IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p945-d100444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brazilian Solidarity Economy Rural Organizations: Validating Performance Evaluation Criteria Based on Decision Makers’ Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Leomara Battisti Telles

    (Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Technology of Paraná (UTFPR), Av. Monteiro Lobato, Km 04, Ponta Grossa, Paraná 84016-210, Brazil
    Administration Course Department, Federal Institute of Paraná (IFPR), Rodovia PR 562, s/n - Flor da Serra, Coronel Vivida, Paraná 85550-000, Brazil)

  • Luciano Medina Macedo

    (Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Technology of Paraná (UTFPR), Av. Monteiro Lobato, Km 04, Ponta Grossa, Paraná 84016-210, Brazil)

  • Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt

    (Post-Graduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Technology of Paraná (UTFPR), Av. Monteiro Lobato, Km 04, Ponta Grossa, Paraná 84016-210, Brazil)

Abstract

The majority of the world’s current economic models are destructive and unsustainable. Little progress has been made in recent years to change this, despite significant discussion surrounding the theme. In this context, the solidarity economy presents itself as an alternative that seeks environmental and economic sustainability, as well as social promotion. In Brazil, Solidarity Economy Rural Organizations (SEROs) began in the 1970s. As with organizations from other sectors, they should be evaluated in relation to their ability to achieve social and solidarity objectives. Thus, this study aims to present a theoretical model of performance evaluation indicators for Solidarity Economy Rural Organizations in Southern Brazil based on the perceptions of the organizations’ decision makers. SERO representatives interviewed were asked to rank 36 criteria commonly used in performance evaluations, which were grouped into six dimensions: (1) legal documents and standards; (2) valuing of human work; (3) technology and economy; (4) acknowledgment of women; (5) preservation of and respect for nature; and (6) cooperation and solidarity. The results show that SERO representatives consider that performance evaluations should adhere to the Brazilian Declaration of Solidarity Economy Principles. Additionally, we identified a greater concern with criteria correlated to technical and legal aspects than criteria related to solidarity and humanitarianism. These results are relevant for the maintenance of rural solidarity economy organization as they provide a base for developing processes and tools to be used in SERO performance evaluations; such processes are necessary to maintain sustainable development in low-income economies, and to enable solidarity organizations to reach their objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Leomara Battisti Telles & Luciano Medina Macedo & Juliana Vitória Messias Bittencourt, 2017. "Brazilian Solidarity Economy Rural Organizations: Validating Performance Evaluation Criteria Based on Decision Makers’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:945-:d:100444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muchiri, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Gelders, Ludo & Martin, Harry, 2011. "Development of maintenance function performance measurement framework and indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 295-302, May.
    2. Liviu Florea & Yu Cheung & Neil Herndon, 2013. "For All Good Reasons: Role of Values in Organizational Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 393-408, May.
    3. Oscar José Rover & Bernardo Corrado De Gennaro & Luigi Roselli, 2016. "Social Innovation and Sustainable Rural Development: The Case of a Brazilian Agroecology Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Ionel Jianu & Carmen Ţurlea & Ionela Guşatu, 2015. "The Reporting and Sustainable Business Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Marco BELLUCCI & Luca BAGNOLI & Mario BIGGERI & Vittorio RINALDI, 2012. "Performance Measurement In Solidarity Economy Organizations: The Case Of Fair Trade Shops In Italy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(1), pages 25-59, March.
    6. Gaetano Martino & Giulia Giacchè & Enrica Rossetti, 2016. "Organizing the Co-Production of Health and Environmental Values in Food Production: The Constitutional Processes in the Relationships between Italian Solidarity Purchasing Groups and Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Dorothea Greiling, 2010. "Balanced scorecard implementation in German non‐profit organisations," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 534-554, July.
    8. David Barkin & Blanca Lemus, 2014. "Rethinking the Social and Solidarity Society in Light of Community Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Christopher J. Koroneos & Dimitri Rokos, 2012. "Sustainable and Integrated Development—A Critical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Giovanna Sacchi & Vincenzina Caputo & Rodolfo M. Nayga, 2015. "Alternative Labeling Programs and Purchasing Behavior toward Organic Foods: The Case of the Participatory Guarantee Systems in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta López Cifuentes & Christian Reinhard Vogl & Mamen Cuéllar Padilla, 2018. "Participatory Guarantee Systems in Spain: Motivations, Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement Based on Three Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Aloísia Rodrigues Hirata & Luiz Carlos Dias Rocha & Thiago Rodrigo de Paula Assis & Vanilde Ferreira de Souza-Esquerdo & Sonia Maria Pessoa Pereira Bergamasco, 2019. "The Contribution of the Participatory Guarantee System in the Revival of Agroecological Principles in Southern Minas Gerais, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Charalampia N. Anastasiou & Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou & Nikos Kalogeras & Maria I. Tsagkaraki & Ioanna Kalatzi & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2017. "Can the “Euro-Leaf” Logo Affect Consumers’ Willingness-To-Buy and Willingness-To-Pay for Organic Food and Attract Consumers’ Preferences? An Empirical Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Biancamaria Torquati & Sergio Pedini & Fabio Maria Santucci & Riccardo Da Re, 2021. "Participatory Guarantee System and Social Capital for Sustainable Development in Brazil: The Case Study of OPAC Orgânicos Sul de Minas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Patrick Zschech & Kai Heinrich & Raphael Bink & Janis S. Neufeld, 2019. "Prognostic Model Development with Missing Labels," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(3), pages 327-343, June.
    6. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.
    7. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Louis W. Fry & Mai Chi Vu, 2024. "Leading Without a Self: Implications of Buddhist Practices for Pseudo-spiritual Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 41-57, February.
    9. Johannes Freiesleben & Nicolas Gu'erin, 2015. "Homogenization and Clustering as a Non-Statistical Methodology to Assess Multi-Parametrical Chain Problems," Papers 1505.03874, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    10. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Anselm Schneider, 2015. "Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 525-536, March.
    12. Jakov Batelić & Karlo Griparić & Dario Matika, 2021. "Impact of Remediation-Based Maintenance on the Reliability of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Using Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Donghui Lv & Ruru Wang & Yu Zhang, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment Based on Integrating EKC with Decoupling: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    15. M. Guerci & Giovanni Radaelli & Elena Siletti & Stefano Cirella & A. Rami Shani, 2015. "The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices and Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Ethical Climates: An Employee Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 325-342, January.
    16. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    17. André, Kévin & Cho, Charles H. & Laine, Matias, 2018. "Reference points for measuring social performance: Case study of a social business venture," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 660-678.
    18. Enrique Bernal Jurado & Adoración Mozas Moral & Domingo Fernández Uclés & Miguel Jesús Medina Viruel, 2017. "Determining Factors for Economic Efficiency in the Organic Olive Oil Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-9, May.
    19. Rawan Mazen Abukhait & Shaker Bani-Melhem & Rachid Zeffane, 2019. "Empowerment, Knowledge Sharing And Innovative Behaviours: Exploring Gender Differences," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Hosung Son & Joosung Lee & Yanghon Chung, 2017. "Value Creation Mechanism of Social Enterprises in Manufacturing Industry: Empirical Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:945-:d:100444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.