IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5283-d270710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Model to Predict the Elastic Behavior of Sandstone Rocks

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Gowida

    (College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tamer Moussa

    (College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia)

  • Salaheldin Elkatatny

    (College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulwahab Ali

    (Center of Integrative Petroleum Research, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Rock mechanical properties play a key role in the optimization process of engineering practices in the oil and gas industry so that better field development decisions can be made. Estimation of these properties is central in well placement, drilling programs, and well completion design. The elastic behavior of rocks can be studied by determining two main parameters: Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio. Accurate determination of the Poisson’s ratio helps to estimate the in-situ horizontal stresses and in turn, avoid many critical problems which interrupt drilling operations, such as pipe sticking and wellbore instability issues. Accurate Poisson’s ratio values can be experimentally determined using retrieved core samples under simulated in-situ downhole conditions. However, this technique is time-consuming and economically ineffective, requiring the development of a more effective technique. This study has developed a new generalized model to estimate static Poisson’s ratio values of sandstone rocks using a supervised artificial neural network (ANN). The developed ANN model uses well log data such as bulk density and sonic log as the input parameters to target static Poisson’s ratio values as outputs. Subsequently, the developed ANN model was transformed into a more practical and easier to use white-box mode using an ANN-based empirical equation. Core data (692 data points) and their corresponding petrophysical data were used to train and test the ANN model. The self-adaptive differential evolution ( SADE ) algorithm was used to fine-tune the parameters of the ANN model to obtain the most accurate results in terms of the highest correlation coefficient ( R ) and the lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results obtained from the optimized ANN model show an excellent agreement with the laboratory measured static Poisson’s ratio, confirming the high accuracy of the developed model. A comparison of the developed ANN-based empirical correlation with the previously developed approaches demonstrates the superiority of the developed correlation in predicting static Poisson’s ratio values with the highest R and the lowest MAPE. The developed correlation performs in a manner far superior to other approaches when validated against unseen field data. The developed ANN-based mathematical model can be used as a robust tool to estimate static Poisson’s ratio without the need to run the ANN model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Gowida & Tamer Moussa & Salaheldin Elkatatny & Abdulwahab Ali, 2019. "A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Model to Predict the Elastic Behavior of Sandstone Rocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5283-:d:270710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5283/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5283/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Sungil & Kim, Heeyoung, 2016. "A new metric of absolute percentage error for intermittent demand forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 669-679.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Computing: Methods, Technologies, Systems, Applications and Policy Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-3, March.
    2. Muhammad Nasir Khurshid & Ammad Hassan Khan & Zia ur Rehman & Tahir Sultan Chaudhary, 2022. "The Evaluation of Rock Mass Characteristics against Seepage for Sustainable Infrastructure Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Rozmysław Mieński & Przemysław Urbanek & Irena Wasiak, 2021. "Using Energy Storage Inverters of Prosumer Installations for Voltage Control in Low-Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Xin Wei & Niaz Muhammad Shahani & Xigui Zheng, 2023. "Predictive Modeling of the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks Using an Artificial Neural Network Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Yan Li & Fathin Nur Syakirah Hishamuddin & Ahmed Salih Mohammed & Danial Jahed Armaghani & Dmitrii Vladimirovich Ulrikh & Ali Dehghanbanadaki & Aydin Azizi, 2021. "The Effects of Rock Index Tests on Prediction of Tensile Strength of Granitic Samples: A Neuro-Fuzzy Intelligent System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    2. Vasile Brătian & Ana-Maria Acu & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Emil Dinga & Gabriela-Mariana Ionescu, 2021. "Efficient or Fractal Market Hypothesis? A Stock Indexes Modelling Using Geometric Brownian Motion and Geometric Fractional Brownian Motion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Andrea Petroselli & Jacek Florek & Dariusz Młyński & Leszek Książek & Andrzej Wałęga, 2020. "New Insights on Flood Mapping Procedure: Two Case Studies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Jose Manuel Barrera & Alejandro Reina & Alejandro Maté & Juan Carlos Trujillo, 2020. "Solar Energy Prediction Model Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Open Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Bhatia, Kushagra & Mittal, Rajat & Varanasi, Jyothi & Tripathi, M.M., 2021. "An ensemble approach for electricity price forecasting in markets with renewable energy resources," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Anh Ngoc-Lan Huynh & Ravinesh C. Deo & Duc-Anh An-Vo & Mumtaz Ali & Nawin Raj & Shahab Abdulla, 2020. "Near Real-Time Global Solar Radiation Forecasting at Multiple Time-Step Horizons Using the Long Short-Term Memory Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Indy Man Kit Ho & Anthony Weldon & Jason Tze Ho Yong & Candy Tze Tim Lam & Jaime Sampaio, 2023. "Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Pool Data from Meta-Analysis for the Prediction of Countermovement Jump Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Lee, Joseph C.Y. & Draxl, Caroline & Berg, Larry K., 2022. "Evaluating wind speed and power forecasts for wind energy applications using an open-source and systematic validation framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 457-475.
    9. Gaetano Perone, 2022. "Comparison of ARIMA, ETS, NNAR, TBATS and hybrid models to forecast the second wave of COVID-19 hospitalizations in Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 917-940, August.
    10. Mostofi Fatemeh & Toğan Vedat & Başağa Hasan Basri, 2022. "Real-estate price prediction with deep neural network and principal component analysis," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 2741-2759, January.
    11. Dariusz Młyński, 2020. "Analysis of Problems Related to the Calculation of Flood Frequency Using Rainfall-Runoff Models: A Case Study in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Dalton Garcia Borges de Souza & Erivelton Antonio dos Santos & Francisco Tarcísio Alves Júnior & Mariá Cristina Vasconcelos Nascimento, 2021. "On Comparing Cross-Validated Forecasting Models with a Novel Fuzzy-TOPSIS Metric: A COVID-19 Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Jennifer L. Castle & Jurgen A. Doornik & David F. Hendry, 2021. "Forecasting Principles from Experience with Forecasting Competitions," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, February.
    14. Montero-Sousa, Juan Aurelio & Aláiz-Moretón, Héctor & Quintián, Héctor & González-Ayuso, Tomás & Novais, Paulo & Calvo-Rolle, José Luis, 2020. "Hydrogen consumption prediction of a fuel cell based system with a hybrid intelligent approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Tianxiang Zheng & Shaopeng Liu & Zini Chen & Yuhan Qiao & Rob Law, 2020. "Forecasting Daily Room Rates on the Basis of an LSTM Model in Difficult Times of Hong Kong: Evidence from Online Distribution Channels on the Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Sojin Park & Nahyun Kwon & Yonghan Ahn, 2019. "Forecasting Repair Schedule for Building Components Based on Case-Based Reasoning and Fuzzy-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Stuart J. Fairclough & Danielle L. Christian & Pedro F. Saint-Maurice & Paul R. Hibbing & Robert J. Noonan & Greg J. Welk & Philip M. Dixon & Lynne M. Boddy, 2019. "Calibration and Validation of the Youth Activity Profile as a Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Surveillance Tool for English Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Lydia Simon & Jost Adler, 2022. "Worth the effort? Comparison of different MCMC algorithms for estimating the Pareto/NBD model," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 707-733, May.
    19. George P. Papaioannou & Christos Dikaiakos & Anargyros Dramountanis & Panagiotis G. Papaioannou, 2016. "Analysis and Modeling for Short- to Medium-Term Load Forecasting Using a Hybrid Manifold Learning Principal Component Model and Comparison with Classical Statistical Models (SARIMAX, Exponential Smoot," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-40, August.
    20. Ioannis Badounas & Georgios Pitselis, 2020. "Loss Reserving Estimation With Correlated Run-Off Triangles in a Quantile Longitudinal Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5283-:d:270710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.