IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sumafo/v28y2020i3d10.1007_s00550-020-00506-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharing Economy in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft: Treiber und Hemmnisse
[Title sharing economy in the electricity sector: drivers and barriers]

Author

Listed:
  • Pia Szichta

    (Technische Universität München (TUM)
    Hochschule Pforzheim)

  • Ingela Tietze

    (Hochschule Pforzheim)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Im Rahmen der Energiewende in Deutschland erfolgt eine schrittweise Dezentralisierung der Energieerzeugung und damit einhergehend nehmen Sharing-Angebote zu. Verglichen mit anderen Branchen ist das Sharing-Angebot in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft gering. In diesem Beitrag werden deshalb anhand einer Literaturrecherche und darauf basierenden Experteninterviews Treiber und Hemmnisse für Sharing-Angebote in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft identifiziert. Darüber hinaus werden begünstigende Rahmenbedingungen und Umweltwirkungen aus Expertensicht erhoben. In einer multiplen Fallanalyse werden aufbauend die Fallbeispiele Brooklyn Microgrid, Power Peers und die sonnenCommunity analysiert. Die Ergebnisse dieser Fallanalyse zeigen Heterogenitäten im Aufbau und in der praktischen Umsetzung, weshalb Verallgemeinerungen zu Treibern und Hemmnissen nur beschränkt möglich sind. Der in dem Beitrag beschriebene Systematisierungsansatz bietet allerdings die Möglichkeit, verschiedene Fallbeispiele inhaltlich differenziert zu untersuchen und miteinander zu vergleichen. Auf dieser Grundlage werden erste Handlungsempfehlungen für Anbieter und Politik abgeleitet, die eine Umsetzung von Sharing-Ansätzen in der Energiewirtschaft begünstigen.

Suggested Citation

  • Pia Szichta & Ingela Tietze, 2020. "Sharing Economy in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft: Treiber und Hemmnisse [Title sharing economy in the electricity sector: drivers and barriers]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 109-125, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:28:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00550-020-00506-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00550-020-00506-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00550-020-00506-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00550-020-00506-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frederik Plewnia, 2019. "The Energy System and the Sharing Economy: Interfaces and Overlaps and What to Learn from Them," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Zhou, Yue & Wu, Jianzhong & Long, Chao, 2018. "Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 993-1022.
    3. Maike Gossen & Jonas Pentzien & Jan Peuckert, 2019. "What use is it really for sustainability? Potentials and impacts of peer-to-peer sharing in the domains of accommodation and mobility," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 125-138, June.
    4. Francesco Pasimeni, 2019. "Community-Based Adoption and Diffusion of Micro-Grids: Analysis of the Italian Case with Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11.
    5. Gährs, Swantje & Knoefel, Jan, 2020. "Stakeholder demands and regulatory framework for community energy storage with a focus on Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Hess, David J. & Lee, Dasom, 2020. "Energy decentralization in California and New York: Conflicts in the politics of shared solar and community choice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    7. Parra, David & Norman, Stuart A. & Walker, Gavin S. & Gillott, Mark, 2017. "Optimum community energy storage for renewable energy and demand load management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 358-369.
    8. Ingela Tietze, 2020. "Sharing economy in the German energy transition," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(3), pages 392-412.
    9. Poppen, Silvia, 2015. "Energiegenossenschaften und deren Mitglieder: Erste Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung," Arbeitspapiere 157, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    10. Sundararajan, Arun, 2016. "The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262034573, December.
    11. Hackbarth, André & Löbbe, Sabine, 2020. "Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdullah M. Alabdullatif & Enrico H. Gerding & Alvaro Perez-Diaz, 2020. "Market Design and Trading Strategies for Community Energy Markets with Storage and Renewable Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-31, February.
    2. Francesco Pasimeni, 2020. "The Origin of the Sharing Economy Meets the Legacy of Fractional Ownership," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-19, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    3. Dynge, Marthe Fogstad & Berg, Kjersti & Bjarghov, Sigurd & Cali, Ümit, 2023. "Local electricity market pricing mechanisms’ impact on welfare distribution, privacy and transparency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    4. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K. & Yuen, Chau & Smith, David, 2022. "Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Meritxell Domènech Monfort & César De Jesús & Natapon Wanapinit & Niklas Hartmann, 2022. "A Review of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading with Standard Terminology Proposal and a Techno-Economic Characterisation Matrix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Andrey SHEVCHUK & Denis STREBKOV, 2023. "Digital platforms and the changing freelance workforce in the Russian Federation: A ten‐year perspective," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(1), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Michael J. Fell & Alexandra Schneiders & David Shipworth, 2019. "Consumer Demand for Blockchain-Enabled Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in the United Kingdom: An Online Survey Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Petra Ritzer-Angerer, 2021. "Sharing Economy trifft ÖPNV — das neue Personenbeförderungsgesetz [Sharing Economy Meets Public Transport — The New Passenger Transport Act]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(10), pages 789-794, October.
    9. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    10. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    11. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Optimal energy management in all-electric residential energy systems with heat and electricity storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    12. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner & Marc T. P. Adam, 2022. "In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 349-358, June.
    13. Wulf Inge & Kramer Mike & Sackbrook Jürgen Lars, 2017. "Wachstum und Rentabilität badenwürttembergischer, bayerischer und niedersächsischer stromerzeugender Energiegenossenschaften im Zeitraum 2006-2015," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 36-54, March.
    14. Lyu, Cheng & Jia, Youwei & Xu, Zhao, 2021. "Fully decentralized peer-to-peer energy sharing framework for smart buildings with local battery system and aggregated electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    15. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Relationships between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Context of Their Perception by Final Purchasers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Min-Hwi Kim & Dong-Won Lee & Deuk-Won Kim & Young-Sub An & Jae-Ho Yun, 2021. "Energy Performance Investigation of Bi-Directional Convergence Energy Prosumers for an Energy Sharing Community," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Vincenzo Vignieri, 2021. "Crowdsourcing as a mode of open innovation: Exploring drivers of success of a multisided platform through system dynamics modelling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 108-124, January.
    18. Rajeev Kumar, 2022. "A Gig Worker-Centric Approach for Efficient Picking and Delivery of Electric Scooters," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    19. Saif Benjaafar & Daniel Jiang & Xiang Li & Xiaobo Li, 2022. "Dynamic Inventory Repositioning in On-Demand Rental Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7861-7878, November.
    20. Agam Gupta & Biswatosh Saha & Parthasarathi Banerjee, 2018. "Pricing decisions of car aggregation platforms in sharing economy: a developing economy perspective," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(5), pages 341-355, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:28:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00550-020-00506-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.