IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v6y2015i1p1-d61259.html

Linking Changes in Contraceptive Use to Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Manlove

    (Reproductive Health & Family Formation, Child Trends, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA)

  • Quentin Karpilow

    (Reproductive Health & Family Formation, Child Trends, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA)

  • Kate Welti

    (Reproductive Health & Family Formation, Child Trends, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA)

  • Adam Thomas

    (Reproductive Health & Family Formation, Child Trends, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
    McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA)

Abstract

Using a unique microsimulation tool, Teen FamilyScape, the present study explores how changes in the mix of contraceptive methods used by teens contributed to the decline in the U.S. teen pregnancy rate between 2002 and 2010. Results indicate that changes in contraceptive use contributed to approximately half of the decline in the teen pregnancy rate during this time period (48%) and that a little more than half of this “contraceptive effect” was due to an increase in teen condom use (58%). The remaining share of the contraceptive effect can be attributed to an increase in the use of more effective hormonal (pill, patch, ring) and long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC)/injectable methods (Intrauterine Devices (IUD), implant and injectable). Results from an additional counterfactual analysis suggest that the contraceptive effect was driven by the fact that the percentage of teens using no birth control fell during the study time period, rather than by the fact that some teens switched from less effective methods (condoms) to more effective hormonal and LARC/injectable methods. However, very high typical use failure rates for teen condom users suggest the need for a two-pronged approach for continuing reductions in teen pregnancy for sexually active teens: first, targeting the youth most at risk of not using contraception and helping them choose contraception, and second, increasing the effectiveness of method use among existing contraceptors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Manlove & Quentin Karpilow & Kate Welti & Adam Thomas, 2015. "Linking Changes in Contraceptive Use to Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:1-:d:61259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/6/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santelli, J.S. & Lindberg, L.D. & Finer, L.B. & Singh, S., 2007. "Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: The contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(1), pages 150-156.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:8056 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Brian Goesling & Silvie Colman & Christopher Trenholm & Mary Terzian & Kristin Moore, "undated". "Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy, Sexually Transmitted Infections, and Associated Sexual Risk Behaviors: A Systematic Review," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 79abd8a5ae924d15a82e0ee44, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Krystale Littlejohn, 2012. "Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Discontinuation Because of Dissatisfaction: Differences by Race and Education," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(4), pages 1433-1452, November.
    5. Melissa Schettini Kearney & Phillip B. Levine, 2012. "Explaining Recent Trends in the U.S. Teen Birth Rate," NBER Working Papers 17964, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Furstenberg, 2016. "Reconsidering Teenage Pregnancy and Parenthood," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-8, November.
    2. Melissa S. Kearney & Phillip B. Levine, 2012. "Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 141-163, Spring.
    3. Donald P. Green & Adam Zelizer & Winston Lin, 2021. "How Effective Are Radio Messages Aimed at Reducing Teen Births Among Latinas? A Randomized Controlled Trial," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(4), pages 695-722, August.
    4. Stevens, Lindsay M., 2018. "“We have to be mythbusters”: Clinician attitudes about the legitimacy of patient concerns and dissatisfaction with contraception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 145-152.
    5. Yasamin Kusunoki & Jennifer S. Barber, 2020. "The Dynamics of Intimate Relationships and Contraceptive Use During Early Emerging Adulthood," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2003-2034, December.
    6. Bridget Brew & Kelly Musick & Yasamin Kusunoki & Abigail Weitzman, 2020. "Young women's joint relationship, sex, and contraceptive trajectories: Evidence from the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(34), pages 933-984.
    7. Lenhart, Otto, 2021. "The effects of minimum wages on teenage birth rates," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Katie Adamek & Alicia Meckstroth & Hande Inanc & Lindsay Ochoa & So O'Neil & Kim McDonald & Heather Zaveri, "undated". "Conceptual Models to Depict the Factors that Influence the Avoidance and Cessation of Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Youth," Mathematica Policy Research Reports bbc3741c9fbe4963b6e053933, Mathematica Policy Research.
    9. Anand, Priyanka & Kahn, Lisa B., 2024. "The effect of a peer’s teen pregnancy on sexual behavior," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Brian Goesling & Sarah Oberlander & Lisa Trivits, 2017. "High-Stakes Systematic Reviews," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 27-49, February.
    11. Girma, Sourafel & Paton, David, 2015. "Is education the best contraception: The case of teenage pregnancy in England?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Megan Sweeney & Mieke Eeckhaut & Jessica D. Gipson, 2020. "Reconsidering (in)equality in the use of IUDs in the United States: A closer look across the reproductive life course," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(35), pages 1049-1066.
    13. Wolfe, Joseph D. & Thomeer, Mieke Beth & Reczek, Rin, 2023. "Age at first birth and women's midlife health: Cohort and race differences across the 20th century," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    14. Chloe N. East & Sarah Miller & Marianne Page & Laura R. Wherry, 2023. "Multigenerational Impacts of Childhood Access to the Safety Net: Early Life Exposure to Medicaid and the Next Generation's Health," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(1), pages 98-135, January.
    15. Parekh, Jenita & Blum, Robert & Caldas, Valerie & Whitfield, Brooke & Jennings, Jacky M., 2019. "Program implementer perspectives replicating evidence based sexual reproductive health programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 80-87.
    16. Chien Liu, 2021. "A theory of sexual revolution: explaining the collapse of the norm of premarital abstinence," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 20(1), pages 41-58, June.
    17. Carla Shoff & Tse-Chuan Yang, 2012. "Spatially varying predictors of teenage birth rates among counties in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 27(14), pages 377-418.
    18. Kearney, Melissa S. & Levine, Phillip B., 2015. "Investigating recent trends in the U.S. teen birth rate," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 15-29.
    19. Brian Goesling, "undated". "Making Sense of Replication Studies: Guidance for Teen Pregnancy Prevention Researchers," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 02bb275446464c37a4fddbcdf, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. Hande Inanc & Alicia Meckstroth & Betsy Keating & Katie Adamek & Heather Zaveri & So O’Neil & Kim McDonald & Lindsay Ochoa, "undated". "Factors Influencing Youth Sexual Activity: Conceptual Models for Sexual Risk Avoidance and Cessation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 50fc4ce6f652418495bb2ba7f, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:1-:d:61259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.