IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4683-d189161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coupling Field Observations and Geographical Information System (GIS)-Based Analysis for Improved Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Tone M. Muthanna

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Edvard Sivertsen

    (SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, 7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Dennis Kliewer

    (SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, 7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Lensa Jotta

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Urbanization and increased precipitation volumes and intensities due to climate change add pressure to the urban drainage system, resulting in increased flooding frequencies of urban areas and deteriorating water quality in receiving waters. Infiltration practices and the use of blue green infrastructure, also called Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS), can limit, and, in some cases, reverse the effects of urbanization. However, adequate infiltration capacity is an essential parameter for the successful implementation. In this paper, a Geographical Information System (GIS)-based hydrology analysis for SUDS placements is coupled with field measurements using Modified Phillip Dunne infiltrometer tests. The case study area is the expansion of the campus at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) over the next decade. Infiltration in urban soils can be highly heterogenous over short distances. When comparing measured infiltration rates with physical characteristics of the soils showed that the physical characteristics are not a good indication of the infiltration potential in urban soils with a large degree of compaction. The results showed that measuring the infiltration potential combined with flow path analysis can greatly enhance the benefits of blue green infrastructure, with an up to 70% difference in area required for SUDS solutions for managing 90% of the annual precipitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tone M. Muthanna & Edvard Sivertsen & Dennis Kliewer & Lensa Jotta, 2018. "Coupling Field Observations and Geographical Information System (GIS)-Based Analysis for Improved Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4683-:d:189161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4683/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4683/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saadatian, Omidreza & Sopian, K. & Salleh, E. & Lim, C.H. & Riffat, Safa & Saadatian, Elham & Toudeshki, Arash & Sulaiman, M.Y., 2013. "A review of energy aspects of green roofs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 155-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xintong Wang & Weimin Yang & Zhenhao Xu & Jie Hu & Yiguo Xue & Peng Lin, 2019. "A Normal Cloud Model-Based Method for Water Quality Assessment of Springs and Its Application in Jinan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Bridget Thodesen & Berit Time & Tore Kvande, 2022. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems: Themes of Public Perception—A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Giulio Senes & Paolo Stefano Ferrario & Gianpaolo Cirone & Natalia Fumagalli & Paolo Frattini & Giovanna Sacchi & Giorgio Valè, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions for Storm Water Management—Creation of a Green Infrastructure Suitability Map as a Tool for Land-Use Planning at the Municipal Level in the Province of Monza-Brianza (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Guang Yang & Sara Chao & Jin Yeu Tsou & Yuanzhi Zhang, 2019. "Satellite Image-Based Methods of Spatiotemporal Analysis on Sustainable Urban Land Use Change and the Driving Factors: A Case Study in Caofeidian and the Suburbs, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Cristina Allende-Prieto & Jorge Roces-García & Luis Ángel Sañudo-Fontaneda, 2024. "The High-Resolution Calibration of the Topographic Wetness Index Using PAZ Satellite Radar Data to Determine the Optimal Positions for the Placement of Smart Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) in Urb," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Mariusz Starzec & Józef Dziopak, 2020. "A Case Study of the Retention Efficiency of a Traditional and Innovative Drainage System," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihalakakou, Giouli & Souliotis, Manolis & Papadaki, Maria & Menounou, Penelope & Dimopoulos, Panayotis & Kolokotsa, Dionysia & Paravantis, John A. & Tsangrassoulis, Aris & Panaras, Giorgos & Giannako, 2023. "Green roofs as a nature-based solution for improving urban sustainability: Progress and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Vera, Sergio & Pinto, Camilo & Tabares-Velasco, Paulo Cesar & Bustamante, Waldo, 2018. "A critical review of heat and mass transfer in vegetative roof models used in building energy and urban enviroment simulation tools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 752-764.
    3. Nicole E. Statler & Amanda M. Adams & Ted C. Eckmann, 2017. "Optimizing angles of rooftop photovoltaics, ratios of solar to vegetated roof systems, and economic benefits, in Portland, Oregon, USA," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 320-331, September.
    4. Berardi, Umberto & GhaffarianHoseini, AmirHosein & GhaffarianHoseini, Ali, 2014. "State-of-the-art analysis of the environmental benefits of green roofs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-428.
    5. Manso, Maria & Teotónio, Inês & Silva, Cristina Matos & Cruz, Carlos Oliveira, 2021. "Green roof and green wall benefits and costs: A review of the quantitative evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Coma, Julià & Pérez, Gabriel & Solé, Cristian & Castell, Albert & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2016. "Thermal assessment of extensive green roofs as passive tool for energy savings in buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1106-1115.
    7. Ángel Pitarch & María José Ruá & Lucía Reig & Inés Arín, 2020. "Contribution of Roof Refurbishment to Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Stefano Cascone, 2019. "Green Roof Design: State of the Art on Technology and Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Jomehzadeh, Fatemeh & Nejat, Payam & Calautit, John Kaiser & Yusof, Mohd Badruddin Mohd & Zaki, Sheikh Ahmad & Hughes, Ben Richard & Yazid, Muhammad Noor Afiq Witri Muhammad, 2017. "A review on windcatcher for passive cooling and natural ventilation in buildings, Part 1: Indoor air quality and thermal comfort assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 736-756.
    10. Rafael Suárez & Rocío Escandón & Ramón López-Pérez & Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez & Tillmann Klein & Sacha Silvester, 2018. "Impact of Climate Change: Environmental Assessment of Passive Solutions in a Single-Family Home in Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Marvuglia, Antonino & Koppelaar, Rembrandt & Rugani, Benedetto, 2020. "The effect of green roofs on the reduction of mortality due to heatwaves: Results from the application of a spatial microsimulation model to four European cities," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    12. Uthpala Rathnayake & Denvid Lau & Cheuk Lun Chow, 2020. "Review on Energy and Fire Performance of Water Wall Systems as a Green Building Façade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    13. Shafique, Muhammad & Kim, Reeho & Rafiq, Muhammad, 2018. "Green roof benefits, opportunities and challenges – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 757-773.
    14. Hussain H. Al-Kayiem & Kelly Koh & Tri W. B. Riyadi & Marwan Effendy, 2020. "A Comparative Review on Greenery Ecosystems and Their Impacts on Sustainability of Building Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Coelho, Vitor N. & Weiss Cohen, Miri & Coelho, Igor M. & Liu, Nian & Guimarães, Frederico Gadelha, 2017. "Multi-agent systems applied for energy systems integration: State-of-the-art applications and trends in microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 820-832.
    16. Liu Tian & Yongcai Li & Jun Lu & Jue Wang, 2021. "Review on Urban Heat Island in China: Methods, Its Impact on Buildings Energy Demand and Mitigation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    17. Manso, Maria & Castro-Gomes, João, 2015. "Green wall systems: A review of their characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 863-871.
    18. Chenghao Wang & Jiyun Song & Dachuan Shi & Janet L. Reyna & Henry Horsey & Sarah Feron & Yuyu Zhou & Zutao Ouyang & Ying Li & Robert B. Jackson, 2023. "Impacts of climate change, population growth, and power sector decarbonization on urban building energy use," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Hashemi, Sajedeh Sadat Ghazizadeh & Mahmud, Hilmi Bin & Ashraf, Muhammad Aqeel, 2015. "Performance of green roofs with respect to water quality and reduction of energy consumption in tropics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 669-679.
    20. Ummartyotin, Sarute & Manuspiya, Hathaikarn, 2015. "A critical review on cellulose: From fundamental to an approach on sensor technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 402-412.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4683-:d:189161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.