IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9162-d439780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Default Behaviors of Contractors under Surety Bond in Construction Industry Based on Evolutionary Game Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jiabao Jing

    (Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xiaomei Deng

    (Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Rashid Maqbool

    (Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yahya Rashid

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16273, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saleha Ashfaq

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fujian 350108, China)

Abstract

In construction projects, some contractors will take default actions against the contracts to obtain maximum profits and damage the owners’ benefits as a result. In the construction markets where effective supervision is not performed well, contractors have more opportunities to default. Surety bonds were designed to solve the default problems and promote the sustainable development of the construction markets. This paper was proposed to explore the interactions between owners and contractors and investigate the influence of surety bonds (high penalty and low penalty) on the default behavior of contractors based on a static and dynamic evolutionary game analysis model. The results showed that applying the surety bond strategy is effective at decreasing the probability of the contractors’ default behavior when the credit system based on a surety bond system is well developed in the construction industry and the cost of the surety bond is low enough. Therefore, government strategies such as a better development of the credit system driven by surety bonds and the subsidies on surety bonds to reduce the cost can mitigate the contractors’ default behavior and keep the sustainability of the construction markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiabao Jing & Xiaomei Deng & Rashid Maqbool & Yahya Rashid & Saleha Ashfaq, 2020. "Default Behaviors of Contractors under Surety Bond in Construction Industry Based on Evolutionary Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9162-:d:439780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qianqian Shi & Jianbo Zhu & Qian Li, 2018. "Cooperative Evolutionary Game and Applications in Construction Supplier Tendency," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, January.
    2. Chanchan Hao & Qiang Du & Youdan Huang & Long Shao & Yunqing Yan, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Knowledge-Sharing Behavior in the Construction Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    5. Sudheer Chava & Robert A. Jarrow, 2008. "Bankruptcy Prediction with Industry Effects," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financial Derivatives Pricing Selected Works of Robert Jarrow, chapter 21, pages 517-549, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Bester, Helmut & Guth, Werner, 1998. "Is altruism evolutionarily stable?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 193-209, February.
    7. Dufwenberg, Martin & Guth, Werner, 1999. "Indirect evolution vs. strategic delegation: a comparison of two approaches to explaining economic institutions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 281-295, June.
    8. Yanchao Du & Hengyu Zhou & Yongbo Yuan & Hong Xue, 2019. "Exploring the Moral Hazard Evolutionary Mechanism for BIM Implementation in an Integrated Project Team," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    9. Yujing Yang & Wenzhe Tang & Wenxin Shen & Tengfei Wang, 2019. "Enhancing Risk Management by Partnering in International EPC Projects: Perspective from Evolutionary Game in Chinese Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Fang, Yujuan & Chen, Laijun & Mei, Shengwei & Wei, Wei & Huang, Shaowei & Liu, Feng, 2019. "Coal or electricity? An evolutionary game approach to investigate fuel choices of urban heat supply systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 107-122.
    11. Jianbo Zhu & Miao Fang & Qianqian Shi & Peng Wang & Qian Li, 2018. "Contractor Cooperation Mechanism and Evolution of the Green Supply Chain in Mega Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Long Li & Zhongfu Li & Lei Jiang & Guangdong Wu & Daojin Cheng, 2018. "Enhanced Cooperation among Stakeholders in PPP Mega-Infrastructure Projects: A China Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhicheng Weng & Pinliang Luo, 2021. "Supervision of the Default Risk of Online Car-Hailing Platform from an Evolutionary Game Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Gao & Zhen-Yu Zhao, 2020. "The Evolutionary Game of Stakeholders’ Coordination Mechanism of New Energy Power Construction PPP Project: A China Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Zhao, Dan & Ji, Shou-feng & Wang, He-ping & Jiang, Li-wen, 2021. "How do government subsidies promote new energy vehicle diffusion in the complex network context? A three-stage evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Ji, Shou-feng & Zhao, Dan & Luo, Rong-juan, 2019. "Evolutionary game analysis on local governments and manufacturers' behavioral strategies: Impact of phasing out subsidies for new energy vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Song Yang & Jincai Zhuang & Aifeng Wang & Yancai Zhang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Chinese Food Quality considering Effort Levels," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, November.
    6. Mauricio G. Villena & Marcelo J. Villena, 2004. "Evolutionary Game Theory and Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics: Is EGT Veblenian?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 585-610, September.
    7. M. Vittoria Levati, 2006. "Explaining Private Provision Of Public Goods By Conditional Cooperation: An Indirect Evolutionary Approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 68-92, February.
    8. Lahkar, Ratul, 2019. "Elimination of non-individualistic preferences in large population aggregative games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 150-165.
    9. Alex Possajennikov, 2004. "Two-Speed Evolution of Strategies and Preferences In Symmetric Games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 227-263, November.
    10. Xia, Xiaoning & Li, Pengwei & Cheng, Yang, 2023. "Tripartite evolutionary game analysis of power battery carbon footprint disclosure under the EU battery regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    11. Jamali, Mohammad-Bagher & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza & Khosroshahi, Hossein & Altmann, Jörn, 2022. "An evolutionary game-theoretic approach to study the technological transformation of the industrial sector toward renewable electricity procurement: A case study of Iran," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    12. Xiao, Tiaojun & Chen, Guohua, 2009. "Wholesale pricing and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers with imperfectly observable objective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1190-1201, August.
    13. Yingxia Xue & Fang Liu & Guangbin Wang & Jungang Shao, 2023. "Research on Strategy Evolution of Contractor and Resident in Construction Stage of Old Community Renovation Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Dufwenberg, Martin & Guth, Werner, 2000. "Why do you hate me?: On the survival of spite," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 147-152, May.
    15. John P. Conley & Myrna Wooders, 2005. "Memetics & Voting: How Nature May Make us Public Spirited," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0514, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    16. Heller, Yuval & Mohlin, Erik, 2019. "Coevolution of deception and preferences: Darwin and Nash meet Machiavelli," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 223-247.
    17. John Conley & Myrna H. Wooders & Ali Toossi, 2001. "Evolution & Voting: How Nature Makes us Public Spirited," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 28(24), pages 1.
    18. Fan Chen & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "Horizontal Coordination of I-LNGOs in the Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Hao Chen & Hai-Tao Chen, 2021. "The role of social network sites on the relationship between game users and developers: an evolutionary game analysis of virtual goods," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 67-81, June.
    20. Yujia Huo & Jiali Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Yang Xu, 2022. "The Collaboration Mechanism of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Dominated by Farmer Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9162-:d:439780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.