IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/364817.html

Economic analysis of 50% non-pollinating (FNP) maize varieties, a promising new seed production technology for Africa

Author

Listed:
  • De Groote, Hugo
  • Gharib, Mariam
  • Cairns, Jill E.
  • Olsen, Michael S.

Abstract

Maize is the most important food crop in sub-Saharan Africa, but production cannot keep up with population growth. New technologies are needed, especially for low N environments. 50% non-pollen producing (FNP) maize, based on male-sterile dominant genes, makes maize more N-efficient, increasing yields by 200 kg/ha even on poor soils. Moreover, by selectively applying the technology to new varieties, varietal turnover can be increased, adding yield benefits of younger varieties (20.9 kg/ha/year). We calculate the benefits of the technology with the economic surplus model. Yield benefits are derived from field trials and extrapolated using secondary data and parameters from the literature. Calculations show that FNP will increase maize yields in SSA directly by 192 kg/ha, indirectly by 136 kg/ha. Assuming an adoption rate of 10% of current hybrid maize area, the maize supply will shift by 460k tonnes. In equilibrium, production increaseses by 210k tonnes, while prices drop by US$4.6/tonne, leading to an annual economic surplus of $781 million. The discounted costs of the project are relatively small, $29 million, compared to the discounted benefits of $3,6 billion, with a benefit cost ratio of 125. Sensitivity analysis shows that even with half the yield benefits and half the adoption rate, the benefits will still be four times the costs. We conclude that the benefits of the technology are very high compared to the costs, and the technology is worth pursuing, both for its direct effect on yield and for its effect on increasing varietal turnover.

Suggested Citation

  • De Groote, Hugo & Gharib, Mariam & Cairns, Jill E. & Olsen, Michael S., 2023. "Economic analysis of 50% non-pollinating (FNP) maize varieties, a promising new seed production technology for Africa," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364817, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364817
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364817/files/147.%20Maize%20in%20Africa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Binswanger-Mkhize, Hans P. & Savastano, Sara, 2017. "Agricultural intensification: The status in six African countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 26-40.
    2. Currie, John Martin & Murphy, John A & Schmitz, Andrew, 1971. "The Concept of Economic Surplus and its Use in Economic Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 741-799, December.
    3. Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Mwangi, Wilfred & Diallo, Alpha O. & MacRobert, John & Dixon, John & Bänziger, Marianne, 2010. "Challenges of the maize seed industry in eastern and southern Africa: A compelling case for private-public intervention to promote growth," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 323-331, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hugo De Groote & Nilupa S. Gunaratna & Monica Fisher & E. G. Kebebe & Frank Mmbando & Dennis Friesen, 2016. "The effectiveness of extension strategies for increasing the adoption of biofortified crops: the case of quality protein maize in East Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(6), pages 1101-1121, December.
    2. Fredrick Bagamba & Proscovia R. Ntakyo & Geoffrey Otim & David J. Spielman & Bjorn Van Campenhout, 2023. "Policy and performance in Uganda's seed sector: Opportunities and challenges," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(3), May.
    3. Cheng, Zhiqiang & Cai, Jinyang, 2026. "How does land transfer intervention promote farmers’ land investment? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Richard Pomfret, 1978. "The economic consequences for Israel of free trade in manufactured goods with the EEC," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 114(3), pages 526-539, September.
    5. Kunkel, David E. & Gonzales, Leonardo A. & Hiwatig, Mario H., 1977. "Application Of Mathematical Programming Models Simulating Competitive Market Equilibrium For Agricultural Policy And Planning Analysis," 1977 Occasional Paper Series No. 1 190948, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    7. Javelosa, Josyline C. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2006. "Costs and Benefits of a WTO Dispute: Philippine Bananas and the Australian Market," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(01), pages 1-26.
    8. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O., 2015. "Fertilizer subsidies, political influence and local food prices in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nigeria," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-24.
    9. Hussen, Ahmed M., 1979. "Assessment Of The Economic And Social Impacts Of Agricultural Technology: A Case Study," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, December.
    10. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:7430-7437 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Pokorny, Benno & von Lübke, Christian & Dayamba, Sidzabda Djibril & Dickow, Helga, 2019. "All the gold for nothing? Impacts of mining on rural livelihoods in Northern Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 23-39.
    12. Kathage, Jonas & Qaim, Matin & Kassie, Menale & Shiferaw, Bekele A., 2012. "Seed market liberalization, hybrid maize adoption, and impacts on smallholder farmers in Tanzania," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126231, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Economic Evaluation Team, USDA Interagency Working Group on Boll Weevil Programs, 1981. "Economic Evaluation of Beltwide Boll Weevil/Cotton Insect Management Programs (Appendix B)," Staff Reports 333513, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Hess, S. & Kleinschmit, D. & Theuvsen, L. & von Cramon-Taubadel, S. & Zschache, U., . "A Discourse Analysis Approach to Explain the Path Dependency of Seasonal Farm Labour Regulations in Germany," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44.
    15. Byman H. Hamududu & Hambulo Ngoma, 2020. "Impacts of climate change on water resources availability in Zambia: implications for irrigation development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 2817-2838, April.
    16. Fischer, Martin L. & Hammond, Jerome W. & Dahl, Dale C., 1981. "Impacts Of Farm Supply Cooperatives On Oligopolistic Farm Input Markets: A Theoretical Analysis," Staff Papers 13746, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. Scobie, Grant M., 1976. "Who Benefits From Agricultural Research?," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(04), pages 1-6, December.
    18. Jarrett, Frank G. & Lindner, Robert K., 1977. "Research Benefits Revisited," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Sinden, Jack A., 1978. "Estimation Of Consumer'S Surplus Values For Land Policies," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 22(2-3), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Kumar, Ranjit & Alam, Khurshid & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Srinivas, K., 2012. "Value Chain Analysis of Maize Seed Delivery System in Public and Private Sectors in Bihar," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 25(Conferenc).
    21. John O.S. Kennedy, 1980. "On The Derivation Of Indifference Curves For Estimating Consumer Surplus," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 291-295, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.