IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4675-d261635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Contribution of the Participatory Guarantee System in the Revival of Agroecological Principles in Southern Minas Gerais, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Aloísia Rodrigues Hirata

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-875, Brazil
    Federal Institute of South Minas, Inconfidentes, MG 37576-000, Brazil)

  • Luiz Carlos Dias Rocha

    (Federal Institute of South Minas, Inconfidentes, MG 37576-000, Brazil)

  • Thiago Rodrigo de Paula Assis

    (Management and Economics Department, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil)

  • Vanilde Ferreira de Souza-Esquerdo

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-875, Brazil)

  • Sonia Maria Pessoa Pereira Bergamasco

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-875, Brazil)

Abstract

Market pressures generated by the demand for organic food have pushed farmers to turn away from agroecological principles, which leads to actions focused directly on the agricultural practices for production. The objective of this study was to analyze whether the methodology used by the Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) contributes to farmers’ appropriation of agroecological principles, understood here in their environmental, sociocultural, economic, and political dimensions. We analyzed the PGS-Sul de Minas, which was the first PGS founded in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil and includes 14 organizations and more than 200 families. Documentary analysis and participant observation were prioritized in data collection. The main results are the correlation between the practices used by the farmers in these organizations with the principles of agroecology. This is evident in aspects such as the encouragement of productive diversification, the construction of new marketing alternatives, the revival and use of heirloom seeds, the stimulation of women’s leadership, and places and policies that support and strengthen agroecology. The study found that the procedures adopted by the PGSs help strengthen agroecology and bring direct benefits to the farmers through revival and encouragement of agroecological principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Aloísia Rodrigues Hirata & Luiz Carlos Dias Rocha & Thiago Rodrigo de Paula Assis & Vanilde Ferreira de Souza-Esquerdo & Sonia Maria Pessoa Pereira Bergamasco, 2019. "The Contribution of the Participatory Guarantee System in the Revival of Agroecological Principles in Southern Minas Gerais, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4675-:d:261635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4675/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4675/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oscar José Rover & Bernardo Corrado De Gennaro & Luigi Roselli, 2016. "Social Innovation and Sustainable Rural Development: The Case of a Brazilian Agroecology Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Giovanna Sacchi & Vincenzina Caputo & Rodolfo M. Nayga, 2015. "Alternative Labeling Programs and Purchasing Behavior toward Organic Foods: The Case of the Participatory Guarantee Systems in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biancamaria Torquati & Sergio Pedini & Fabio Maria Santucci & Riccardo Da Re, 2021. "Participatory Guarantee System and Social Capital for Sustainable Development in Brazil: The Case Study of OPAC Orgânicos Sul de Minas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Machuca Henao, José Yeisson & Ávila Guerrero, Flor Marlen, 2022. "Sistemas de garantía participativos como estrategias de desarrollo para productores rurales," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(2), pages 246-272, July.
    3. April M. Roggio & Jason R. Evans, 2022. "Will Participatory Guarantee Systems Happen Here? The Case for Innovative Food Systems Governance in the Developed World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Sonja Kaufmann & Nikolaus Hruschka & Christian R. Vogl, 2020. "Bridging the Literature Gap: A Framework for Assessing Actor Participation in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charalampia N. Anastasiou & Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou & Nikos Kalogeras & Maria I. Tsagkaraki & Ioanna Kalatzi & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2017. "Can the “Euro-Leaf” Logo Affect Consumers’ Willingness-To-Buy and Willingness-To-Pay for Organic Food and Attract Consumers’ Preferences? An Empirical Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Marta López Cifuentes & Christian Reinhard Vogl & Mamen Cuéllar Padilla, 2018. "Participatory Guarantee Systems in Spain: Motivations, Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement Based on Three Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Biancamaria Torquati & Sergio Pedini & Fabio Maria Santucci & Riccardo Da Re, 2021. "Participatory Guarantee System and Social Capital for Sustainable Development in Brazil: The Case Study of OPAC Orgânicos Sul de Minas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Leomara Battisti Telles & Luciano Medina Macedo & Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt, 2017. "Brazilian Solidarity Economy Rural Organizations: Validating Performance Evaluation Criteria Based on Decision Makers’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Oscar José Rover & Bernardo Corrado De Gennaro & Luigi Roselli, 2016. "Social Innovation and Sustainable Rural Development: The Case of a Brazilian Agroecology Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Enrique Bernal Jurado & Adoración Mozas Moral & Domingo Fernández Uclés & Miguel Jesús Medina Viruel, 2017. "Determining Factors for Economic Efficiency in the Organic Olive Oil Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-9, May.
    9. Solfanelli, Francesco & Ozturk, Emel & Pugliese, Patrizia & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2021. "Potential outcomes and impacts of organic group certification in Italy: An evaluative case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Lemeilleur, Sylvaine & Allaire, Gilles, 2019. "Participatory Guarantee Systems for organic farming: reclaiming the commons," Working Papers MOISA 292325, Institut National de la recherché Agronomique (INRA), UMR MOISA : Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs : CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
    11. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2023. "How to boost the local trade of participatory guarantee system (PGS)-certified produce? A value chain perspective in Huánuco, Peru," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    12. Sonja Kaufmann & Nikolaus Hruschka & Luis Vildozo & Christian R. Vogl, 2023. "Alternative Food Networks in Latin America—exploring PGS (Participatory Guarantee Systems) markets and their consumers: a cross-country comparison," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 193-216, March.
    13. Walid Mukahhal & Gumataw Kifle Abebe & Rachel A. Bahn, 2022. "Opportunities and Challenges for Lebanese Horticultural Producers Linked to Corporate Buyers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Kenichiro Onitsuka, 2019. "How Social Media Can Foster Social Innovation in Disadvantaged Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Mamen Cuéllar-Padilla & Isabel Haro-Pérez & Mirene Begiristain-Zubillaga, 2022. "Participatory Guarantee Systems: When People Want to Take Part," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Kuklytė Jūratė & Vveinhardt Jolita, 2017. "Maximization of Created Social Value: Social Business Models and Their Application Tendencies in Lithuania," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 57-79, June.
    17. Mirka Erler & Christoph Dittrich, 2020. "Middle Class, Tradition and the Desi-Realm—Discourses of Alternative Food Networks in Bengaluru, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Tommaso Fantechi & Caterina Contini & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2022. "Consumer preferences for wild game meat: evidence from a hybrid choice model on wild boar meat in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Machuca Henao, José Yeisson & Ávila Guerrero, Flor Marlen, 2022. "Sistemas de garantía participativos como estrategias de desarrollo para productores rurales," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(2), pages 246-272, July.
    20. Nathalie Binder & Christian Reinhard Vogl, 2018. "Participatory Guarantee Systems in Peru: Two Case Studies in Lima and Apurímac and the Role of Capacity Building in the Food Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4675-:d:261635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.