IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i5p67-d353123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Imagination of Possible and ‘Like-to-Avoid’ Selves among Higher Education Students from Different Socioeconomic Backgrounds at a Selective English University

Author

Listed:
  • Katherin Barg

    (Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, UK)

  • Simon Benham-Clarke

    (Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, UK)

  • Anna Mountford-Zimdars

    (Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, UK)

Abstract

Access to and participation in higher education (HE) remains unequal, with social background continuing to influence decisions and experiences. In this paper, we undertake a proof-of-concept design to apply the theory of ‘possible selves’, as adapted by Harrison and published in Social Sciences (2018), to university students from different socioeconomic backgrounds. In 2019, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 first-year students, from different socioeconomic backgrounds, currently studying at a selective English university. We applied a deductive analysis based on Harrison’s adaptation of the ‘possible selves’ model originally put forward by Markus and Nurius in the 1980s. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds had a clear drive to ‘avoid’ future selves that would emerge without HE. Across all socioeconomic groups, we found a strong sense of agency, and a strong personal belief in success. Overall, our study shows that the model of possible selves is useful for understanding personalised and individualised student experiences, and the interrelation between social structure (socioeconomic condition) and agency. The model also offers a new way for practitioners to plan interventions for enhancing equity in HE access and participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherin Barg & Simon Benham-Clarke & Anna Mountford-Zimdars, 2020. "Investigating the Imagination of Possible and ‘Like-to-Avoid’ Selves among Higher Education Students from Different Socioeconomic Backgrounds at a Selective English University," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:67-:d:353123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/67/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/5/67/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert Simon, 2000. "Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 1(1), pages 25-39, March.
    2. Neil Harrison, 2018. "Using the Lens of ‘Possible Selves’ to Explore Access to Higher Education: A New Conceptual Model for Practice, Policy, and Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Jake Anders & John Micklewright, 2013. "Teenagers' expectations of applying to university: how do they change?," DoQSS Working Papers 13-13, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Stadelmann & Benno Torgler, 2012. "Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions Exploring a 160-Year Period," Working Papers 2012.70, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Baxter Jamie, 2019. "Leadership, Law and Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 119-158, January.
    3. Jieun Lee, 2024. "The Roles of Identity-Based Motivation and Perceived Instrumentality for Probationary Students’ Positive Self-Beliefs, Self-Regulation, and Performance," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(4), pages 655-678, June.
    4. Xiaoping He & David Reiner, 2018. "Consumer Engagement in Energy Markets: The Role of Information and Knowledge," Working Papers EPRG 1835, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    5. Sanjit Dhami & Ali al-Nowaihi, 2018. "Rationality in Economics: Theory and Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 6872, CESifo.
    6. Francesco GRECO, 2017. "Complexity and economy," International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Spiru Haret University, vol. 4(1), pages 181-189, November.
    7. Schuster, Stephan, 2012. "Applications in Agent-Based Computational Economics," MPRA Paper 47201, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Benedetta Giovanola, 2009. "Re-Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capabilities Enhancement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 431-444, September.
    9. Marina Della Giusta & Sarah Jewell & Danica Vukadinovic Greetham, 2017. "Beliefs, Exams and Social Media: A Study of Girls and Boys in the UK," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2017-02, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    10. Kyoung Tae Kim & Jonghee Lee & Sherman D. Hanna, 2020. "The Effects of Financial Literacy Overconfidence on the Mortgage Delinquency of US Households," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 517-540, June.
    11. Óscar Eduardo Pérez Rodríguez, 2015. "Interpretations and Theoretical Uses of the Concept of Rationality in Economics," Revista Equidad y Desarrollo, Universidad de la Salle, May.
    12. Mohammad Alipour & Rodney A. Stewart & Oz Sahin, 2021. "Beyond the Diffusion of Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems at Scale: Allegorising the Battery Energy Storage Adoption Behaviour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:5:p:401-412 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mario GRAZIANO & Daniele SCHILIRÒ, 2011. "Rationality And Choices In Economics: Behavioral And Evolutionary Approaches," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 182-195.
    15. Schilirò, Daniele, 2011. "Decisioni e razionalità in economia [Decisions and rationality in economics]," MPRA Paper 29477, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Eben Upton & William J. Nuttall, 2013. "Fuel Panics: insights from spatial agent-based simulation," Working Papers EPRG 1305, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    17. Kyoung Tae Kim & Somer G. Anderson & Martin C. Seay, 2019. "Financial Knowledge and Short-Term and Long-Term Financial Behaviors of Millennials in the United States," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 194-208, June.
    18. Patalano Roberta, 2003. "Beyond rationality: images as guide-lines to choice," CESMEP Working Papers 200305, University of Turin.
    19. Castellani, Marco & Di Giovinazzo, Viviana & Novarese, Marco, 2010. "Procedural rationality and happiness," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 376-383, June.
    20. Johansson Vicki, 2015. "When will we ever learn ?," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 149-170, December.
    21. Kao-Yi Shen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2018. "Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainability: Modeling and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-7, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:67-:d:353123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.