianru Chen & Hualin Xie & Qunli Zhai, 2022. "Management Policy of Farmers’ Cultivated Land Abandonment Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Gu, Tianqi & Xu, Weiping & Liang, Hua & He, Qing & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "School bus transport service strategies’ policy-making mechanism – An evolutionary game approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Zhang, Mengdi & Yang, Wanting & Zhao, Zhiheng & Wang, Shuaian & Huang, George Q., 2024. "Do fairness concerns matter for ESG decision-making? Strategic interactions in digital twin-enabled sustainable semiconductor supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    14. Wang Mingbao & Du Zhiping & Duan Hong, 2017. "Study on Participant Behavior Game of Electronic Products Reverse Supply Chain Based on ECP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(5), pages 411-434, October.
    15. Hongxia Sun & Yao Wan & Huirong Lv, 2020. "System Dynamics Model for the Evolutionary Behaviour of Government Enterprises and Consumers in China’s New Energy Vehicle Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Bergstrom, Theodore C & Stark, Oded, 1993. "How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 149-155, May.
    17. Yinglin Wang & Leqi Chen & Jiaxin Zhuang, 2024. "Research on ESG Investment Efficiency Regulation from the Perspective of Reciprocity and Evolutionary Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1665-1695, September.
    18. Mohsin Malik & Salam Abdallah, 2019. "Sustainability Initiatives in Emerging Economies: A Socio-Cultural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Mengyang Cui & Yuhong Wang, 2025. "Research on New Energy Vehicle Power Battery Recycling Deposit System Based on Evolutionary Game Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5319-:d:271029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.