IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Welfare Economic Analysis Of The Potential Competition Between Hunting And Cattle Ranching

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, William E.
  • Tinney, J. Craig
  • Gum, Russell L.

Abstract

Comparable empirical estimates of the market and nonmarket values of range cattle production and hunting activity on the same land are developed in the welfare economic framework of consumers' surplus, producers' surplus, and the corresponding Hicksian consumer welfare measures. The values are compared to illustrate possible trade-offs that would occur under potential conflict among users of the land resource. The welfare distribution issue is examined both in terms of aggregate and individual compensation that could occur between the alternative users.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "A Welfare Economic Analysis Of The Potential Competition Between Hunting And Cattle Ranching," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32554
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32554/files/03020087.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur H. Smith & William E. Martin, 1972. "Socioeconomic Behavior of Cattle Ranchers, with Implications for Rural Community Development in the West," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 217-225.
    2. James P. Houck, 1965. "The Relationship of Direct Price Flexibilities to Direct Price Elasticities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(3), pages 789-792.
    3. Russell L. Gum & William E. Martin, 1977. "Structure of Demand for Outdoor Recreation," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 53(1), pages 43-55.
    4. Schmalensee, Richard, 1976. "Another Look at the Social Valuation of Input Price Changes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 239-243, March.
    5. Currie, John Martin & Murphy, John A & Schmitz, Andrew, 1971. "The Concept of Economic Surplus and its Use in Economic Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 741-799, December.
    6. George, P.S. & King, Gordon A., 1971. "Consumer Demand for Food Commodities in the United States with Projections for 1980," Monographs, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation, number 11936, December.
    7. Russell L. Gum & William E. Martin, 1975. "Problems and Solutions in Estimating the Demand for and Value of Rural Outdoor Recreation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(4), pages 558-566.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Musser, Wesley N. & Ziemer, Rod F., 1979. "Estimating Recreation Values Associated With Land Use Changes," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Brokken, Ray F. & McCarl, Bruce A., 1987. "A Theoretical Evaluation of Fee Systems for Private Grazing on Federal Lands," Agricultural Economic Reports 308028, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Cory, Dennis C. & Martin, William E., 1985. "Valuing Wildlife For Efficient Multiple Use: Elk Versus Cattle," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "Comparing Estimates of Market and Nonmarket Values for Products of a Given Land Base," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329532, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    3. Sun, Theresa Y., 1977. "Forecasting Retail Values and Spreads for the Market Basket of U.S. Farm Foods," Technical Bulletins 157865, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Eales, James S., 1996. "A Symmetric Approach To Canadian Meat Demand Estimation," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Ziemer, Rod F. & Musser, Wesley N., 1979. "Population-Specific Recreation Demand Models And The Consequences Of Pooling Sample Data," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8, July.
    6. Baumes, Harry S., Jr. & Conway, Roger K., 1985. "An Econometric Model Of The U.S. Apple Market," Staff Reports 277669, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Wells, Gary J. & Thompson, C. Stassen & Miller, Stephen E., 1983. "An Examination of the Farm Level Demand for Pecans," Working Papers 116877, Clemson University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    8. Marsh, John M., 1992. "Usda Data Revisions Of Choice Beef Prices And Price Spreads: Implications For Estimating Demand Responses," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Unknown, 1985. "Proceeding of a Seminar Sponsored by Northcentral Regional Project NC-176, Northeastern Regional Project NE-153 Southern Regional Project S-166 "Dairy Modeling in the 1980's: A Symposium on Curre," Economics and Sociology Occasional Papers - ESO Series 243216, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    10. Martin, William E., 1979. "Returns To Public Irrigation Development And The Concomitant Costs Of Commodity Programs," 1979 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, Pullman, Washington 277609, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Li, Chenguang & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "Impacts of Retailers’ Pricing Strategies for Produce Commodities on Farmer Welfare," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51720, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Capps, Oral Jr. & Havlicek, Joseph Jr., 1980. "National And Regional Household Demands For Meats And Seafood In The U.S.: A Complete Systems Approach," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278409, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Miller, Stephen E. & Kahl, Kandice H. & Rathwell, P. James, 2000. "Revenue Insurance For Georgia And South Carolina Peaches," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-10, April.
    14. Richard Pomfret, 1978. "The economic consequences for Israel of free trade in manufactured goods with the EEC," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 114(3), pages 526-539, September.
    15. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Javelosa, Josyline C. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2006. "Costs and Benefits of a WTO Dispute: Philippine Bananas and the Australian Market," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26.
    17. Borrell, Brent, 1991. "How a change in Brazil's sugar policies would affect the world sugar market," Policy Research Working Paper Series 642, The World Bank.
    18. Okunade, Albert A. & Cochran, Mark J., 1991. "Functional Forms and Farm-Level Demand for Pecans by Variety," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 95-102, December.
    19. Dunn, James E. & Heien, Dale, 1985. "The Demand For Farm Output," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, July.
    20. Ospina, Enrique & Shumway, C. Richard, 1979. "Disaggregated Analysis Of Short-Run Beef Supply Response," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.