IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i3p86-d602691.html

Constitutional Values in the Gig-Economy? Why Labor Law Fails at Platform Work, and What Can We Do about It?

Author

Listed:
  • Zsolt Ződi

    (Institute of the Information Society, University of Public Service, 1083 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Bernát Török

    (Institute of the Information Society, University of Public Service, 1083 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Gig-work, or platform work, has been in the crosshairs of regulators since roughly the mid-2010s. The employment of an increasing number of platform workers raises a number of problems, however, there is no longer a consensus as to whether these problems are only the emergence of certain well-established labor law issues in a new guise, or completely new ones. To date, only one possible solution seems to have emerged, that of bringing platform work under the umbrella of labor law. This study argues, on the one hand, that platform work has a characteristic that was previously unknown in the world of labor relations (algorithmic and data-based work organization) and, on the other hand, that it has two other characteristics (tripartite structure and network effect) that create an entirely new quality that requires innovative legal approaches. The study selects some of the recent European Union standards regulating various kinds of online platforms which may also provide useful solutions for the regulation of platform work.

Suggested Citation

  • Zsolt Ződi & Bernát Török, 2021. "Constitutional Values in the Gig-Economy? Why Labor Law Fails at Platform Work, and What Can We Do about It?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:86-:d:602691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/86/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/86/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sundararajan, Arun, 2016. "The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262034573, December.
    2. Jens-Uwe Franck & Martin Peitz, 2021. "Market Definition in the Platform Economy," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_259, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. Jens-Uwe Franck & Martin Peitz, 2021. "Market Definition in the Platform Economy," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_259, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    4. Jens-Uwe Franck & Martin Peitz, 2021. "Market Definition in the Platform Economy," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_259v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silvia Devita Syahril, 2025. "Determining the Assurance of Rights and Interests for Gig Workers in the Malaysian Ride-Hailing Industry: A Strategic Analysis for Sustained Industry Participation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2110-2123, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kawaguchi, Kohei & Kuroda, Toshifumi & Sato, Susumu, 2023. "Relevant markets and market power of mobile apps," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Belleflamme, Paul & Peitz, Martin & Toulemonde, Eric, 2022. "The tension between market shares and profit under platform competition," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Martin Peitz, 2025. "Governance and Regulation of Platforms," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edition 0, chapter 23, pages 565-593, Springer.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:zyc6s_v2 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. CARBALLA SMICHOWSKI Bruno & DUCH BROWN Nestor & GOMEZ LOSADA Alvaro & MARTENS Bertin, 2021. "When ‘the’ market loses its relevance: an empirical analysis of demand-side linkages in platform ecosystems," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2021-07, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Andrey SHEVCHUK & Denis STREBKOV, 2023. "Digital platforms and the changing freelance workforce in the Russian Federation: A ten‐year perspective," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(1), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Tetsuya Shinkai & Naoshi Doi, 2023. "Menu-pricing and Quality Decisions of a Platform Monopolist," Discussion Paper Series 252, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    8. Nalbach, Eva, 2018. "Sharing Economy: Dynamic General Equilibrium Effects," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181643, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Petra Ritzer-Angerer, 2021. "Sharing Economy trifft ÖPNV — das neue Personenbeförderungsgesetz [Sharing Economy Meets Public Transport — The New Passenger Transport Act]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(10), pages 789-794, October.
    10. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Sandström, Christian & Eriksson, Klas & Nykvist, Rasmus, 2019. "Digital entrepreneurship and field conditions for institutional change– Investigating the enabling role of cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 877-886.
    11. Drapalova, Eliska & Wegrich, Kai, 2024. "Platforms' regulatory disruptiveness and local regulatory outcomes in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28.
    12. Alexander Frey & Manuel Trenz & Daniel Veit, 2019. "A service-dominant logic perspective on the roles of technology in service innovation: uncovering four archetypes in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1149-1189, December.
    13. Pia Szichta & Ingela Tietze, 2020. "Sharing Economy in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft: Treiber und Hemmnisse [Title sharing economy in the electricity sector: drivers and barriers]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 109-125, December.
    14. Soraya SEDKAOUI & Rafika Benaichouba, 2019. "How data analytics drive sharing economy business models?," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9911754, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    15. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner, 2020. "Reputation portability – quo vadis?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 331-349, June.
    16. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    17. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner & Marc T. P. Adam, 2022. "In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 349-358, June.
    18. Laudien, Sven M. & Manuel Guaita Martínez, José & María Martín Martín, José, 2023. "Business models based on sharing fashion and accessories: Qualitative-empirical insights into a new type of sharing economy business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Relationships between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Context of Their Perception by Final Purchasers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Vincenzo Vignieri, 2021. "Crowdsourcing as a mode of open innovation: Exploring drivers of success of a multisided platform through system dynamics modelling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 108-124, January.
    21. Rajeev Kumar, 2022. "A Gig Worker-Centric Approach for Efficient Picking and Delivery of Electric Scooters," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:86-:d:602691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.