IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p1870-d150589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Quantitative Method for Prediction of Environmental Aspects in Construction Sites of Residential Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Claudio A. Borja

    (Postgraduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Aristides Novis, 02, Federação, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil
    Federal Institute of Bahia (IFBA), BR 324-km 102.11, S/N-Aviário, Feira de Santana 44135-000, Brazil)

  • Sandro Fábio César

    (Post-Graduate Program in Civil Engineering (PPEC), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Aristides Novis, 02, Federação, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

  • Rita Dione A. Cunha

    (Post-Graduate Program in Civil Engineering (PPEC), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Aristides Novis, 02, Federação, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

  • Asher Kiperstok

    (Postgraduate Program in Industrial Engineering (PEI), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Aristides Novis, 02, Federação, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

Abstract

Despite the sectoral initiatives, the construction industry faces difficulties in incorporating effective environmental impact control systems in construction sites. Most of the instruments have been adopting a qualitative approach to environmental issues, with few cases of a quantitative approach. This article introduces a quantitative method for predicting environmental aspects and impacts during the construction of residential buildings, through the integration between environmental indicators and construction cost bases. The methodology was based on the analysis of the relationships among activities, aspects and environmental impacts considered in EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) for the development of the method and its mathematical representation. A case study was carried out to evaluate the method using the bill of quantities (BOQ) from two residential construction sites to measure their environmental aspects. The results suggest the usefulness of the method in the decision-making process on the allocation of control systems and, in some cases, recommending the execution of off-site services to reduce the impacts on the site’s neighborhood. Additionally, the method proved to be easy to apply to evaluate construction sites, as well as flexible to incorporate other activities, adapting to the demand of builders and municipalities to reduce the environmental impacts of construction sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Claudio A. Borja & Sandro Fábio César & Rita Dione A. Cunha & Asher Kiperstok, 2018. "A Quantitative Method for Prediction of Environmental Aspects in Construction Sites of Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-38, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1870-:d:150589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1870/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1870/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ness, Barry & Urbel-Piirsalu, Evelin & Anderberg, Stefan & Olsson, Lennart, 2007. "Categorising tools for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 498-508, January.
    2. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp & Mark D. Partridge, 2013. "The New Urban World," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 285-290, March.
    3. Nuria Calvo & Laura Varela-Candamio & Isabel Novo-Corti, 2014. "A Dynamic Model for Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Management in Spain: Driving Policies Based on Economic Incentives and Tax Penalties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Liang Wong, Ing & Krüger, Eduardo, 2017. "Comparing energy efficiency labelling systems in the EU and Brazil: Implications, challenges, barriers and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 310-323.
    5. Antonio Ángel Rodríguez Serrano & Santiago Porras Álvarez, 2016. "Life Cycle Assessment in Building: A Case Study on the Energy and Emissions Impact Related to the Choice of Housing Typologies and Construction Process in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Ingrid P. S. Araújo & Dayana B. Costa & Rita J. B. De Moraes, 2014. "Identification and Characterization of Particulate Matter Concentrations at Construction Jobsites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adolpho Guido de Araújo & Arnaldo Manoel Pereira Carneiro & Rachel Perez Palha, 2020. "Predictive Methodology for the Quantification of Environmental Aspects in Urban Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Luis Claudio A. Borja & Sandro Fábio César & Rita Dione A. Cunha & Asher Kiperstok, 2019. "Getting Environmental Information from Construction Cost Databases: Applications in Brazilian Courses and Environmental Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Ionel-Sorinel Vasilca & Madlena Nen & Oana Chivu & Valentin Radu & Cezar-Petre Simion & Nicolae Marinescu, 2021. "The Management of Environmental Resources in the Construction Sector: An Empirical Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Claudio A. Borja & Sandro Fábio César & Rita Dione A. Cunha & Asher Kiperstok, 2019. "Getting Environmental Information from Construction Cost Databases: Applications in Brazilian Courses and Environmental Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Rubio Rodríguez, M.A. & Ruyck, J. De & Díaz, P. Roque & Verma, V.K. & Bram, S., 2011. "An LCA based indicator for evaluation of alternative energy routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 630-635, March.
    3. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    4. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    5. Mostafa Shaaban & Jürgen Scheffran & Jürgen Böhner & Mohamed S. Elsobki, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Ngoc-Ninh Ho & Truong Lam Do & Dinh-Thao Tran & Trung Thanh Nguyen, 2022. "Indigenous pig production and welfare of ultra-poor ethnic minority households in the Northern mountains of Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 156-179, January.
    7. Schilling, Markus & Chiang, Lichun, 2011. "The effect of natural resources on a sustainable development policy: The approach of non-sustainable externalities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 990-998, February.
    8. Alexandra Doernberg & Annette Piorr & Ingo Zasada & Dirk Wascher & Ulrich Schmutz, 2022. "Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 885-904, September.
    9. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Creative Buzz Districts In Smart Cities: Urban Retro-Fitting And Urban Forward-Fitting Plans," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 37-57, DECEMBER.
    11. Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Danning Zhang, 2018. "Sustainability Evaluation of Cities in Northeastern China Using Dynamic TOPSIS-Entropy Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Francisco Sanhueza-Durán & José M. Gómez-Soberón & Claudia Valderrama-Ulloa & Felipe Ossio, 2019. "A Comparison of Energy Efficiency Certification in Housing: A Study of the Chilean and Spanish Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Carlo Carraro & Lorenza Campagnolo & Fabio Eboli & Elisa Lanzi & Ramiro Parrado & Elisa Portale, 2012. "Quantifying Sustainability: A New Approach and World Ranking," Working Papers 2012.94, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    14. Frame, Bob & Brown, Judy, 2008. "Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 225-241, April.
    15. Badir S. Alsaeed & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Soroosh Sharifi, 2024. "A Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Framework (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions—Part 1: Developing the Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-43, March.
    16. Castellani, V. & Sala, S., 2010. "Sustainable performance index for tourism policy development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 871-880.
    17. Jean Hugé & Nibedita Mukherjee & Camille Fertel & Jean-Philippe Waaub & Thomas Block & Tom Waas & Nico Koedam & Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, 2015. "Conceptualizing the Effectiveness of Sustainability Assessment in Development Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Abdul Shaban & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2020. "India’s Urban System: Sustainability and Imbalanced Growth of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Anna Furberg & Rickard Arvidsson & Sverker Molander, 2022. "A practice‐based framework for defining functional units in comparative life cycle assessments of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 718-730, June.
    20. Hubeau, Marianne & Marchand, Fleur & Coteur, Ine & Mondelaers, Koen & Debruyne, Lies & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2017. "A new agri-food systems sustainability approach to identify shared transformation pathways towards sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 52-63.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1870-:d:150589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.