IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i1p22-d197120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community-Engaged Research Builds a Nature-Culture of Hope on North American Great Plains Rangelands

Author

Listed:
  • Hailey Wilmer

    (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA)

  • Lauren M. Porensky

    (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA)

  • María E. Fernández-Giménez

    (Forest and Rangeland Stewardship Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Justin D. Derner

    (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA)

  • David J. Augustine

    (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA)

  • John P. Ritten

    (Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA)

  • Dannele P. Peck

    (Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA)

Abstract

In the North American Great Plains, multigenerational ranches and grassland biodiversity are threatened by dynamic and uncertain climatic, economic, and land use processes. Working apart, agricultural and conservation communities face doubtful prospects of reaching their individual goals of sustainability. Rangeland research could serve a convening platform, but experimental studies seldom involve local manager communities. The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management (CARM) project, however, has undertaken a ten-year, ranch-level, participatory research effort to explore how community-engaged research can increase our understanding of conservation and ranching goals. Using ethnographic data and the nature-culture concept—which recognizes the inseparability of ecological relationships that are shaped by both biological and social processes—we examine the CARM team’s process of revising their management objectives (2016–2018). In CARM’s early days, the team established locally-relevant multifunctional goals and objectives. As team members’ understanding of the ecosystem improved, they revised objectives using more spatially, temporally and ecologically specific information. During the revision process, they challenged conventional ecological theories and grappled with barriers to success outside of their control. The emerging CARM nature-culture, based on a sense of place and grounded in hope, provides insights into effective community-engaged research to enhance rangeland livelihood and conservation outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailey Wilmer & Lauren M. Porensky & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Justin D. Derner & David J. Augustine & John P. Ritten & Dannele P. Peck, 2019. "Community-Engaged Research Builds a Nature-Culture of Hope on North American Great Plains Rangelands," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:22-:d:197120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/1/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/1/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur H. Smith & William E. Martin, 1972. "Socioeconomic Behavior of Cattle Ranchers, with Implications for Rural Community Development in the West," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 217-225.
    2. Justin Derner & David Briske & Matt Reeves & Tami Brown-Brandl & Miranda Meehan & Dana Blumenthal & William Travis & David Augustine & Hailey Wilmer & Derek Scasta & John Hendrickson & Jerry Volesky &, 2018. "Vulnerability of grazing and confined livestock in the Northern Great Plains to projected mid- and late-twenty-first century climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 19-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanaka, John A. & Torell, L. Allen & Rimbey, Neil R., 2005. "Who Are Public Land Ranchers and Why Are They Out There?," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-7.
    2. Hailey Wilmer & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Shayan Ghajar & Peter Leigh Taylor & Caridad Souza & Justin D. Derner, 2020. "Managing for the middle: rancher care ethics under uncertainty on Western Great Plains rangelands," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 699-718, September.
    3. Ziemer, Rod F. & White, Fred C., 1981. "A Tobit Model Of The Demand For Farmland," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-5, December.
    4. Jose L. Oviedo & Lynn Huntsinger & Pablo Campos & Alejandro Caparrós, 2011. "Assessing the income value of private amenities in California oak woodlands," Working Papers 1110, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    5. Young, Katherine D. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1991. "Cow-Calf Producers' Perceived Profit Maximization Objective: A Logit Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 129-136, July.
    6. Ockwell, Anthony P. & Batterham, Robert L., 1982. "The Influence of Credit on Farm Growth," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(03), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Mhlangabezi Slayi & Leocadia Zhou & Ishmael Festus Jaja, 2023. "Constraints Inhibiting Farmers’ Adoption of Cattle Feedlots as a Climate-Smart Practice in Rural Communities of the Eastern Cape, South Africa: An In-Depth Examination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-30, October.
    8. Srinivasagan N. Subhashree & C. Igathinathane & Adnan Akyuz & Md. Borhan & John Hendrickson & David Archer & Mark Liebig & David Toledo & Kevin Sedivec & Scott Kronberg & Jonathan Halvorson, 2023. "Tools for Predicting Forage Growth in Rangelands and Economic Analyses—A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
    9. Skaggs, Rhonda K. & Kirksey, R.E. & Harper, Wilmer M., 1994. "Determinants And Implication Of Post-Crp Land Use Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, December.
    10. David K. Lambert & Gordon Myer, 1988. "Incremental impacts of the tax reform act of 1986 on western beef cattle ranch values," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(5), pages 425-432.
    11. Skaggs, Rhonda K. & Falk, Constance L., 1998. "Market And Welfare Effects Of Livestock Feed Subsidies In Southeastern New Mexico," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Blackburn, Donald J. & Brinkman, George L. & Driver, Herbert C. & Wilson, Trevor D., 1979. "A Comparison of Behavioral and Economic Characteristics of Selected Commercial and Limited Resource Farmers," Working Papers 244840, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    13. Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "Comparing Estimates of Market and Nonmarket Values for Products of a Given Land Base," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329532, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Adhikari, Saroj & Joshi, Omkar & Sorice, Michael G. & Fuhlendorf, Samuel D., 2023. "Factors affecting the adoption of patch-burn grazing in the southern Great Plains in the US," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    15. Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "A Welfare Economic Analysis Of The Potential Competition Between Hunting And Cattle Ranching," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, December.
    16. José L. Oviedo & Lynn Huntsinger & Pablo Campos, 2015. "Reconciling landowner income and land prices: the case of Spanish and California oak woodlands," Working Papers 1502, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    17. Tanaka, John A. & Rimbey, Neil R. & Torell, L. Allen, 2005. "Rangeland Economics, Ecology, And Sustainability: Implications For Policy And Economic Research," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7.
    18. C. Arden Pope III & H. L. Goodwin, 1984. "Impacts of Consumptive Demand on Rural Land Values," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 750-754.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:22-:d:197120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.